Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Corcoran v. Neal”
Corcoran v. Nealpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Joseph E. Corcoran v. Ron Nealpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. In 1997 Joseph Corcoran shot and killed four men at his home in Fort Wayne, Indiana. A jury convicted him .of four counts of murder and recommended the death penalty. The trial judge agreed and imposed a death sentence in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. After his appeals in state court had rim their course, Corcoran sought federal habeas relief on mu
Neal v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-2020V (to be published) ************************* SARAH NEAL and RICHARD C. NEAL * Special Master Corcoran parents of deceased infant, C.N., * * Petitioners, *
Corcoran v. Sessionspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Thomas Corcoran sues Jefferson B. Sessions, Attorney General of the United States;1 Thomas E. Brandon, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; William M. Pallozzi, Secretary of the Maryland State Police; and Brian Frosh, Attorney General for the State of Maryland.
Joseph E. Corcoran v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Dec 10 2024, 11:01 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Associated Press v. Ron Nealpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-2025 ASSOCIATED PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RON NEAL and LLOYD ARNOLD, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S
Associated Press v. Ron Nealpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-2025 ASSOCIATED PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RON NEAL and LLOYD ARNOLD, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S
Neal v. City of Kingmanpublic domain
169 Ariz. 133 (1991) 817 P.2d 937 Richard NEAL, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF KINGMAN, an Arizona, political subdivision; Board of Adjustment of the City of Kingman, Arizona, an administrative body, Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees. No. CV-90-0490-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. September 17, 1991. Dushoff & M
Corcoran-Hakala v. Dowdpublic domain
840 N.E.2d 286 (2005) 362 Ill. App.3d 523 298 Ill.Dec. 516 Mary B. CORCORAN-HAKALA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph P. DOWD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-05-0100. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. November 22, 2005. Rehearing Denied January 9, 2006. *288 Cha
Corcoran-Hakala v. Dowdpublic domain
No. 2--05--0100 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ MARY B. CORCORAN-HAKALA, ) Appeal from the
Paul M. McManus v. Ron Nealpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. An Indiana jury convicted Paul Mc-Manus of murdering his estranged wife and two young daughters, and the trial judge sentenced him to death in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed on direct appeal, but on postconviction review the trial judge found McManus intellectually disabled and thus ineligible for the death pen
Neal v. Sunset Grove Inc.public domain
HOUSE, P.J., This matter is before the court on preliminary objections filed by plaintiffs to defendant’s new matter. FACTS Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a complaint. They allege in the complaint that an employee of defendant served alcoholic beverages to the male plaintiff while visibly intoxicated and that, thus, defendant was in violation of the Liquor Code, 47 P.S.
Mr. Chief Justice Alvey, dissenting: The questions • presented on these appeals are of more than ordinary importance to the people of this District. They affect the manner of administering justice, as it has heretofore been administered in civil cases, by justices of the peace. The questions are, 1st. What is the nature and extent of the civil jurisdiction of the several justices of the peace, under the Constitu
Chase v. Corcoranpublic domain
Gray, J. The evidence introduced at the trial tended to prove the following facts: The plaintiff, while engaged with his *287own boats in the Mystic River, within the ebb and flow of the tide, found the defendant’s boat adrift, with holes in the bottom and the keel nearly demolished, and in danger of sinkn g or being crushed between the plaintiff’s boats and the piles of
Wu Tien Li-Shou v. United Statespublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. ■ Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KING joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Wu Tien Li-Shou, a citizen of Taiwan, seeks damages from the United States for the accidental killing of her husband and the intentional sinking of her husband’s fishing- vessel during a NATO counter-piracy mission.
Lyles v. Flagship Resort Development Corp.public domain
371 F.Supp.2d 597 (2005) Danielle LYLES, et al, Plaintiffs, v. FLAGSHIP RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 01-6118(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 19, 2005. *598 *599 Goldenberg, Mackler, Sayegh, Mintz, Pfeffer, Bonchi & Gill, Atlantic City,
Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si
State v. Hydepublic domain
OPINION ROBERT J. CORCORAN, Justice (Retired). David O’Neal Hyde (defendant) was convicted on two counts of first degree premeditated murder and one count of first degree burglary. Judge John H. Seidel sentenced defendant to death on each of the first degree murder convictions and to an aggravated 15-year sentence on the burglary conviction. All sentences were to run consecutively. This is an automatic appea
State v. Romanoskypublic domain
176 Ariz. 118 (1993) 859 P.2d 741 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. John Thomas ROMANOSKY, Appellant. No. CR-90-0105-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. October 5, 1993. Grant Woods, Atty. Gen., Phoenix, by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, for appellee. Neal W. Bassett, Phoenix, for appellant. OPINION</
State v. McKinneypublic domain
185 Ariz. 567 (1996) 917 P.2d 1214 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. James Erin McKINNEY, Appellant. STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Charles Michael HEDLUND, Appellant. Nos. CR-93-0362-AP, CR-93-0377-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. May 16, 1996. *571 Grant Woods, Attorney General by Paul J. McMu