Cases

*74 MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND... 76 A. Statutory Framework: The Endangered Species Act Of 1973... 76 1. The 1973 Act.. .77

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BLUE BEACH BUNGALOWS DE, LLC, § § No. 14, 2025 Appellant Below, § Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S24A-04-001 STATE OF DELAWARE,

129 F.Supp.2d 436 (2001) Victor J. CIPOLLA and Susan E. Martin, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF RENSSELAER, County of Rensselaer Executive's Office, Henry Zwack, individually and as County Executive for the County of Rensselaer, Joseph Cybulski, individually and as Deputy County Executive for the County of Rensselaer, Daniel Ehring, individually and as Deputy County Attorney for the County of Rensselaer, Jack Madden, individually and in his capacity

Callahan, J. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs complaint for money damages against the state of Connecticut and the commissioner of correction because the suit was barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity.1 The plaintiff contends that in this cause of action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983,2 th

957 F.Supp. 393 (1997) STATE of NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. LUTHERAN CENTER FOR THE AGING, INC., Defendant. LUTHERAN CENTER FOR THE AGING, INC., Third Party Plaintiff, v. Donna E. SHALALA, as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Third Party Defendant. No. CV 96-4056 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 21, 1997.

736 F.Supp. 1367 (1990) Prakash Gobindram MANWANI and Katherina Constantino Manwani, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant. No. C-C-88-41-M. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. April 23, 1990. *1368 *1369

DECISION AND ORDER Sharon L. Gleason, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Michael Scott Gurnett filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“disability insurance”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the *1188Act”) respectively,1 alleging disability begi

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Virgiliu Necula, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to Martin J. Conroy, Deputy Commissioner of the New York Medicaid Agency of the New York Department of Social Services (“the Department”), and James White, Director of the Department’s Bureau of Program Integrity. After determining that Necula had participated in an improper scheme- of fee splitting with two non-professional management companies, the

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: A section of the New York Public Health Law known as the “Wage Parity Law” sets the minimum amount of total compensation that employers must pay home care aides in order to receive Medicaid reimbursements for reimbursable care provided in New York City and Westchester, Suffolk, and Nassau Counties (the “surrounding Counties”). N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 3614-c. The questions presented

OPINION OF THE COURT Beverly S. Cohen, J. In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, the petitioner, a medical doctor, challenges on constitutional grounds a determination of the New York State Department of Social Services (the Department) dated November 26, 1996 (the Determination). The Determination imposed a fine of $102,000 and suspended the doctor from participating in the New York State Medicaid Provider Pro

13-3790-cv Concerned Home Care Providers, Inc. v. Cuomo 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2014 5 6 (Argued: August 20, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2015) 7 8 No. 13-3790-cv 9 _____________________________________ 10 11 CONCERNED HOME CARE PROVIDERS, I

OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT Dolores Frederick, Patricia Hagaman, and Beverly Taylor (collectively, Objectors) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County (trial court) that affirmed the decision of the Allegheny Township Zoning Hearing Board (Zoning Board) to deny Objectors' land use appeal. In that appeal, Objectors raised a substantive validity challen

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT KATHLEEN VITA[1] vs. NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL (and a consolidated case[2]) Docket: SJC-13542 Dates: April 3, 2024 - October 24, 2024

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 247 OPINION. {¶ 1} The plaintiffs-appellants, Sara Thorp, Carolyn Tyson, Gretchen Scronce, and Sara Runyun ("the Thorp appellants"), appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Louis St

Schaller, J. The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the compensation review board (review board) of the workers’ compensation commission affirming the commissioner’s denial of benefits. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the commissioner properly determined that the decedent, Richard Chute II, was not an employee for purposes of Connecticut’s Workers’ Compensation Act. General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. We affirm the decisi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, on behalf of her minor child K.N., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00070 (TNM) BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is about who must ensure that a disabled ch

531 So.2d 999 (1988) DENTAL ARTS LAB, INC., and Northwestern National Ins., Appellants, v. Gloria CONSTANTINO, Appellee. No. 87-821. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 20, 1988. Lori M. Berliner, of Walsh, Theissen & Boyd, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellants. Frank B. Kessler, Lake Worth, J.J. Goodmark, West Palm Beach, for appellee

WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge I. Background1 In this antitrust action, Plaintiffs Steward Health Care System, LLC, Blackstone Medical Center, Inc., f/k/a Steward Medical Holding Subsidiary Four, Inc., and Blackstone Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc. (collectively, "Steward") claim Defendant Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island ("Blue Cross") unlawfully blocked Steward from entering t

Kelly, C.J. I concur in full with Justice HATHAWAY and with parts I, II, and 111(A) of Justice Young’s opinion. I write separately to touch on parental indemnity agreements in the context of liability waivers involving children. Justice YOUNG takes the position that a defendant can circumvent the unenforceability of a parental preinjury liability waiver simply by entering into a