Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. Introduction Before this Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Certification (Doc. 223) of a class conditionally certified under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and affiliated Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Conditionally Certified Class (Doc. 215). The Motions have been fully briefed (see D

789 F.Supp.2d 819 (2011) Robert N. CREELY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HCR MANORCARE, INC., et al., Defendants. Sandra Conteh, Plaintiff, v. Atrium Centers, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case Nos. 3:09 CV 2879, 3:10 CV 417, 3:10 CV 2200, 10 CV 270. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 9, 2011. *820 Ga

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Paulina Korenblum, Fredy Giron, and Kenneth M. Butler bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York State Labor Law (“NYLL”), N.Y. Lab, Law § 650 et seq. (See Compl. (Docket No. 1). Plai

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs Michelle Creal, Kasandra Murphy, and Felicia Wright (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this three-count action in June 2013 against Defendant Group 0, Inc. (“Group 0”) seeking overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 Ü.S.C. § 201 et seq. (Count I) and Illinois wage laws (Counts II and III). Plaintiffs allege t

ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Facilitate Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Doc. 31).1 Defendant Wood Group Mustang, Inc. CWGM” or “Defendant”), responded to the Motion to Certify (Doc. 40), and Plaintiff replied in support (Doc. 41). Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Equitable Tolling (Doc. 48). Defendant respond

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge. This is a nationwide collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and an Illinois state law putative class action based on the application of an automatic 30-minute meal break deduction policy without ensuring that employees do not work through all or part of their meal break.

ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., Chief Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Darryl Long’s Motion for Condi*297tional Class Certification and Court Authorized Notice under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). (Doc. No. 43). For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED.

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Alex Watson and Anthony Gordon have filed a Motion for Conditional Class Certification and CourL-Authorized Notice (Docket No. 52) (“Motion to Certify”), to which the defendants filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 59). BACKGROUND Advanced Distribution Services, LLC (“Advanced”) empl

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiffs are 20 “Premise Technicians” who have brought this collective action against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to recover unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiffs contend that time spent as union representatives during various meetings and activities should be counted for purposes of calculating overtime pa

In the United States Court of Federal Claims PETRINA SMITH, Plaintiff, No. 19-cv-1348 v. Filed: October 15, 2021 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Lisa Brevard, The Markham Law Firm, San Diego California. With her on the briefs are David R. Markham and Maggie Realin, The Markham Law Firm, San Diego Cal

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE (Doc. 2); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 14); (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE (Doc. 15); (4) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 16); AND (5) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY (Doc. 17) Timothy S. Black, United States D

OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Issuance of Notice (Doc. 6); Motion for Reconsideration of the Magis*887trate Judge’s Order denying granting Defendants’ motion to compel discovery (Doc.

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' class and collective claims (ECF No. 43) and Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)

In the United States Court of Federal Claims PETRINA SMITH, Plaintiff, No. 19-1348 (Filed: December 2, 2022) v. FLSA collective action; THE UNITED STATES, conditional certification; notice; equitable tolling

JOHN T. FOWLKES, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *811Before the Court are several filings by the parties including: Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Claims of the California Opt-In Plaintiffs filed on December 22, 2016 to which Plaintiff responded on February 9, 2017. (ECF Nos. 229, 245 & 246.) On July 13, 2017, Defe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the motion of plaintiffs, Kelly Waggoner and Darbey Schultz, seeking conditional certification of a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 etseq. (Doc. No. 20 [“Mot.”]). U.S. Ban-corp and U.S. Bank National Association (collectively referred to as “defendant” or “U.S. Bank”

JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Conditional Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. , Collective Action Certification and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 Class Certification

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF AN FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiffs in this action are former non-exempt employees of Defendants Acosta Sales, LLC, and Acosta, Inc. (together, “Acosta,” or “Defendants”), who provided various merchandising services to food a

JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) appeals the order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting Plaintiff Robert J acobsen’s (J acobsen) motion for class certification. W e affirm the class certification but modify the certified class relief on remand. ISSUES<

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James McCarthy v. Civil No. 1:21-cv-668-JL Opinion No. 2023 DNH 039 Medicus Healthcare Solutions, LLC MEMORANDUM ORDER At issue in this Fair Labor Standards Act collective action suit is the correct standard under which to evaluate a motion for condit