Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Compact Lens Technologies LLC v. Apple, Inc.”
MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff MobileMedia Ideas, LLC (“MobileMedia”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Apple Inc. (“Apple”) on March 31, 2010,. alleging infringement of fourteen of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,070,068 (“the '068 patent”), 6,253,075 (“the '075 patent”), RE39231 (“the '231 patent”), 5,737,394 (“the '394 paten
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.public domain
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille
Ca, Inc. v. Simple. Com, Inc.public domain
780 F.Supp.2d 196 (2009) CA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SIMPLE.COM, INC., Wired Solutions, LLC., a revoked Nevada LLC, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 2748 (DRH)(MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 5, 2009. *201 Covington & Burling, by: Samuel F. Ernst, Esq., Robert D. Fram, Esq., Michael M. Markman, Esq., & Leonard
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
ASETEK Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF Re: ECF Nos. 234, 235, 236 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge This patent infringement case was tried to a jury in December 2014. ECF No. 189. On December 17, 2014, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Ase-tek Danmark A/S, finding that Defendant CMI USA, Inc.’s products infringed
Richard J. Tornetta v. Elon Muskpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. TORNETTA, Individually ) and on Behalf of All Others Similarly ) Situated and Derivatively on Behalf of ) Nominal Defendant TESLA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0408-KSJM ) ELON MUSK, ROBYN M.
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bontapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic
Golden v. United Statespublic domain
FILED MAR 2 9 2018 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 3Jn tbe Wntteb ~tates q[:ourt of jfeberal q[:Iatms No . 13-307C
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bontapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic
League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Bensonpublic domain
CLAY, Circuit Judge The League of Women Voters of Michigan ("League"), numerous League members ("League Plaintiffs"), and several Democratic voters ("Individual Plaintiffs") bring suit against Jocelyn Benson, the Michigan Secretary of State in her official capacity, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, alleging
Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davispublic domain
128 S.Ct. 1801 (2008) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. DAVIS et ux. No. 06-666. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 5, 2007. Decided May 19, 2008. *1804 C. Christopher Trower, Atlanta, GA, for petitioners. G. Eric Brunstad, Jr., Hartford, CT, for respondents.
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Householderpublic domain
HONORABLE KAREN NELSON MOORE, United States Circuit Judge, HONORABLE TIMOTHY S. BLACK, United States District Judge, HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WATSON, United States District Judge *992TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...994 A. General Overview of the Facts...994 B. Procedural History...1009 II
State v. Farhad Nayebpublic domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-00279-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/14/2015 4:13:15 PM
In re Digital Music Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
*71Opinion and Order LORETTA A. PRESEA, Senior United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion for class certification pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3), (Mot. Class Cert., Mar. 19, 2014, ECF No. 227), and an accompanying memorandum of law. (Pl. Mem. Class Cert., Mar. 19, 2014, ECF No. 228). Several individ
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM