Cases

PER CURIAM: Douglas J. Corbett appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corbett v. Astrue, No. 1:04-cv-00241-IMK (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense wit

OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION v. CORBETT OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION v. CORBETT2021 OK 30Case Number: 119357Decided: 06/01/2021THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2021 OK 30, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT I

LAWRENCE F. RODOWSKY (Retired, specially assigned), J. This case calls upon us to delve once again into the issue of genetic testing to determine paternity. In particular we are asked to determine whether a man who claims to be the father of a child conceived while the mother was married to another man, but born after the mother and her husband divorced, has an unconditional right to genetic testing to determine whether he is

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge: Plaintiff David Corbett, Jr. (“plaintiff’) brings this action alleging employment discrimination based on race and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. 'Specifically, plaintiff claims that he was discriminated and retaliated against when his employment with the U.S

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [# 16] and REMANDING ACTION DENISE PAGE HOOD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris’s Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 16, filed July 30, 2014] In this Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Morris recommended that this Court GRANT Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10, filed January

16 A.3d 233 (2011) 198 Md. App. 38 William CORBETT v. Amy MULLIGAN. No. 1033, September Term, 2010. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 30, 2011. *234 Keith N. Schiszik (Day & Schiszik, on the brief), Frederick, MD, for appellant. Laura N. Venezia (Conklyn & Associates, on the brief)

780 F.Supp.2d 486 (2011) Peter CORBETT, Plaintiff, v. Ronald DUERRING and the Kanawha County Board of Education, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:10-1053. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. January 28, 2011. *488 David R. Pogue, Michael W. Carey, Carey Scott Douglas & Kessler, Charleston, WV, for P

Case: 19-11405 Date Filed: 08/21/2020 Page: 1 of 37 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11405 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 1:18-cv-00677-AKK;

946 A.2d 668 (2008) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, ex rel., PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL Tom CORBETT and Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne Abraham, Petitioners v. Deborah Shelton GRIFFIN, Respondent. No. 130 EM 2007. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 5, 2008. Decided May 6, 2008. *671 Barry Noah Kram

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON. In these consolidated appeals, four former mortgage consultants allegedly involved in a huge fraudulent mortgage scheme seek reversal of a preliminary injunction entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County (trial court) in a consumer protection action brought by the Commonwealth, acting by Attorney General Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., (Commonwealth) pursuant to the Unfair Trade Pra

Levin, J. The question presented concerns statutory coordination of weekly worker’s compensation benefits with a lump sum paid to the employee pursuant to his election for early withdrawal, in full liquidation of his interest, from a pension or retirement program established or maintained by his employer. The statute1 provides that the employer’s obligation to remit weekly worker’

484 F.Supp.2d 359 (2007) INMATES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas W. CORBETT, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-2687. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 25, 2007. *360 Andrea L. D'Ambra, Viktoriya Meyerov, Wilson M. Brown, III, Maresa H. Torregrossa, Drinker, Bidd

923 A.2d 1230 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Acting by Attorney General Thomas W. CORBETT, Jr., Plaintiff v. PEOPLES BENEFIT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 10, 2007. Decided May 14, 2007. *1232 David Sumner, Sr. Deputy Attorney General and Linda J. Williams, Chief Deputy Attorney

ANDERSON, Chief Judge: The appellant Richard M. Rinaldo, a/k/a, Muhammed Abdul Muhammed, joined with three other inmates, to file the instant pro se suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Broward County and individual employees of the County Jail 1 (collectively “Defendants”), alleging that the Defend

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 99-10801 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

LEADBETTER, Judge. On December 16, 1996, petitioners filed a petition for review in the nature of a complaint in equity on behalf of themselves as well as other similar adult-oriented establishments.1 According to the averments of their petition, petitioners are engaged in the retail sale of general interest magazines, novelty items and non-obscene, sexually-oriented magazines and videotapes. In addition

194 Mich. App. 624 (1992) 487 N.W.2d 825 CORBETT v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO, INC Docket No. 130455. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided July 6, 1992, at 9:45 A.M. Rapaport, Pollok, Farrell & Sablich, P.C. (by Steven J. Pollok), for the plaintiff. Crippen, Urquhart, Cmejrek & Weber (by James R. Cmejrek

12 Ill. App.3d 559 (1973) 299 N.E.2d 521 J. JOSEPH CORBETT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEVON BANK et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 56690. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). June 25, 1973. *560 *561 *562

OPINION BY Judge LEADBETTER. Pennsylvania Social Services Union, Local 688 of the Service Employees International Union (Union), and Eugene Quaglia and Joel Levin, individually and on behalf of similarly situated employees, (collectively, Union), have filed a motion for partial summary judgment in their action against the Commonwealth, the Governor, the Secretary of Administration and the Secretary of Publi

GRAVES, Justice. This general statement of the nature and result of the suit below — not'contested as such by the appellee, but with a few purely formal interpolations by this court — is taken from the appellant’s brief: “The proponent (appellant) filed his application to probate what he declared to be the will of the late Judge Edward D. May, deceased, in the County Court of Galveston County, Texas