Cases

[Cite as Crockett Homes, Inc. v. Tracy, 2024-Ohio-1464.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CARROLL COUNTY CROCKETT HOMES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross Appellant, v. THEODORE TRACY et

Crockett v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 02524) Crockett v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 02524 Decided on April 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. DANIEL BREEN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION On October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff, Jerry A. Nance, brought this action against the Defendant, Crockett County, Tennessee (the “County”), alleging violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 193

Justice KETCHUM: The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia has submitted a certified question to this Court arising from a dispute between an automobile manufacturer, General Motors LLC (“General Motors”), and an automobile dealer, King Coal Chevrolet Company (“King Coal”). The issue before us is whether General Motors was required by W.Va.Code § 17A-6A-12(2) [2007] to provide King Coal with

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

*1005 ORDER DONALD S. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. James E. Butler, Jr. represented numerous plaintiffs who brought products liability actions against General Motors in state and federal court. One of these actions was Cameron v. General Motors Corp., from whi

906 P.2d 718 (1995) Chad RUSS and Laura Russ, Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and Fairway Chevrolet, a Nevada corporation, Respondents. No. 26114. Supreme Court of Nevada. November 30, 1995 *719 Crockett & Myers and Eleissa C. Lavelle, Las Vegas, for Appellants. Greg W. Marsh, Las Veg

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT February 28, 1997 ______________ No. 94-1011 ______________ O R D E R In Re: General Motors Corporation James E. Butler, Jr. represented numerous plaintiffs who brought products liabil

836 P.2d 818 (1992) Barbara L. CROCKETT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Craig R. CROCKETT, Defendant and Appellee. No. 910518-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. August 7, 1992. *819 David S. Dolowitz (argued), Cohne, Rappaport & Segal, P.C., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant. Mark O. Van Wagoner (argued), Kristin G.

713 So.2d 802 (1998) Carlos B. CROCKETT and Liz Crockett v. Ilda CARDONA, et al. No. 97-CA-2346. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 20, 1998. *803 Stephen C. Juan, New Orleans, for Plaintiffs/Appellees. Christopher L. Lawler, Joseph F. d'Aquin, III, Donovan & Lawler, Metairie, for Defendants/Appellants.<

Farrington, J. This was an action of replevin heard, without jury, by the presiding Justice at the November Term, 1928, of the Penobscot County Superior Court. Right of exceptions to matters of law reserved by both parties. Defendant pleaded the general issue and for a brief statement that (1) defendant had possession of the replevied automobiles by license and permission of the plaintiff and that no demand for possession was ma

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2310 LANDSCAPE PROPERTIES, INC., * DEBTOR IN POSSESSION * * Plaintiff * * C. RICHARD CROCKETT; * Appeal from the United C

741 S.W.2d 717 (1987) Brandon Noel CROCKETT, by his next friend Victoria CROCKETT, and Victoria Crockett, individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. David S. SCHLINGMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. WD 38686. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 20, 1987. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Denied December 1, 1987. Application to

OPINION {¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Defendant-Appellant, Crockett Homes, Inc., appeals the decision of the Columbiana County Court of Common Pleas that lifted a stay of proceedings pending arbitration. On appeal, Crockett Homes argues that the arbitration provision was valid and enforceable and, theref

162 Mich. App. 511 (1987) 413 N.W.2d 444 FLYNN v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Docket No. 87548. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided May 20, 1987. MacDonald, Fitzgerald & MacDonald, P.C. (by R. Duncan MacDonald), for plaintiff. Evans & Nelson, P.C. (by John J. Hays and Willard W. Wallace), for de

Terry Crabtree, Judge. This is an appeal from an order of summary judgment dismissing appellant, James Crockett’s, complaint brought under the Arkansas Civil Rights Act against his former employer, appellee Counseling Services of Eastern Arkansas. Appellant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in concluding that he failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination. We affirm.

HICKS, Circuit Judge. These suits were brought by plaintiffs and other employees of defendants. Originally the complaint sought to recover alleged unpaid wages for overtime work such as “walking time” and other activities preliminary to actual work, and for liquidated damages and attorney’s fees, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., as interpreted in Anderson v. Mount Clemens Pottery Co., 32

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 169 F. 2d 266.

440 F.Supp.2d 1184 (2006) CROCKETT & MYERS, LTD., a Nevada Corporation, and J.R. Crockett, Jr., Esq., an individual, Plaintiffs, v. NAPIER, FITZGERALD & KIRBY, LLP, a New York limited liability law partnership, and Brian P. Fitzgerald, Esq., an individual, Defendants. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLP, a New York limited liability law partnership, and Brian P. Fitzgerald, Esq., an individual, Counterclaimants, v. Crockett &a;

By Judge Harry T. Taliaferro, m In this case, owners of adjacent waterfront parcels on Carters Creek seek apportionment of their riparian rights. Background The plaintiff acquired land from the Howard H. Barrack Estate (“ the Barrack property” ) by Deed dated January 12,2000, recorded in the Clerk’s Office of this Court in Deed Book 427, at Page 779. A plat prepared by Charl