Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On March 25, 2013, plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC (collectively “IV”) filed suit in this district against defendants Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., and Canon Solutions America, Inc. (collectively “Canon”), alleging infringement of nine patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,444,728 (“the ’728 pat

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT RODNEY. GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Iris Connex filed suit against eighteen manufacturers of smartphones and tablets, claiming each infringed the Plaintiffs only asset, U.S. Patent No. 6,177,950, which is entitled “Multifunction*832al portable telephone.”

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On May 22, 2014, ScripsAmerica, Inc. (“Scrips”) filed this action against Iron-ridge Global LLC d/b/a Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., John Kirkland, and Brendan O’Neil (collectively “Ironridge”), as well as certain fictitious defendants.1

Case: 23-2427 Document: 85 Page: 1 Filed: 08/11/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARMAID COMPANY INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-2427 ______________________ Appeal from the Uni

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge: On April 5, 2018, a nine-person jury found Defendants liable on Plaintiffs' trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and breach of contract claims and awarded Plaintiffs $34.2 million in statutory damages. In the wake of that verdict, the parties filed a plethora of motions. Defendants move for: (1) renewed judgment as a matter of law, (2) a new trial, (3) remittitu

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE W.D.C. HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a NORTHSTAR ) COMMERCIAL PARTNERS; NSIPI ) ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER, LLC; ) NORTHSTAR COMMERCIAL PARTNERS ) MANAGEMENT, LLC; and NORTHSTAR ) HEALTHCARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC ) ) Plaintiffs, )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-945C Filed: December 18, 2019 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: January 14, 20201 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * VETERAN SHREDDING, LLC, * * Plaintiff, Pre-Award Bid Protest; Cross-

Case: 20-1785 Document: 80 Page: 1 Filed: 04/29/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC., Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee 10X GENOMICS INC., Intervenor ______________________ 2020-1785

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC. AND NEXT SOFTWARE, INC. (formerly known as NeXT Computer, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOTOROLA, INC. (now known as Motorola Solu- tions, Inc.) AND MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendants-Cross Appellants. ______________________ 2012-1548, -1549 ________________

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-501C (Filed: September 25, 2018) ********************************** ) 3RD EYE SURVEILLANCE, LLC and ) Claims of patent infringement; 28 U.S.C. DISCOVERY PATENTS, LLC, ) § 1498(a); patentability; 35 U.S.C. § 101; ) second step of the Alic

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EKO BRANDS, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. ADRIAN RIVERA MAYNEZ ENTERPRISES, INC., ADRIAN RIVERA, Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2018-2215, 2018-2254 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western D

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. The world has come a long way; this is a patent case about robots. InToueh Tech *1332 nologies, Inc. d/b/a InTouch Health (“In-Touch”) and VGo Communications, Inc. (“VGo”) both manufacture remote telepresence robot systems. In 2012, InTouch filed a First Amended Complaint

Filed 4/23/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT AJAXO, INC., H042999 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. CV793

FILED 15-0674 11/16/2015 2:17:39 PM tex-7866695 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Opinion for the court in part filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE, in which Chief Judge RADER and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST join in full, and in which Circuit Judge LINN joins in part II. Opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, dissenting in part, in which Circuit Judges GAJARSA, REYNA, and WALLACH join in full, and in which Circuit Judge LINN joins in parts I — II. LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

MEMORANDUM RULING TUCKER L. MELANCON, Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Google Inc. (“Google”) [Rec. Doc. 37], a memorandum in opposition filed by Firefly Digital, Inc. (“Firefly”) [Rec. Doc. 58] and Google’s reply thereto [Rec. Doc. 71]. For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted. I. Background Firefly filed this

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendant Pepsico, Inc.’s (“Pepsi’s”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint. Docket No. 82 (“Motion”). The operative complaint is the Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”). Docket No. 68. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court GRANTS

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. __________________________ 2009-1372, -1380, -1

ORDER J.P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Court This is a patent case about lithium-ion batteries used in power tools.' Before the Court are the parties’ claim construction briefs and their cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court adopts Plaintiffs’ proposed claim construction in all respects. The Court further finds that Snáp-On ha

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:36 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE