Cases

323 F.Supp.2d 606 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Martha STEWART and Peter Bacanovic, Defendants. No. 03 CR.717(MGC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 2004. *607 *608 Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg, P.C., New York, NY, By: Robert G. Morvillo, John J

208 P.3d 168 (2009) William S. BIGLEY, Appellant, v. ALASKA PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE, Appellee. No. S-13116. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 22, 2009. *172 James B. Gottstein, Law Project for Psychiatric Rights, Inc., Anchorage, for Appellant. Timothy M. Twomey, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, and Talis J. Colberg, Attorn

315 F.Supp.2d 120 (2004) Kevin BALL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.00-867(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 3, 2004. *121 Thomas J. Simeone, Simeone & Miller, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. David K. Monroe, Steven John Fellman, William Francis

641 N.E.2d 455 (1994) 161 Ill.2d 82 204 Ill.Dec. 231 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Paul S. ERICKSON, Appellant. No. 72667. Supreme Court of Illinois. July 28, 1994. Rehearing Denied October 3, 1994. *457 Rita A. Fry, Public Defender (Kyle Wesendo

557 P.2d 220 (1976) 276 Or. 1041 Mary ALMOND, Respondent, v. Frieda ANDEREGG, Appellant. Supreme Court of Oregon, Department No. 1. Argued and Submitted November 4, 1976. Decided December 16, 1976. *221 Donald C. Walker, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Phillip R. Muir, P

151 Cal.App.2d 96 (1957) F. M. SCHAFER et al., Respondents, v. WHOLESALE FROZEN FOODS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 17171. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. May 17, 1957. Leuenberger & Feldman, Philip S. Ehrlich and Irving Rovens for Appellants. Myers & Meehan for Respondents. WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Guy L. Roberts, the trustee, is a cousin to Orville J. Roberts, the beneficiary. Guy is a lawyer. The will of Mary M. Roberts, made in 1936, gave her estate to her daughter, Clara Zang, and her son, Orville, absolutely. December 8, 1944, testatrix executed a codicil which modified the will as follows: "2. It is my will that the name of Orville J. Roberts be entirely eliminated from my will as a Legatee, and that the name of Guy L. Roberts, as Trustee, be substituted in lieu thereof, wh

438 S.E.2d 501 (1993) 190 W.Va. 321 In the Matter of an INVESTIGATION OF the WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE CRIME LABORATORY, SEROLOGY DIVISION. No. 21973. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Report Submitted November 4, 1993. Opinion Decided November 10, 1993. *502 Alexander Ross, Sp. Pros. At

This appeal brings before us for construction a post-nuptial deed of settlement made by a third party to trustees under circumstances which are not fully disclosed by the record, but which are sufficient, with the concessions of fact made in the argument, to justify the inference that the unmarried nominal settlor, Elsie R. Crise, was selected for the purpose of having the real and personal property of Clarence L. Crise, together with the interest therein of his then wife, May F. Crise, conve

Cassoday, J. “ It seems to be the office of a trade-mark to point out the true source, origin or ownership of the *25goods to which, the mark is applied, or to point out and designate a dealer’s place of business, distinguishing it from the business locality of other dealers.” Marshall v. Pinkham, 52 Wis. 578, 88 Am. Rep. 758. Such trade-mark usually includ

Minshall, C. J. The case gives rise to the following questions, and, if any of them, cannot be *119answered in the negative, the judgment must be affirmed: 1. Is the award of the arbitrators the decision contemplated by the undertakings ? 2. Did the dismissal of the action by the consent of the parties estop the defendants from insistin