Cases

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

Justice BRISTER, joined by Justice MEDINA as to Part III, concurring. I disagree with the Court’s conclusion that defense counsel’s peremptory strikes were racially motivated. Neutral reasons were given for them but were not properly preserved, in part because the rules changed during this appeal. The difference between not having neutral reasons and merely not preserving them is no technicality; charges of

Opinion RICHMAN, J. — Pursuant to its statutory authority to adopt “rules of practice and procedure” (Pub. Util. Code, § 1701, subd. (a)), 1 the Public Utilities Commission (PUC or Commission) promulgated rule 1.1, which provides in pertinent part: “Any person who . . . transacts business with the Com

Filed 2/27/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN WAYNE REDFEARN, B270487 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC559822) v. TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, G

Filed 3/16/18 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN WAYNE REDFEARN, B270487 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC559822) v. ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION GLENN A. NORTON, Presiding Judge. American Cyanamid Company (“Company”) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Cortez Strong (“Plaintiff’) on Plaintiffs claims of products liability and negligent manufacture. Plaintiff cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to amend the judgment against Company to include prejudgment interest. He also appeals the judg

905 So.2d 465 (2005) Kenneth Paul ZIMKO and Rochelle Lacourrege Zimko v. AMERICAN CYANAMID, et al. No. 2003-CA-0658. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. June 8, 2005. Rehearing Denied July 15, 2005. *470 Mickey P. Landry, Frank J. Swarr, David R. Cannella, Landry & Swarr, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, fo

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0769 ══════════ Angela Horton and Kevin Houser, Petitioners, v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth D

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0769 ══════════ Angela Horton and Kevin Houser, Petitioners, v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth D

McKINSTER J. *162I. INTRODUCTION In its lawsuit against Hulven International, Inc. (Hulven) and various other defendants, PGA West Residential Association, Inc. (PGA West) alleged defendant Dempsey Mork1 tried to fraudulently insulate

Filed 9/24/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F076148, F076150 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 13CECG03374) v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS OPINION B

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge. On or about August 18, 2003, the defendant VistaCare, Inc. (“VistaCare”) hired the plaintiff Sharon Quick (“Quick”) as a registered nurse case manager. Plaintiffs Original Petition and Request for Disclosure (“Petition”) ¶ 6, attached to Defendant VistaCare, Inc.’s Notice of Removal (docket entry 1) as Exhibit A (docket entr

598 F.3d 592 (2010) COYOTE PUBLISHING, INC., dba High Desert Advocate; Howard Copelan, Publisher of the High Desert Advocate; Bobbi A. Davis, dba the Shady Lady Ranch; DR Partners, dba Las Vegas CityLife; Steve Sebelius, Editor of Las Vegas CityLife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ross MILLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Nevada; Catherine Cortez Masto, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nevad

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

104 F.Supp.2d 58 (2000) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.2000-936 RMU. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 30, 2000. *59 *60 Anne Wagner, American Federation of Government Employees, A

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 996 OPINION Derrick Lewis, an employee of Roseville Toyota, Inc., was driving a car owned by Roseville Toyota on a personal errand on his lunch break when he rear-ended a car stopped at a stoplight. The driver and passenger of such car, Jason and Amy Taylor (plaintiffs), filed an action against

616 F.Supp. 1445 (1985) Amparo FIGUEROA-OLMO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY, Evelester Noriega De Cortez, the conjugal partnership constituted by Evelester Noriega de Cortez and Dr. Gilberto Cortez Figueroa; ABC Insurance Company and XYZ Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendants. Milagros Contreras MERCED, Plaintiff-Count

53 Cal.App.4th 152 (1997) CONTRACTORS LABOR POOL, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WESTWAY CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents; AMERICAN BONDING CO., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B091490. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. February 28, 1997. *155 COUNSEL McDonough, Ho

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MORROW, District Judge. Plaintiff commenced this contract action on November 11, 2002, naming MGA Electronics, Inc., and Roger T. Featherston as defendants. After MGA filed for bankruptcy, the court granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint that asserted claims against Roger A. Featherston, MGA Midwest, LLC, RTF Associates, LLC, and Chandle

179 Conn. 415 (1980) CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY v. DOUGLAS COSTLE, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ET AL. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued October 12, 1979. Decision released January 1, 1980. COTTER, C. J., BOGDANSKI, PETERS, RUBINOW and DALY, JS. *416 Anthony M.