⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Consist Software Solutions Inc. v. Software AG, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 317 F. App'x 76
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Consist Software Solutions, Inc. (“Consist”) appeals the entry of a permanent injunction in favor of defendants Software AG, Inc. and Software AG (collectively “SAG”) following a bench trial on Consist’s contract claims under a distribution agreement between the parties. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.<
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 317 F. App'x 76
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Consist Software Solutions, Inc. (“Consist”) appeals the entry of a permanent injunction in favor of defendants Software AG, Inc. and Software AG (collectively “SAG”) following a bench trial on Consist’s contract claims under a distribution agreement between the parties. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.<
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 323 F. App'x 11
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Consist Software Solutions, Inc., and its CEO, Natalio Fridman (collectively “Consist”), appeal the entry of a preliminary anti-suit injunction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), which, in relevant part, prevents Consist from commencing or prosecuting actions in certain South American countries that (1) seek to compel Software AG, Inc., and Software AG (collectively “SAG”) to act under any purported obligation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 323 F. App'x 11
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Consist Software Solutions, Inc., and its CEO, Natalio Fridman (collectively “Consist”), appeal the entry of a preliminary anti-suit injunction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), which, in relevant part, prevents Consist from commencing or prosecuting actions in certain South American countries that (1) seek to compel Software AG, Inc., and Software AG (collectively “SAG”) to act under any purported obligation
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-09-07 · Published · cited 63× · 836 F.3d 477; 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1053; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16429; 2016 WL 4698270
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: Software maker GlobeRanger obtained a $15 million judgment in a trade secret misappropriation trial against competitor Software AG. Software AG challenges that result on a number of grounds, but its principal argument is that GlobeRanger finds itself in a jurisdictional Catch-22. It argues that GlobeRanger’s trade secret claim is preempted by federal
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-07-03 · Published · cited 12× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 1112
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Docket No. 39 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Software Research, Inc. ("SRI") initiated this patent infringement suit against Defendant Dynatrace LLC ("Dynatrace"), alleging that Dynatrace has directly, indirectly, and willfully in
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-01006-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/11/2015 12:51:33 PM
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014-06-20 · Published · cited 5× · 27 F. Supp. 3d 723; 2014 WL 2807324; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83935
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Software AG USA, Inc. and Software AG, Inc. (together, “SAG”), joined by Nan-*728iq Systems LLC (“Naniq”) (collectively, “Defendants”),1 move for summary judgment on Plaintiff GlobeRanger Corporation’s (“GlobeRanger”) four state law claims, which inc
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-01006-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 790 F.3d 1307; 115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1290; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10245; 2015 WL 3853008
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EPLUS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. LAWSON SOFTWARE, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2013-1506, 2013-1587 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in N
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-05-12 · Published · cited 36× · 260 F. Supp. 3d 401
OPINION & ORDER Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge Enigma Software Group USA, LLC (“Enigma”), a developer of computer security products, brings this action against Malwarebytes, Inc. (“Malwarebytes”), which Enigma claims is its direct competitor in the anti-malware and internet security market. Enigma markets SpyHunter, its leading ánti-malware program; Mal-warebytes markets Malwarebytes
North Carolina Business Court · 2018-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NCBC 87
SiteLink Software, LLC v. Red Nova Labs, Inc., 2018 NCBC 87. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 14 CVS 9922 SITELINK SOFTWARE, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER & OPINION ON v. MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013-05-01 · Published · cited 79× · 717 F.3d 1255; 106 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1649; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8838; 2013 WL 1810957
RADER, Chief Judge. After a jury verdict of infringement with an award of damages in favor of Versata Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., and Versata Computer Industry Solutions, Inc. (collectively “Versata”), SAP America, Inc. and SAP AG (collectively “SAP”) appeal. Ultimately, the trial court found no infringement of the U.S. Patent No. 5,878,400. The jury found i
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 13× · 952 F.3d 1
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1658 ITYX SOLUTIONS AG, Plaintiff, Counter Defendant, Appellee, ITYX SYSTEMWICKLUNG OHG; ITYX TECHNOLOGY GMBH; SULEYMAN ARAYAN; HEIKO GROFTSCHIK, Counter Defendants, v. KODAK ALARIS, INC., Defendant, Counter Plaintiff, Appellant.
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012-10-09 · Published · cited 13× · 902 F. Supp. 2d 841; 2012 WL 4793239; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145020
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. BRYSON, District Judge. Before the Court are five post-trial motions filed by the plaintiffs and one filed by the defendants: (1) Versata’s Motion to Alter or Amend Final Judgment Under Rule 59(e) (Dkt. No. 349); (2) Versata’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity and Infringement (Dkt. No. 350); (3) Versata’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter o
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011-10-11 · Published · cited 77× · 659 F.3d 1121; 100 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1641; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20608; 2011 WL 4793149
659 F.3d 1121 (2011) ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE, INC. and Absolute Software Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STEALTH SIGNAL, INC. and Computer Security Products, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants. Nos. 2010-1503, 2010-1504. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 11, 2011. *1124 Irene Y. Lee, Russ August & Kabat
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-03-10 · Published · cited 27× · 714 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51823; 2010 WL 2134285
714 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. NGP SOFTWARE, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 05-1700 (TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 10, 2010. *3 J. Blair Richardson, Aristotle International, Falls Church, VA, Robert L. Bredhoff, Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, Washington, DC, for P
District Court, D. Delaware · 2011-05-31 · Published · cited 8× · 800 F. Supp. 2d 613; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57853; 2011 WL 2148636
800 F.Supp.2d 613 (2011) ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES, GMBH and Accenture, LLP, Plaintiffs, v. GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 07-826-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 31, 2011. *614 Richard L. Horwitz, Esq. and David E. Moore, Esq. of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, Of Counsel, Jam