Cases

SUMMARY ORDER AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby REVERSED and the case REMANDED to the District Court with instructions that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner to develop the record. Appellant Clair Cook (“Cook”) appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New

106 F.3d 325 65 USLW 2543, 97 CJ C.A.R. 196 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Timothy James McVEIGH; Terry Lynn Nichols, Defendants-Appellees.National Victims Center; Mothers Against Drunk Driving;The National Victims' Constitutional Amendment Network;Justice For Surviving Victims, Inc.; Concerns Of PoliceSurvivors, Inc.; Citizens For Law and Order, Inc.;Criminal Justice Leg

DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge Plaintiff appeals from a denial of disability benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security ("the Commissioner"). The action is one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the Commissioner's final determination. On March 21, 2013, plaintiff,

2024 IL App (1st) 240762 SECOND DIVISION September 6, 2024 No. 1-24-0762B _____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Solomon Blisko ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), alleging the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the "Commissioner" or "Defendant") improperly denied Plaintiff's applications for

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated proceedings, we address an important question of criminal procedure involving significant interests of the defendants, prosecution, crime victims, and public, which has thus far received virtually no judicial attention: whether a pretrial order prohibiting victim-impact witnesses from attending the criminal prosecution in which they are slated t

20-1158 Reynolds, et al. v. Quiros, et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2020 (Argued: April 12, 2021 Decided: February 3, 2022) No. 20-1158 _____________________________________ RICHAR

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Represented by counsel, Plaintiff Denise Cecile Kelsey ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to Title II of the Social *440Security Act (the "Act"), seeking review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (th

71 F.Supp.2d 720 (1999) Edward H. McNAMARA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 99-CV-73056. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 18, 1999. Cyril V. Weiner, Thurswell, Chayet, Southfield, MI, for Edward H. McNamara, John D. O'Hair, Ricardo Solomon, Edna Bell, Robert Blackwell, Kathleen Husk, County

JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. *204 ¶1 Allen Longsoldier, Jr.—an eighteen-year-old Native American—died tragically from delirium tremens, a result of alcohol withdrawal, while in custody at the Hill County Detention C

18-3176-pr Vega v. Semple In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2019 No. 18-3176-pr HARRY VEGA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Michael Cruz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Kenya Brown, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jeffrey Perr

07/28/2026 DA 25-0296 Case Number: DA 25-0296 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2026 MT 165 STATE OF MONTANA, Petitioner and Appellee, v. THOMAS WILSON as the Personal Representat

Caffrey v North Arrow Abstract & Settlement Servs., Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 01043) Caffrey v North Arrow Abstract & Settlement Servs., Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 01043 Decided on February 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff April D. Piatt (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *483§ 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), seeking review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying Plaintif

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Victor Lau, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act (t

******************************************************* The "officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the "officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corre

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

596 F.Supp.2d 446 (2009) Jacqueline CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-1551 (JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 23, 2009. *447 Allan B. Rubenstein, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff. Ann M. Nevins, U.S. Attorney's

DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. I. Introduction Represented by counsel, Patricia M. Cozan-Pierce (“Plaintiff’), brings this action pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). This Court ha

Opinion KELLER, J. The petitioner, Travis Wright, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion when it denied the petition for certification to appeal and that it improperly rejected his claims that (1) his tria