Cases

BEASLEY, Judge. Ronald and Paulette Crocker, as co-administrators of the Estate of Regan Elizabeth Crocker, (Plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s • grant of summary judgment to H. Peter Roethling, M.D. (Dr. Roethling) and Wayne Women’s Clinic, P.A. (the clinic). For the following reasons, we affirm. On 14 September 2001, Paulette Crocker (Mrs. Crocker) was admitted to Wayne Memorial Hospital (Wayne M

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gregory R. Schaaf, Bankruptcy Judge The Complaint filed by the United States Trustee seeks denial of the Debtor’s discharge based on one or more of the following grounds: Count 1 and Count 3— fraudulent transfer and/or concealment under § 727(a)(2); Count 2 — false oath(s) under § 727(a)(4); Count 4 — failure to explain a loss or deficiency of assets (§ 727(a)(5)); and Count 5 — failure

675 S.E.2d 625 (2009) Ronald CROCKER and Paulette Crocker as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Reagan Elizabeth Crocker v. H. Peter ROETHLING, M.D. and Wayne Women's Clinic, P.A. No. 374PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 1, 2009. *627 The McLeod Law Firm, P.A., by Joe McLeod; and Law Offices of Wade E. Byrd, P.A., by Wad

562 N.W.2d 833 (1997) 252 Neb. 462 Marjorie KENT, Personal Representative of The Estate of Roy L. Kent, deceased, Appellant, v. Louis L. CROCKER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rosalie Crocker, Deceased, Appellee. No. S-95-657. Supreme Court of Nebraska. May 9, 1997. *835 Lawrence H. Yost, of Yos

852 F.Supp. 1322 (1994) Joseph CROCKER, Louis Duplantis, Roman Duronsolet, Sr., Arthur Evans, Willie Jackson, Nelson Laborde, Dean Mefferd, Colbert Ordoyne, Lester Plaisance, Louis Rodriguez v. BORDEN, INC., et al. Civ. A. Nos. 94-1303 to 94-1313. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. May 6, 1994. *1323 Stephen Barnett Mu

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE IN THE MATTER OF: ) No. ED109179 LILY ANN CROCKER ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis

OPINION REBECA HUDDLE, Justice. Frabon Crocker was convicted of aggravated robbery. This Court reversed, and Crocker waived a jury trial on remand. The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to forty-five years in prison. In this appeal, Crocker contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated, that the State engaged in vindictive prosecuti

USCA11 Case: 18-14682 Date Filed: 04/20/2021 Page: 1 of 67 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14682 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cv-14162-RLR JAMES P. CROCKER,

585 S.W.2d 337 (1979) Rita Rochelle LEVESCY, Appellant, v. James F. CROCKER, Appellee. No. 19979. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas. June 27, 1979. Rehearing Denied August 7, 1979. *338 Warren Hays, Law Offices of Jack Napier, Dallas, for appellant. Toby L. Gerber, Berman, Fichtner & Mitchell, Da

RONALD CROCKER and PAULETTE CROCKER as Co-Administrators of the Estate of REAGAN ELIZABETH CROCKER, Plaintiffs, v. H. PETER ROETHLING, M.D. and WAYNE WOMEN'S CLINIC, P.A., Defendants. No. COA06-802-2 Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed July 3, 2007 This case not for publication The McLeod Law Firm, P.A., by William W. Aycock, Jr., and Law Offices of Wade E. Byrd,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BOCA RATON COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Appellant, v. CROCKER DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, Appellee. No. 4D21-873 [February 9, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Lisa S. Sm

CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. This appeal arises from a breaeh-of-contract action between Mare Daniels, Sandra Daniels, Crocker & Associates, Inc., and Maxx Investments, LLC (collectively, “the Danielses”) and Dennis Crock-er, Gail Crocker and Crocker, Ltd. (collectively, “the Crockers”). The Danielses entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with t

JOINER, Senior District Judge. On May 21, 1987, Arnold’s Electric Company and its partners, Mitchell and Kathy Arnold, filed a petition for bankruptcy pursuant to Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 701, et seq. (West 1979 & Supp.1990). Samuel Crocker was appointed trustee (Trustee) for the estate, and on October 28, 1987, the Trustee filed a complaint against Braid Electric Company (Braid

782 F.Supp.2d 760 (2010) Harold S. CROCKER, Jr., and Anna Bodnar, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. KV PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 4:09-CV-198 (CEJ). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. March 24, 2010. *763 Ellen M. Doyle, John Stember, Stephen M

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2000 FED App. 0098P (6th Cir.) File Name: 00a0098p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ ;  RANDAL CROCKER,  Plaintiff-Appellant,

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This case presents the question of whether the United States Court of Federal Claims may hear a claim that personal property was unlawfully seized and forfeited. The plaintiff is proceeding pro se. The matter is presently before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a cla

PER CURIAM. Annie Lou Crocker appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 95-CV-696, dismissing her claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. Background, The Scott County, Mississippi, Sheriffs Department seized $132,349.69

687 F.Supp. 448 (1988) CHARMGLOW PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MITCHELL STREET STATE BANK, First Wisconsin Northwestern National Bank of Milwaukee, and Hambro, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-C-1207. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 10, 1988. Fred A. Erchul, II, Lichtsinn, Haensel, Bastian, Erchul & Crocker, Milwaukee, Wis., and Donald Flayton

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Randal Crocker charges that the United States Postal Service refused to hire him due to his disability, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Crocker pled both disparate treatment and disparate impact causes of action below, arguing that he was able to perform the essential functions of the position he sought despite

623 F.Supp. 963 (1985) Ottis B. CROCKER, Jr., et al. Plaintiffs, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff/Intervenor, v. W.P. McMULLAN, et al. Defendants. Civ. A. No. J84-0603(B). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. December 4, 1985. *964 Grady F. Tollis