Cases

Case: 18-10474 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-10474 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-01812-VEH MYRA CORLEY, CHARLES CO

688 F.Supp.2d 1315 (2010) Charles CORLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LONG-LEWIS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-01812-HGD. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. January 28, 2010. *1316 G. Patterson Keahey, Jr., Tracey C. Dotson, Law Offices of G. Patterson Keahey PC, James Arthur Butts, John D. Sa

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. When the Framers of the First Amendment prohibited Congress from making any law “abridging the freedom of speech,” they were not thinking about computers, computer programs, or the Internet. But neither were they thinking about radio, television, or movies. Just as the inventions at the beginning and middle of the 20th century presented new

316 Pa. Superior Ct. 327 (1983) 462 A.2d 1374 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. William N. CORLEY, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted February 10, 1983. Filed July 15, 1983. Petition for Allowance of Appeal Granted February 8, 1984. *330 L. Carter Anderson, Philadelphia, for

USCA11 Case: 22-12974 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2024 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12974 ____________________ JOSE PEREZ, ALFREDO SANTOS,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS No. 22-70002 BOARD, Petitioner, NLRB No. 32- CA-282957 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 2015, OPINION Intervenor, v. AAKASH, INC., DBA Park Central Care and Rehabilitation Center, Respondent. AAKASH, INC., DBA Park Central No. 22-70008

USCA11 Case: 22-10048 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2023 Page: 1 of 27 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10048 ____________________ EMERGENCY RECOVERY, INC., et al.,

USCA11 Case: 24-13766 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 09/12/2025 Page: 1 of 16 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-13766 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ CMYK ENTERP

USCA11 Case: 22-11389 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2023 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11389 ____________________ In re: ASSET ENHANCEMENT, INC.,

USCA11 Case: 21-13580 Document: 55-1 Date Filed: 02/16/2023 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13580 ____________________ In re: LORENZO ESTEVA,

Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation re Indefiniteness of '884, '651, & '715 Patents RON CLARK, District Judge. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, and he has recommended that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of indefindteness regarding United States Patent No. 6,271,884, U.S. Patent No. 6,838,651, and U.S. Patent No. 6

USCA11 Case: 21-11002 Date Filed: 05/24/2022 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11002 ____________________ WADLEY CRUSHED STONE COMPANY, LLC, an Alabama Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant, versu

FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge Plaintiffs, City of Rockford, Illinois, and Acument Global Technologies Inc., filed a second amended complaint (the "SAC") against two groups of defendants: (1) Mallinckrodt plc and Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc. *743(including its acquisition of "Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.") (collectively, "Mall

USCA11 Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/28/2020 Page: 1 of 148 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16486 & 16-16783 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S.

USCA11 Case: 24-10900 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 02/11/2026 Page: 1 of 43 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10900 ____________________ THOMAS O’NEAL,

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

USCA11 Case: 20-12622 Date Filed: 05/24/2021 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-12622 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cv-00543-MHH STARTLEY GENERAL CONTRA

617 F.Supp.2d 161 (2009) CITYSPEC, INC. and Bruno Tucci, Plaintiffs, v. M. Patricia SMITH, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor, Defendant. No. CV 07-1224. United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 18, 2009. *163 Campanelli & Associates, P.C., by: David A. Antwork, Esq., Mineola, NY, Andrew M. Cuomo,

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this premises liability case, following a full week of trial, the jury returned a verdict in excess of $4,000,000 in favor of the plaintiff, Ronnie Lee Lymas, for compensatory damages. The defendant, Double Quick, successfully moved to reduce the verdict based on the $1,000,000 statutory cap on noneconomic damages. Miss.Code Ann. § 11 — 1—60(b) (Rev.2002). Double Quic

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. DUFFIN, UNITED STATES Magistrate Judge I. Procedural History On April 18, 2012, relator Kurt Kroening filed the present action on behalf of the United States, 30 states, and the District of Columbia under the False Claims Act and similar state statutes. After a lengthy period for investigation, the United States filed notice on January 31, 2014, that it was n