⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Craig v. CenturyLink, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE, One; JOHN DOE, Two; No. 19-15074 JOHN DOE, Three; JOHN DOE, Four; on behalf of themselves and all D.C. No. others similarly situated; JOHN DOE, 3:18-cv-01031- Five, EMC Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK, LLC; CAREMARK CALIFORNIA SPE
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-12-09 · Published · cited 82× · 982 F.3d 1204
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE, One; JOHN DOE, Two; No. 19-15074 JOHN DOE, Three; JOHN DOE, Four; on behalf of themselves and all D.C. No. others similarly situated; JOHN DOE, 3:18-cv-01031- Five, EMC Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK, LLC; CAREMARK CALIFORNIA SPE
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015-03-26 · Published · cited 6× · 528 B.R. 297
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. This Memorandum Opinion and Order addresses appeals from fifteen orders entered by the Bankruptcy Court in Adversary No. 10-08150, into which Adversary No. 10-03225 was consolidated. The two actions consolidated under Adversary No. 10-03150 were filed in response to a state court lawsuit filed on February 12, 2010, by aggrieved investors follo
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022-12-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR COLLECTOR OF WINCHESTER, ) No. ED109513 MISSOURI, AND CITY OF ) WINCHESTER, MISSOURI, ) ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) S
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-28 · Published · cited 8× · 901 F.3d 991
Briefs were filed by the following parties: CENTURYLINK, INC. and CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, LLC., Russell P. Hanser, Brian W. Murray, Ethan D. Jeans and Melissa L. Turcios of Washington, DC GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC; BT AMERICAS, INC.; and INCOMPAS, Markham Cho Erickson, Washington DC WINDSTREAM SERVICES, LLC and SPRINT CORPORATION, Christopher J. Wright, John T. Nakahata, Timothy J. Simeone, H
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-06-14 · Published · cited 83× · 423 U.S. App. D.C. 183; 825 F.3d 674; 64 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1663; 2016 WL 3251234; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10716
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 4, 2015 Decided June 14, 2016 No. 15-1063 UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL.,
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered November 17, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,159-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** THE
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 63× · 753 F.3d 1015; 60 Communications Reg. (P&F) 381; 2014 WL 2142106; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9637
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join virtually all of Chief Judge Bris-coe’s thorough, persuasive opinion. But, I respectfully dissent on Part IV(A)(2). There, the majority rejects the Petitioners’ challenge to the sufficiency of the budget for the Universal Service Fund. On this limited issue, I respectfully dissent. In my view, the FC
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 10× · 326 F. Supp. 3d 51
Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Dish Network, L.L.C.'s MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 20). For the following reasons, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND I. Procedural Context In this action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), Plaintiff Ross A. Mille
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018-12-20 · Published · cited 26× · 574 S.W.3d 444
Terry Jennings, Justice Appellants, Robert Kubbernus and Balaton Group, Inc. ("Balaton") (collectively, "appellants"), challenge the trial court's judgment, entered after a jury trial, in favor of appellees, ECAL Partners, Ltd., Draco Capital, Inc., Robert Mendel, as assignee of Edward Pascal, Robert Mendel, Robert Mendel, as assignee of Stanley Beraznik, Robert Mendel, as assignee of Don Bui, Robert Mendel, as assignee of Ben Ari
IN RE: FCC 11-161public domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 23, 2014 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court