Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No. 22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-0171f0- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee, and BRANDON STUMP, an individual; RYAN STUMP, an individual; KEITH

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No.22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01710- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and BR

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 11, 2023 Decided August 18, 2023 No. 22-5313 ADRIAN DA COSTA AND JAYDE DA COSTA, APPELLANTS v. IMMIGRATION INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE AND UR M. JADDOU, DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, APPELLEES Consolidated wit

608 F.Supp.2d 477 (2009) CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK and Patricia J. Lancaster, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Buildings, Defendants. Atlantic Outdoor Advertising, Inc., Scenic Outdoor, Inc., Troystar City Outdoor LLC, and Willow Media, LLC., Plaintiffs, v. The City of New York, Patricia J. Lancaster, and Edward Fortier, Defendants. Metro Fuel LLC, Pl

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: In the wake of the Great Depression, Congress took measures to protect the U.S. economy from suffering another catastrophic collapse. Congress’s first step in that endeavor was the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act” or “Act”), ch. 38, 48 Stat. 74 (codified as amended at 15 U.S

OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: Table of Contents BACKGROUND . .459 I. Fannie and Freddie. .461 II.The Life of a Mortgage Loan. 4^ H A. Underwriting. 4^* O H B. Sampling. 4^-Oi bo C. Defendants’ Representations to Purchasers. 05 to D. Repurchase Obligations . 4^ W<

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Filed 11/20/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT KLEM, D070623 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2016-00004859- CU-BT-CTL) ACCESS INSURANCE COMPANY

Office of the Director New Mexico 08:13:29 2022.02.15 Compilation '00'07- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2022-NMSC-006 Filing Date: November 15, 2021 No. S-1-SC-37489 AMADO CHAVEZ, RAMONA HERNANDEZ, TODD LOPEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of EDGAR CHAVE

IKOLA, J. *490Plaintiff Jessica Ayon appeals from an adverse summary judgment in a personal injury case. Late one evening in May 2013, Brittini Zuppardo was driving home from her boyfriend's house while talking on the phone with Michelle Halkett. Zuppardo was defendant Esquire Deposition Solution's (Esquire) scheduling manager; Halkett was a co

653 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2009) CENTRAL DELTA WATER AGENCY and South Delta Water Agency, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. 1:09-CV-00861 OWW DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 8, 2009. *1071 Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Abbott & Kindermann, Sacramento, CA, f

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiff Hanna Bouveng brings this action against Defendants NYG Capital LLC, d/b/a New York Global Group (“NYGG”), FNL Media LLC (“FNL Media”), and Benjamin Wey alleging claims of (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment under the New York State Human Rights Law (the “NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL”) again

Susan L. Carney, Circuit Judge: *183We confront here primarily a question of legislative immunity raised by a mayor's inaction in the face of well-developed but extra-contractual expectations of the prospective developer of a low-income housing project. A real estate development team that included plaintiffs-appellants NRP Ho

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1822 Doc: 153 Filed: 02/11/2026 Pg: 1 of 69 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1822 KAREN LOWY, individually and as parent and next friend of N.T.; ANTONIO HARRIS, Plaintiff – Appellants,

MEMORANDUM Jones, II, District Judge. 1. Introduction Plaintiff Muriel Collins, a long-term employee of Kimberly-Clark Paper Company, commenced this action against her employer, alleging agents of the company violated her civil rights during the final years of her employment. In particular, Plaintiff claims Defendant Kimberly-Clark, by and through its agents, unlawfully discriminated again

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. Jaclyn Jurach sued, her former employer, Safety Vision, LLC, in state court. Jurach claimed that she was disabled, that Safety Vision failed to accommodate her disability, and that it fired her for discriminatory and retaliatory reasons. (Docket Entry No. 1, Ex. 2; Docket Entry No. 7, Ex. 4). Safety Vision timely removed, and after discovery, moved

17-783-cv NRP Holdings LLC v. City of Buffalo 17-783-cv NRP Holdings LLC v. City of Buffalo United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: January 31, 2018 Decided: February 20, 20

JORDAN, Circuit Judge. No one likes bad cell phone reception or slow streaming data on their smartphone, but that does not mean anyone wants a cellular antenna in their neighborhood, which is why there are zoning battles like the one central to this case. T Mobile Northeast LLC ("T Mobile"), a wireless telecommunications service provider, applied to the Zoning Boa

APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the majority/plurality opinion. In my view, only the instruction related to material adverse action in connection with plaintiffs retaliation claim is flawed. I find the district court properly instructed the jury on all other issues in this case.

Filed 6/12/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOLDEN DOOR PROPERTIES, LLC, D075328 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018-0001- 3324-CU-TT-CTL) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,