Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Crawford v. State Farm LLoyds”
NUMBER 13-18-00129-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ISRAEL SALINAS AND HILDA SALINAS, Appellants, v. STATE FARM LLOYDS AND TRUMAN DALE CREWS, Appellees. On appeal from the 92nd District
Justice v. State Farm Lloyds Insurance Co.public domain
CONCURRING OPINION KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice. I respectfully concur. Breach of Contract Claim Against State Farm1 The insurance policy in issue (a form of HO-B policy approved in Texas) contains the following exclusion: “We do not cover loss caused by: rust, rot, mold, or other fungi.” Appellants claim that even though their insurance po
in Re: State Farm Lloyds, Inc.public domain
Becker v. State COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) ) ) IN RE: ) No. 08-05-00054-CV ) STATE FARM LLOYDS, INC.,
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloydspublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00248-CV <
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloydspublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00070-CV <
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloydspublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00107-CV <
In Re CYPRESS TEXAS LLOYDSpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Cypress Texas Lloyds (“Cypress”), seeks to compel the trial court to withdraw its order denying Cypress’s motion to abate the underlying litigation and to require the real party in interest, Patricia Ma
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloydspublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00107-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE CYPRESS TEXAS LLOYDS On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes1 By
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloydspublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00248-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE CYPRESS TEXAS LLOYDS On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes1 By
Larry Justice, Beth Justice and Karen Justice v. State Farm Lloyds Insurance Company and FTI/SEA Consultingpublic domain
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed January 15, 2008 Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed January 15, 2008. In The Fourteen
Boma O. Allison v. Service Lloyds Insurance Companypublic domain
OPINION KEM THOMPSON FROST, Chief Justice. This ease arises out of a dispute between a worker’s compensation insurance carrier and the employee-claimant’s attorney. The carrier asserted that it was entitled to receive the full amount of a settlement with a third party obtained by the claimant’s attorney, without paying the attorney any amount as attorney’s
STATE EX REL. STATE FARM MUT. v. Bedellpublic domain
719 S.E.2d 722 (2011) STATE of West Virginia ex rel. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Honorable Thomas A. BEDELL, Judge of the Circuit Court of Harrison County; Lana S. Eddy Luby; and Carla J. Blank, Respondents. No. 35738. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 25, 2011. Decided April 1, 2011.
716 F.Supp.2d 633 (2010) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, SYNDICATE 242 et al., Plaintiffs, v. TURTLE CREEK PARTNERSHIP, LTD. d/b/a Turtle Creek Apartments et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:08-cv-3044. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 14, 2010. *635 Francis I. Spagnoletti, John Patrick Abbey, Spagno
DAVIS, Justice: The petitioner herein, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”), requests this Court to issue a writ of prohibition to prevent the Circuit Court of Harrison County from enforcing its October 25, 2010, Protective Order. By the terms of that order, the circuit court restricted the manner in which State Farm would be permitted to use the medical records of the respon
Crawford v. Guideone Mutual Insurancepublic domain
420 F.Supp.2d 584 (2006) Adam CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. GUIDEONE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 504CV313C-ECF. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division. February 21, 2006. *585 *586 *587 Damon C. Richards, Fargason Booth St.
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0676 ══════════ Steve Huynh, Individually; Yvonne Huynh, Individually; Huynh Poultry Farm, LLC d/b/a Steve Thi Huynh Poultry Farm d/b/a Huynh Poultry Farm; T & N Poultry Farm, LLC; Thinh Bao Nguyen, Individually; Timmy Huynh Poultry Farm; Timmy Huynh, Individually; and Sanderson Farms, Inc., Petitioners,
Crawford v. Infinity Insurancepublic domain
139 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2001) Jolene CRAWFORD and Leonardo Santiago, Plaintiffs, v. INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a Infinity Insurance Group, a Florida Corporation, Defendant. No. 97-CV-0088-B. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. March 30, 2001. *1227 *1228 Robert N. Williams, P. Richard M
David Gordan Schmidt (d/B/A ABC Bonding Company) and Greenbrier Equities, LLC v. Brenda Crawfordpublic domain
Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIER EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE
Yonter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.public domain
JjTHOMAS F. DALEY, Judge. Plaintiff, Samuel M. Yonter, appeals a judgment granting defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Exception of No Cause of Action. On appeal, we affirm. This suit was filed as a result of an automobile accident that occurred on April 6, 1995, between plaintiff, Samuel Yonter, and Lloyd Crawford. The claim against Mr. Crawford was settled. Yonter filed this suit
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 12, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00024-CV MOHAMMED KHAN, Appellant V. SAFECO SURPLUS LINES, CRAWFORD & COMPANY, AND GARY WHIGHTSIL, Appellees On Appeal from the 240th District Court