Cases

PER CURIAM: Thomas Lynn Cramer, a Florida prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 2254 petition as time-barred. Cramer filed his petition after the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”); Pub.L. No. 104-32, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), and, therefore, the

USCA11 Case: 18-13524 Date Filed: 03/14/2022 Page: 1 of 182 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13524 ____________________ CROSLEY ALEXANDER GREEN, Petitioner-Appellee, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNE

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: The issue in this appeal is whether Mois-és Espinosa’s state petition for belated appeal tolled the one-year limitation period for filing a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A jury convicted Espinosa of two counts of sexual battery on a child and the state intermediate appellate court affirmed. Espinosa moved for state post-conviction

669 F.3d 1197 (2011) Billy Leon KEARSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondents-Appellees. No. 11-12267. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. November 3, 2011. Paul Edward Kalil (Court-Appointed), Craig Joseph Trocino (Court-Appointed), Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-Sou

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 3, 2011

USCA11 Case: 22-12354 Document: 41-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2025 Page: 1 of 48 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12354 ____________________ AILEEN MULLIN,

USCA11 Case: 22-12354 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 12/22/2025 Page: 1 of 49 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12354 ____________________ AILEEN MULLIN,

225 P.3d 881 (2010) In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Stephen D. CRAMER, an Attorney at Law (WSBA No. 9085). No. 200,674-4. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued September 15, 2009. February 11, 2010. *883 Stephen Christopher Smith, Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP, Boise, ID, for Petitione

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-19-00013-CV __________________ CHARLES MURRAY, Appellant V. C.I.A. HIDDEN FOREST, INC. AND NANCY CRAMER, Appellees ___________________________________________________

C. Johnson, J. ¶1 This case involves an attorney who, when faced with revocation of his business license by the Department of Revenue (DOR), notified DOR he was ceasing his business but instead re-formed his practice from a “PLLC” to an “Inc. PS” and continued to operate. The attorney failed to notify DOR of his new status and removed the revocation order posted at his office. The hearing officer and the Washington State Bar Ass

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals present the appellants’ vague and poorly articulated claims that a myriad of defendants discriminated against them on the basis of their disabilities-, in violation of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117 (1994), by complying with the terms of Florida’s workers’ compensation stat

33 F.Supp.2d 1342 (1999) Brett CRAMER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lawton CHILES, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Florida, et al., Defendants. No. 96-6619-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. January 8, 1999. *1343 *1344 Marvin C. Gutter, Ellen M. Saiderman, Juliett

FILED June 14, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term _______________ FILED November 6, 2020 No. 20-0043 released at 3:00 p.m. _______________ EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-113V (to be published) ************************* EVANS JOHNSON, * * Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, *

Cohen, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to petitioners’ Federal income taxes as follows: Richard A. and Alice D. Cramer Docket No. 27682-90 Additions to tax Year Deficie

6 A.3d 589 (2010) Gerald MARTIN, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs May 28, 2010. Decided August 20, 2010. Publication Ordered October 27, 2010. *590 Anthony T. McBeth, Harrisburg, for petitioner. Terrance M. Edwards, Asst. Counse

KING, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff-appellant Buddy Cramer (Cramer) asserts that the International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1979, Pub.L. No. 96-192, § 29, 94 Stat. 35 (1980) (Love Field amendment), which restricts interstate air service from Love Field Airport (Love Field) in Dallas, Texas, abridges his constitutional rights of free speech and interstate travel. Th

7 A.3d 346 (2010) John McCARTHY t/d/b/a McCarthy Tire Service Co., Inc. (O.I.S. B238) v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant. No. 89 C.D. 2010. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs June 11, 2010. Decided November 5, 2010. *348 Abby N. Trovinger, Certified Legal

6 A.3d 1 (2010) Bryan Keith ROOP, Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING. No. 64 C.D. 2010. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs July 2, 2010. Decided August 18, 2010. Publication Ordered October 14, 2010. Timothy P. Wile, Lansdale, for appellant.