Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, et al.; Plaintiffs, v. Civ. Action No. 20-2564 (EGS) DAIMLER AG, et al., Defendants. Memorandum Opinion Pending before the Court are the United States’ Motion to Enter Consent Decree, ECF No. 7, 1 and the State of California’s Motion to Enter Californi

Filed 7/7/14; pub. order 8/5/14 (see end of opn.) (Reposted to correct publication date; no change to opn. text.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR KIMBERLY PATRICE YOUNG et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A135999 v. DAIMLER AG,

Filed 7/7/14; pub. order 8/5/09 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR KIMBERLY PATRICE YOUNG et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A135999 v. DAIMLER AG, (County of Alameda

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: The question presented is whether to issue a writ of mandamus to resolve in favor of the defendants this long-lived litigation under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) — a statute, passed in 1789, that was rediscovered and revitalized by the courts in recent decades to permit aliens to sue for alleged serious violations of human rights occurring abro

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................240 II. BACKGROUND..........................................................241 A. Core Allegations......................................................241 B. Procedural

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Two actions brought on behalf of massive classes of South Africans (“plaintiffs”) assert that several multinational corporations (“defendants”) aided and abetted torts in violation of customary international law. Plaintiffs claim jurisdiction in United States courts under the Alien Tort Claims Act (“ATC

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS ABROAD JAMES LAWRENCE KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Cause having come before the Court on Plaintiffs Lourdes Leon, Alexander Paz, Seth Burack, and Nuria Reina’s Motion for Entry of an Order Directing Service of Process Abroad [DE #23] (“Motion”), requesting entry of an Order (1) directing the Clerk of the Southern District of Florida to r

410 F.Supp.2d 366 (2006) Markus BLECHNER, Capital Invest, Die Kapitalanlagegesellschaft Der Bank Austria Creditanstalt Gruppe GmbH, and Erste-Sparinvest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft, m.b.H., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DAIMLER-BENZ AG, Daimler Chrysler AG, Jurgen E. Schrempp, Eckhard Cordes, Manfred Gentz, Jurgen Hubbert, Manfred Bischoff, Kurt Lauk, Klaus Mangold, Heiner Tropitzch, Klaus-Dieter Vohrin

454 B.R. 38 (2011) In re OLD CARCO LLC (f/k/a Chrysler LLC), et al., Debtors. The Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Daimler AG, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-50002 (AJG). Adversary No. 09-00505 (AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 12, 2011. *41 Shearman & Sterling LLP, By: Alan S. Goudiss, Esq.

435 B.R. 169 (2010) In re OLD CARCO LLC (f/k/a Chrysler LLC), et al., Debtors. The Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Daimler AG, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-50002 (AJG). Adversary No. 09-00505 (AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. July 27, 2010. *174 Shearman & Sterling LLP, by Alan S. Goudiss, Es

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-18-2007 In Re: Daimler Precedential or Non-Precedentia

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0069p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BRIAN LYNGAAS, D.D.S., individually and as the │ repre

[Cite as State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 2014-Ohio-2072.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, ex rel. : Daimler Chrysler Corp., : Relator, : v. No. 13AP-306

KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on four pending motions to dismiss: (1) Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC's ("MBUSA['s]" and, collectively with Defendant Daimler AG,1 "Mercedes Benz['s]") FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss (DE 78; Response DE 97; Reply DE 104); (2) Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc.'s ("Honda['s]" and, co

*530OPINION HOFFMAN, Senior Judge. Defendant-Appellant Daimler Chrysler Corporation ("Daimler") appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss and compel Plaintiffs-Appellees Samuel Yae-ger and Diane Yaeger ("the Yaegers") to submit to arbitration. We reverse and remand with instructions. We consider the following issues

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge Defendant’s motion for an order dismissing the above-entitled action for lack of personal jurisdiction came on for hearing before this court on January 21, 2015. Plaintiff appeared by its counsel Thomas Easton, and defendant appeared by its counsel Lauren Eber. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: September 21, 2021 S20G1368. COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. MCCALL. LAGRUA, Justice. We granted certiorari in this products liability action against an out-of-state corporation to reconsider one of our holdings in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Klein, 262 Ga. 599 (422 SE2d 863) (1992). In Klein, we held that Georgia courts may exercise general personal jurisdiction over any out-of-state corporation that i

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge. Table of Contents I. Background... 537 A. Summary of CHF LIBOR... 537 B. Relationship between CHF LIBOR and Swiss Franc Derivatives.. .537 C. The Parties and the Types of Swiss Franc Deriv

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0439p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiffs-Appellees, - AUDI

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the 1998 merger of Daimler-Benz AG, a German corporation and owner of the Mercedes-Benz brand, and Chrysler Corporation, one of the “Big Three” American automakers. Prior to closing, the merger had been billed as a “merger of equals,” with management of the new company, Daimler-Chrysler AG, to be shared equally between former Daimler-Benz and Chrysler e