Cases

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In 2010, Congress passed the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), a law aimed at reducing tax evasion by United States taxpayers holding funds in foreign accounts. FATCA imposes account-reporting requirements (and hefty penalties for noncompliance) on both individual taxpayers and foreign financial institutions (FFIs). F

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 534 OPINION Appellants the State of Texas; the City of Houston, Texas; and the Transit Authority of Houston, Texas (collectively, the "State") sued appellees Steve Crawford and Robert Wills, as responsible individuals, for the sales tax liability of S.L. Crawford Const

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER SEEFRIED, Case No. 21-cr-287 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Did the electoral certification on January 6, 2021 involve the “administration of justice”? The answer determines whether significant sentencing enh

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VICENTE PALACIOS CRAWFORD, No. 17-16942 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:15-cv-00001 v. OPINION ANTONIO B. WON PAT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, GUAM; EDDIE BAZA CALVO; RICARDO C. DUENAS, GIAA Board Chairman; ANTHONY

Case: 22-1832 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 08/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KATANA RACING, INC., DBA WHEEL & TIRE DISTRIBUTORS, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1832 ______________________

Judge Berman dissents in a separate opinion. Per Curiam: This is an unusual insider trading case, in that defendant-appellant Sean Stewart does not contest that he provided material, nonpublic information to his father, Robert Stewart. Rather, Sean readily acknowledges that "he was very close to his father, routinely confided in him, and even occasionally mentioned potential deals," and that his father and others t

17‐593 United States v. Stewart UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: February 26, 2018 Decided: November 5, 2018)

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17‐1650, 17‐2854, 17‐2858, 17‐2877, 17‐2899, 17‐2917, 17‐2918, 17‐2931, 17‐3063, & 17‐3449 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BYRON BROWN, et al., Defendants‐Appellants.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17‐1650, 17‐2854, 17‐2858, 17‐2877, 17‐2899, 17‐2917, 17‐2918, 17‐2931, 17‐3063, & 17‐3449 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BYRON BROWN, et al., Defendants‐Appellants.

FILED 15-0131 2/17/2015 1:27:24 PM tex-4174474 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CL

OPINION KUGLER, United States District Judge This lawsuit for medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act stems from the care and treatment of Plaintiff Tamika Young (“Young”) during the end of her pregnancy and delivery of J.Y., her child. Young was treated at Cooper University Hospital (“CUH”) by doctors employed by CUH (collectively, the “Cooper Defendants”), and by doctors employed by CAMcar

DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the Government's Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture Against Defendant Mongol Nation ("Mot. for POF") (Dkt. 354) and the Mongol Nation's post-trial motions. The Court heard oral arguments on February 28, 2019. On December 13, 2018, the jury returned a verdict finding the Defendant Mongol Nation, an unincorporated association, guilty of (1) subs

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0233p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint

OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge A jury has convicted the defendant, a top official of a public utility, of corruption and tax fraud charges. She has moved for acquittal notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternatively for a new trial before a different jury. For the reasons hereafter explained, I will deny her motions. In summary, I hold that the government presente

RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2023-SC-0235-DG BILL DUNN, MCCRACKEN COUNTY APPELLANT PROPERTY VALUATION ADMINISTRATOR ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2022-CA-0399 MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT NO. 21-CI-00191 SOLOMON FOUNDATION; AND APPELLEES K

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-52T Filed: May 20, 2022 ________________________________________ ) PERFECT FORM MANUFACTURING LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The United States initiated this suit to recover funds under Section 8132 of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (“FECA”), 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq., from defendant Michael D.J. Eisenberg, who is an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and is p

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 11, 2011, the Petitioner Barry Drayer (the “Petitioner”), pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Petitioner, who is presently incarcerated and serving a sentence of 138 months followed by supervised release for a term of three years, claims that his trial counsel were ineffective. He also