⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Crystal Murray Green”

Texas Supreme Court · 2015-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
D+;Q_-e,\\ a \_ 0 m ' * » ~ ER\P\=_ALS `P~‘>‘ %c>\ \;L;>><>%5 cav‘;m_$¢m:m Abel Acosta, Cferk \\\\SY:_N§YE`I;A S` r\%q\\ ,F\E Y~TK`\¢>~X Q<)\»\~v~<% C/c\%‘€»:“`~ \9`5 ‘\Lv$%~ § TD § \~\'0 \Aofgz@§¢\
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2018-09-20 · Published · cited 1× · 335 F. Supp. 3d 1124
Kristine G. Baker, United States District Court Judge Before the Court is defendants Rudolf Galan, Adriana Galan, and Crystal Queen, Inc.'s (collectively, "Crystal Defendants") motion to strike class allegations (Dkt. No. 59). Plaintiff McCall Law Firm, PLLC ("McCall") timely filed its response to the motion (Dkt. No. 64). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Crystal Defendants' motion. I.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 7, 2016 Session DAVID BRYAN HAWK v. CRYSTAL GOAN HAWK Appeal from the Chancery Court for Greene County No. 20120191 Hon. E.G. Moody, Chancellor1 No. E2015-01333-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 9, 2016 This post-divorce appeal concerns the mother’s petition to modify the res
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014-05-19 · Published · cited 7× · 23 F. Supp. 3d 938; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68136; 2014 WL 2077053
ORDER JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Golden Rule Ins. Co./United-Healthcare Corp.’s (“Golden Rule”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [.Filing No. JJ.]1 *941I. STANDARD OF REVIEW A motion f
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0× · 170 So. 3d 27; 2015 WL 1963751
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CRYSTAL SELLS, as Personal NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO Representative of THE ESTATE FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND OF LARRY SELLS, deceased, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D13-4775 v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed May 4, 2015.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 116 N.E.3d 525
Riley, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE [1] Appellants-Plaintiffs, Katrina Murray and Aquila F. Flynn, as Co-personal Representatives of the Estate of Jaylan T.R. Murray (collectively, Appellants), appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Appellees-Defendants, Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS) and Arlington Community High School (Arling
Mimms v. Brownpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003-09-03 · Published · cited 9× · 856 So. 2d 36; 2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 1681; 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2450; 2003 WL 22118995
^MICHAEL E. KIRBY, Judge. In this matter, Mr. Darius Mimms, Sr. appeals certain rulings of the trial court judgment of May 31, 2002 relating to issues of child custody and visitation. Mr. Mimms and Ms. Phaedra Brown are the parents of a minor son, Darius Mimms, Jr., who was born on March 8, 1995. Mr. Mimms and Ms. Brown were never married. The relevant procedural history of this case is as follows
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CT-01550-SCT STACIE MURRAY v. JAMES GRAY d/b/a GRAY TRUCKING AND KEVIN PARKER ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: S. MALCOLM HARRISON MICHAEL E. PHILLIPS
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000-07-07 · Published · cited 15× · 217 F.3d 59; 2000 WL 863033
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. On November 21, 1988, the Internal Revenue Service made an administrative determination, called an assessment, that Michael Murray owed $105,243.06 for failure to pay over withheld income and Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”) taxes due from his company, All Air Transportation Corp. 26 U.S.C. §§ 6201-OS (1994). As of that date, a statutory lien a
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-11-08 · Published · cited 19× · 184 So. 3d 1155
BENTON, J. The final judgment before us 1 was entered in cases consolidated below, in which *1158 the trial court ruled that. development rights within the Sandestin Development of Regional Impact (DRI) run with the land: The trial court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2003-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00673-CV Dena Campbell; Jeffrey Campbell; and Danny Green, Appellants v. Hays County, Texas; Allen G. Walther; and Clifford J. Conner, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 99-1139, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING ME
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2003-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00673-CV Dena Campbell; Jeffrey Campbell; and Danny Green, Appellants v.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Pa. Super. 116
J-S20020-22 2022 PA Super 116 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : JEFFREY DEAN MCFARLAND :
McLennan v. Joseypublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014-05-20 · Published · cited 4× · 234 N.C. App. 45; 758 S.E.2d 888; 2014 WL 2118434; 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 489
*46 ELMORE, Judge. Defendants appeal from order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration, we affirm. I. Facts Alex McLennan, Jr., Dorothy McLennan, and Rufus Carr, Jr., (collectively plaintiffs) and C.K. Josey, Jr., Deborah G.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2005-04-15 · Published · cited 2× · 365 F. Supp. 2d 677; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10732; 2005 WL 901919
365 F.Supp.2d 677 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Herbert E. KUBALAK; Troy Steven Messer; J. Randy Herron; Herron Land Surveying, PC, a/k/a Herron Surveying, PC; Amy R. Murray, in her official capacity as Register of Deeds for Haywood County, North Carolina; Norman Doyle Green, Jr.; Rickey Ogle and wife, Crystal D. Ogle; Thurman A. Evans, Jr., and wife, Brenda Evans; United Community Bank; and Gavin A. Brown, Trustee, Defendants.</
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 9, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1490 Lower Tribunal No. 22-1531 ________________ A.C., a juvenile, Appellant,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-09-28 · Published · cited 7× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 988; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70189; 2006 WL 2793174
449 F.Supp.2d 988 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco—Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-2496(GK). United State
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013-03-21 · Published · cited 1× · 931 F. Supp. 2d 373; 2013 WL 1164509; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39561
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. Plaintiff/counterclaim defendant National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, *375Inc. (“National Grange”), and defendants Judson Construction, Inc., Nathan Judson and Patrie Murray and defendant/counterclaim plaintiff The Estate of Crystal Slater have filed cro
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018-01-29 · Published · cited 2× · 306 F. Supp. 3d 970
Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Marshall County Board of Education's motion for summary judgment, [DN 21.] Plaintiff K.C., by and through his parents T.C. and K.C., responded to Defendant's motion, [DN 22], and Defendant replied, [DN 25.] Fully briefed, this matter is now ripe for consideration. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED