⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Contreras v. CL Trading LLC”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-491V ************************* * * ARTHUR CONTRERAS, * TO BE PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * * Special Master Katherine E. Oler v.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-10-16 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GATHER WORKSPACES LLC, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-2669 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 15 : THE GATHERING SPOT, LLC, : THE GATHERING SPOT D
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2025-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-24-00051-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG SWAN POINT LANDING COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. AND SWAN POINT LANDING, LLC, Appellants, v. CHRISTOPHER T. MARTIN, CHRIS AND DEB MARTIN RENTAL, LLC, 336 BAYSIDE DRIVE, LLC, 387 BAYSIDE DRIVE, LLC, AND 553 BAYSIDE DRIVE, LLC, Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE 2
California Court of Appeal · 2021-10-18 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/18/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CARLLIE WILLIAMS, C091253 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2019-
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2023-10-19 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-22-00610-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG AVG FITNESS TXOK, LLC, Appellant, v. CRESTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND RBR REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellees. On appeal from the 440th District Court
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMILIANO DE JESUS PORTILLO, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 20-49 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 32 : SMITH COMMONS DC, LLC, et al., : : D
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADRIANN BORUM, et al., : REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC FILING : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 16-1723 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 151, 153, 154,
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00082-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/4/2025 4:15 PM No. 15-25-00082-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SGCI HOLDINGS III LLC, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 24-1204 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 44, 46, 47, 49,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DC2NY, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-2127 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 6 :
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 3× · 218 F. Supp. 3d 1; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160833; 2016 WL 6839364
MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying Dependants’ Motion to Dismiss; Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion foe a Preliminary Injunction RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION At first glance, this case places the Court in the unenviable position of either standing in the way of residential redevelopment or jeop
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 18-1976 Document: 187 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM (CORK) LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1976, 2018-2023 ________
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-3229 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 16
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-03-24 · Published · cited 44× · 85 F. Supp. 3d 13; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36850; 2015 WL 1324416
Re Document Nos.: 14, 18, 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendants’ Motion to Strike or Dismiss the Amended • Complaint, Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to File Supplemental Complaint, and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-09-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAUREATUS GROUP, LLC, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-2103 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 23, 24 : U
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BIOCONVERGENCE LLC d/b/a SINGOTA SOLUTIONS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2090 (CRC) SIMRANJIT JOHNY SINGH, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Bioconvergence LLC d/b/a Singota Solutions (“Singota”) is a life sciences compa
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OWEN PARTRIDGE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 17-0248 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 7, 10, 15, 27
District Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2014-02-06 · Published · cited 2× · 996 F. Supp. 2d 1044; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15797; 2014 WL 539849
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RAMONA V. MANGLONA, Chief Judge. The question of how old law applies to the Internet has often challenged courts. See Edward Lee, Rules and Standards for Cyberspace, 77 Notre Dame L.Rev. 1275, 1278, 1283-84 (2002). Undertaking the challenge, this Court addresses how use of the Internet affects coverage under the Fair Labo
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2013-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-11-00145-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE EMEX HOLDINGS L.L.C. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION Before the Court En Banc1 Memorandum Opinion on Reconsideration by Justice Garza Rela
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 318 F. Supp. 3d 61
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND I. INTRODUCTION This suit arises from a fraught lending relationship between Plaintiff & Counter-Defendant Presidential Bank, FSB ("Presidential") and Defendants & Counter-Claimants Kevin Green and six LL