Cases

363 S.W.3d 308 (2009) 2009 Ark. 619 NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES OF ARKANSAS, LLC, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee. No. 09-343. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 10, 2009. *310 Kutak Rock LLP, by: Debby Thetford Nye, Heather L. Schmiegelow, and Brandon J. Massey, Little Rock, f

996 So.2d 667 (2008) Collette Josey COVINGTON, et al. v. McNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY, et al. No. 08-505. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 5, 2008. Rehearing Denied December 10, 2008. *669 James D. "Buddy" Coldwell, Attorney General, Adam L. Ortego, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Lake Charles,

REVISED APRIL 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 23, 2012 No. 09-60406

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JENNER & BLOCK LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-916 (JDB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In our constitutional order, few stars are as fixed as the principle that no official “can prescribe what shall be orthodox in polit

KING, Circuit Judge, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, E. GRADY JOLLY, W. EUGENE DAVIS, JERRY E. SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, CARL E. STEWART, EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges: For the third time, the en banc court is called upon to decide whether a public school student has stated a constitutional claim against her school for its failure to prot

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1820 ____________ BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; CENTER

OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, Chief Judge. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (“Tennessee Gas”) submitted applications to several federal and state agencies seeking approval to build an interstate pipeline. project. One such agency is the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“PADEP”), 1 wh

MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 3, 2016) COLLEÍEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge In this case, -Plaintiffs Huntco Pawn Holdings, LLC (“Huntco”) and the National Pawnbrokers Association (“NPA”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) challenge the decision of the United States Department of Defense (“Department”) to amend a regulation that places certain limitations on the credit that can be

Hunt, J. ¶1 Jo-Ann Fulton appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and dismissal of her gender discrimination claim under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), chapter 49.60 RCW. She argues that the superior court erred in ruling that she had failed to establish a prima facie case because (1) under analogous federal law, DSHS’s failure to post or to

654 F.Supp.2d 61 (2009) Rosezola SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of the Department of Defense, Defendants. C.A. No. 05-381 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 16, 2009. *65 Louise A. Herman, Patricia E. Andrews, Providence, RI, for Plaintiff. Ly T

811 F.Supp.2d 216 (2011) ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-2084 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 12, 2011. *221 Marc Rotenberg, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. John Arthur Verdi, Washington, D

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971 LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL 3:09-cv-02371- ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, IEG-BGS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defenda

RUIZ, Senior Judge: Petitioner D.C. Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, Inc. (Appleseed) seeks our review of the decision and order of the respondent, District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, and Banking (Department or DISB), determining that the 2008 surplus of intervenor, Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. (GHMSI), was not “excessive” for purposes of the Hospital and Medical Services Corpor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0946 (CKK) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0952 (CKK) DO

JUDGE BRIAN C. WIMES *1001Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 31). The Court, being duly advised of the premises, grants in part and denies in part said motion. BACKGROUND On April 17, 2018, Plaintiffs League of Women Voters of Missouri, St. Louis A. P

Concurrence by Judge Owens WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: *485It is no hyperbole to say that Dulce Garcia embodies the American dream. Born into poverty, Garcia and her parents shared a San Diego house with other families to save money on rent; she was even homeless for a time as a child. But she studied hard and excelled academical

11/18/2022 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 24, 2022 Session Heard at Nashville1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYSHON BOOKER Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108568 G. S

USCA11 Case: 22-14031 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 03/11/2025 Page: 1 of 112 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14031 ____________________ MICHAEL J. POLELLE,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-3179 ___________________________ State of Nebraska; State of Missouri; State of Arkansas; State of Iowa; State of Kansas; State of South Carolina Plaintiffs - Appellants