Cases

[Cite as State v. Corn, 2023-Ohio-1407.] COURT OF APPEALS HOLMES COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon. John W. W

889 P.2d 234 (1994) 119 N.M. 199 Lisa CORN, Claimant-Appellant, v. NEW MEXICO EDUCATORS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and CIGNA Property and Casualty Companies, Respondents-Appellees. No. 14553. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. December 2, 1994. Cert. Denied January 17, 1995. *236 George Wright Weet

NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge. Secretary of the Treasury James Baker (in his official capacity on behalf of the United States), Citicorp International Co., Inc. (Citicorp), and RAJ Chemicals, Inc. (RAJ) appeal the decision of the Court of International Trade, No. 85-08-01151, 9 CIT 571, 623 F.Supp. 1262 (1985), arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction. Upon examination of the complete record and decisions below, th

636 F.Supp. 921 (1986) NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, New Energy Company of Indiana, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Ohio Farm Bureau Federation and A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, Plaintiffs, v. James A. BAKER III, Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, John M. Walker, Jr., Assistant Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, William Von Raab, Commissioner, United States Customs Service, and United States of Americ

840 F.2d 1547 9 ITRD 2153, 9 ITRD 2535, 6 Fed. Cir.(T) 104, 6 Fed. Cir. (T) [PG70 NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, New Energy Company ofIndiana, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Ohio FarmBureau Federation, and A.E. StaleyManufacturing Company,Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,v.James BAKER, III, Secretary, John M. Walker, Jr., AssistantSecretary, William Von Raab, Commissioner, United States o

Opinion for the court filed by Senior Judge BUCKLEY. BUCKLEY, Senior Judge: In 1995, John Latschar, the Superintendent of Gettysburg National Military Park (“Gettysburg”), instituted a program to curtail the over-browsing of wooded and crop areas by white-tailed deer in Gettysburg and the neighboring Eisenhower National Historic Site. The program provide

PER CURIAM: Petitioner-appellant Ronald Mask, a prisoner in state custody, appeals from a June 22, 1999 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denny Chin, Judge) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). See Mask v. McGinnis, No. 97 Civ. 7211, 1999 WL 401

61 Ill.2d 6 (1975) 329 N.E.2d 228 PIONEER HI-BRED CORN COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, Appellant. No. 46600. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed June 2, 1975. *7 *8 Justin A. Stanley, George W. Hamman, Robert A. Helma, Steven M. Ras

McLennan, P. J.: The two ordinances referred to must he considered together and their, provisions harmonized; otherwise the superintendent of buildings of the city of Htica cannot determine in what manner the important duties imposed upon him may be discharged. The building code and fire limits ordinance of the city of Utica are practically the same as exist in all other second class cities of the State. Their provisions are,

On the 10th of September, 1912, the relator applied to the superintendent of buildings of the city of Utica for permission to erect a building on Clinton place. The dimensions of the building were stated to be as follows: 110 feet wide, about 122 feet long and about 16 feet high, and it was to be placed on a lot 120 feet in width by 200 feet in depth. The application states that the building is "to be used and occupied for buying, selling, dealing in and otherwise disposing of vehicles, autom

COFFIN, Circuit Judge. Appellant, Clayton M. Bryant, asks us to reverse dismissal of his writ of habeas corpus. He claims two errors of constitutional dimension in his Massachusetts murder trial: admission of an involuntary oral confession made without the benefit of Miranda warnings, along with its “fruit”, a subsequent written confession, and ineffective as

54 F.Supp. 307 (1944) UNITED STATES v. CORN. Cr. No. 417. District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. February 14, 1944. B. J. Husting, U. S. Atty., and E. J. Koelzer, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff. William Kershaw, of Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant. DUFFY, District Judge. A jury having been waived, the defendant was tried befor

LIVELY, Circuit Judge. The petitioner Charles Edward Jenkins appeals from the district court’s denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner seeks release from the Kentucky State Penitentiary where he is serving two consecutive life sentences following his convictions of murder and armed robbery. He contends that the proceedings in the state court which r

Stewaet, J. Two questions are presented to us. The first question is whether the Court of Appeals *11erred in overruling Corn’s motions to dismiss the appeals of the board, its members, the department, and the director from the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas. The second question is whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgments of the

894 F.2d 257 52 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 123,52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,618, 58 Ed. Law Rep. 465 Jon KUEMMERLEIN and Mary Kuemmerlein, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOLDISTRICT, Donald A. Hafeman, Superintendent, MadisonMetropolitan School District and E. James Travis,Superintendent, Madison Metropolitan School District, assuccessor in office to Donald A.

OAKES, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question whether appellant was deprived of his due process right to a fair trial when the trial court refused to permit his counsel to question a defense witness regarding his confession to the same crimes for which appellant and his two codefendants were on trial. We answer the question in the affirmative and reverse the judgment of

6 Ill.2d 439 (1955) 128 N.E.2d 919 CORN PRODUCTS REFINING CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. — (CHARLES VAUGHN, Defendant in Error.) No. 33578. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed September 23, 1955. *440 CASSIDY, SLOAN & CASSIDY, of Peoria, for plaintiff in error.

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In September 1947 appellant Marguerite Carr was one of 1,638 pupils in Browne Junior High School, the rated capacity of which was 888 by the standards of the Board of Education and 783 by those of disinterested experts.1 The school had been for many years so overcrowded that it was on a two-shift schedule.2 Appellant compl

ROGERS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The receiver of an insolvent corporation sues to recover for the injury he *40claims the defendants inflicted upon the Improved Property Holding Company of New York, hereinafter called the company, by their fraudulent and negligent conduct while acting as directors thereof. This is the first of the two suits and will

CLARK, Circuit Judge (dissenting): The majority opinion adopts the premise that the result in this case is required by the prior decisions of the court and disavows any “retreat from that view.” With all deference, I view that disavowal as wholly unnecessary, since I see the result reached by the majority as nothing less than a headlong charge into an area which has