Cases

Affirmed as Reformed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 13, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00375-CR LILLION DICK CRUSE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas T

06/22/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 19, 2020, at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JIMMY M. CRUSE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 18-836 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING LANE’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. #12) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 11) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT LANE WAS NOT DISABLED PRIOR TO JANUARY 14, 2009; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Plaintiff Theresa L. Lane (“Lane”) brought this action pursuant

92 Ill. App.3d 884 (1981) 416 N.E.2d 710 CAROL CRUSE, Adm'r of the Estate of Angela M. Norder, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM E. HINES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 80-97. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion filed January 26, 1981. *885 Robert D. McKnelly and Leonard Sacks, both of Wat

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS D.R. BEELER, BEVERLY ANN BEELER, AND DONALD R. BEELER, JR., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. WILLIAM CRUSE FUQUA, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS D.R. BEELER, BEVERLY ANN § BEELER, AND DONALD R. BEELER, No. 08-10-00016-CV JR., § Appeal from the Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

279 So.2d 802 (1973) Ada Faye WHITEHEAD et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lacy CRUSE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his minor son, Fred C. Cruse, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 12119. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 12, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1973. W

Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 16, 1973, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree held in abeyance pending hearing and determination by the Trial Justice, to whom the case is remanded, as to the reasonableness of the trial delay herein. Defendant was arrested on December 23, 1971 and indicted on February 3, 1972. Before commencement of the trial on January 16, 1973, defendant present

This suit was brought by appellees against appellants and others who are not parties to this appeal, on the 20th day of November, 1911, to recover the 388 acres of land involved in this appeal, and other land, not necessary to be mentioned in this opinion, as the title to the same is not involved by this appeal. The appellants are the heirs of R. N. Dicken, to whom U. M. Gilder conveyed the said 388 acres of land on the 16th day of October, 1863. The appellees are the heirs of Win. Minter, fr

SAVOY, Judge. This action, involving a non-collision accident, was brought by plaintiff, the owner of one truck, against the owner and liability insurance carrier of another truck. Plaintiff’s petition alleges that at about noon on August 24,-1964, his truck, a tractor-trailer unit being driven by his .employee, Joseph E. Roberts, was proceeding in a northerly direction on U. S. Plighway 165 about two to

233 Md. 10 (1963) 194 A.2d 803 BONHAGE ET AL. v. CRUSE ET AL. [No. 15, September Term, 1963.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided November 12, 1963. The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ. Gordon C. Murray for appellants. No brief and no appearance for appellees.

72 S.E.2d 835 (1952) 236 N.C. 400 WARD v. CRUSE et al. No. 381. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 5, 1952. *836 Ottway Burton, Asheboro, for plaintiff appellant. H. M. Robins, Asheboro, for defendant appellees. BARNHILL, Justice. The record on the former appeal, Ward v. Cruse,

WALKER, Justice. Two appeals are before us from the judgment rendered in this suit by the District Court of Jefferson County. The suit was brought to construe the will of Mrs. Mattie F. Cruse and to procure other relief. By dismissal, pursuant to an agreement of the parties, issues other than those made on the construction of the will were dropped from the case; and the subject matter of the appeals befor

456 P.2d 296 (1969) CHERRY LANE FARMS OF MONTANA, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gilbert CARTER, as Treasurer of Gallatin County, et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. 11607. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted June 9, 1969. Decided July 1, 1969. Morrow, Nash & Sedivy, James H. Morrow, Jr., and Edmund P. Sedivy, (argued), Bozeman, for plain

Paul Gau filed this suit in the district court of Jefferson county against W. A. Meagher, T. F. Meagher, S. H. Van Wormer, and W. W. Cruse, to recover upon a promissory note for $1,000 executed by T. F. Meagher, in which it was alleged that the other defendants became principal obligors upon the note by reason of their having executed the same before delivery, which said note was alleged to be due and unpaid, and plaintiff sought to recover the principal and interest due thereon, together wit

703 F.Supp.2d 639 (2010) Ingrid FISHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HALLIBURTON, et al., Defendants. Reginald Lane, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Halliburton, et al., Defendants. Kevin Smith-Idol, Plaintiff, v. Halliburton, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. H-05-1731, H-06-1971, H-06-1168. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 25, 201

696 F.Supp.2d 710 (2010) Ingrid FISHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HALLIBURTON, et al., Defendants. Reginal Lane, Plaintiff, v. Halliburton, et al., Defendants. Kevi Smith-Idol, Plaintiff, v. Halliburton, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. H-05-1731, H-06-1971, H-06-1168. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 8, 2010.

390 S.E.2d 142 (1990) 326 N.C. 421 STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Lane WISE. No. 161PA89. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 5, 1990. *144 Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Ellen B. Scouten, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State-appellant. Cruse and Spence by Thomas K. Spence and Kenneth B.

JOHNSON, Judge. The State’s prosecuting witness testified to the following: Defendant is the step-uncle and neighbor of the prosecutrix. On 14 June 1986, defendant asked the prosecutrix to come to his house to babysit. When she arrived he asked her to accompany him to a storage building about five minutes away by car to help him pick up something. Defendant’s two-year-old son went with the two to the warehouse, but remained as

[Cite as State v. Midkiff, 2023-Ohio-1835.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2022-CA-62 : v.