⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Cutler v. Robert Clark Flooring LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-01-06 · Published · cited 162× · 57 F.4th 131
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-3124 ____________ RHONDA H. WILSON; THE LAW OFFICES OF RHONDA HILL WILSON, P.C., Appellants v. USI INSURANCE SERVICE LLC; HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ____________ On Appeal from the
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 63× · 753 F.3d 1015; 60 Communications Reg. (P&F) 381; 2014 WL 2142106; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9637
BRISCOE, Chief Judge. In late 2011, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) issued a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Order) comprehensively reforming and modernizing its universal service and intercarrier compensation systems. Petitioners, each of whom were parties to the FCC’s rule-making proceeding below, filed petitions for judicial review of the FCC’s Order. The Judicial Pa
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-12-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOYCE M. STETTLER AND RAYMOND : No. 192 EAL 2014 J. STETTLER, H/W, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : v. : :
Ohio Court of Claims · 2011-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2011 Ohio 5323
[Cite as Parsons v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-5323.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215
G'SELL v. Carvenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-07-21 · Published · cited 7× · 724 F. Supp. 2d 101; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73134; 2010 WL 2853755
724 F.Supp.2d 101 (2010) Grant G'SELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael CARVEN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-2309 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 21, 2010. *105 Steven A. Cash, Harris, Cutler, Cash & Houghteling, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Robert Leon Wilkins, Damon W.
Poe v. Drummondpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018-06-29 · Published · cited 24× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 535
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Tyshanna Nuness ("Plaintiff"), filed this law suit against her previous employer, Simon & Schuster, Inc. ("Defendant"), wholly owned by CBS Corporation (collectively "Defendants"), as well as John Does 1-100 and ABC Corps 1-100, alleging racial harassment, constructive discharge, and retaliatory discharge under the New Jersey Law A
Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Association of America's Public Television Stations Public Broadcasting Service Corporation for Public Broadcasting National Association of Broadcasters Consumer Federation of America Office of Communication, United Church of Christ, Incorporated, Intervenors. Echostar Satellite Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Association of America's Public Television Stations Public Broadcasting Service Corporation for Public Broadcasting National Association of Broadcasters Consumer Federation of America Office of Communication, United Church of Christ, Incorporated, Intervenors. National Association of Broadcasters, Paxson Communications Corporation, Intervenor v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Association of America's Public Television Stations Public Broadcasting Service Corporation for Public Broadcasting Consumer Federation of America Office of Communication, United Church of Christ, Incorporated, Intervenors. Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association Echostar Communications Corporation Dish, Limited, D/B/A Dish Network Directv Enterprises, Incorporated Directv Operations, Incorporated Directv, Incorporated, and National Association of Broadcasters the Association of Local Television Stations, Incorporated the Univision Network Limited Partnership and Univision Television Stations, Incorporated, Intervenors/plaintiffs v. Federal Communications Commission William E. Kennard, Chairman Susan Ness, Commissioner, in Her Official Capacity Harold Furchtgottroth Michael K. Powell, Commissioner, in His Official Capacity Gloria Tristani, Commissioner, in Her Official Capacity United States Copyright Office Library of Congress James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress Mary Peters, Register of Copyrights, in Her Official Capacity United States of America, Association of America's Public Television Stations Public Broadcasting Service Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Intervenors Pegasus Communications Corporation Channel Master Llc, Parties in Interest. National Cable Satellite Corporation (C-Span) Space Systems/loral, Incorporated Paxson Communications Corporation Consumer Federation of America Office of Communication, United Church of Christ, Incorporated National Alliance for Media Arts & Culture Association of Independent Video and Filmmakers Virginia Citizens Consumer Council Conexant Systems, Incorporated Broadcom Corporation, Movantspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-01-31 · Published · cited 15× · 275 F.3d 337
275 F.3d 337 (4th Cir. 2001) SATELLITE BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents,ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA'S PUBLIC TELEVISION STATIONS; PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE; CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS; CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA; OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION, UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, INCORPORATED, Intervenors.E
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-05-23 · Published · cited 92× · 823 F.3d 759; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9366; 2016 WL 2956968
DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Appellants purchased financial instruments, mainly issued by the defendant banks, that carried a rate of return indexed to. the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which approximates the average rate at which a group of designated banks can borrow money. Appellees, 16 of the world’s largest banks (“the Banks”), were on the panel of banks that determined LIBOR each business day based, in par
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019-04-26 · Published · cited 80× · 440 P.3d 461
Biles, J., concurring: I concur in the result. I do so because the majority decision provides little guidance for applying strict scrutiny-very rarely used in Kansas-as a meaningful constitutional measure for this legislation. And what guidance it does provide confuses rather than clarifies. For all practical purposes, the majority leaves the trial court to fend for itself. In my view, an issue as troubling as this one requir
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-08-17 · Published · cited 9× · 79 F.4th 1009
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINDSAY HECOX; JANE DOE, with No. 20-35813 her next friends Jean Doe and John Doe, D.C. No. 1:20-cv- 00184-DCN Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BRADLEY LITTLE, in his official OPINION capacity as Governor of the State of Idaho; SHERRI YBARRA, in her official capacity as the Superint
California Court of Appeal · 2016-12-12 · Published · cited 9× · 6 Cal. App. 5th 686; 211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 490; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1078
Filed 12/12/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! et al., F069302 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. MCV062850) v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; VOTO No. 24-3188 LATINO; LIVING UNITED FOR D.C. No. CHANGE IN ARIZONA; LEAGUE 2:22-cv-00509- OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN SRB CITIZENS ARIZONA; ARIZONA STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION; ADRC ACTION; INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC.; OPINION SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE; ARIZONA COALITION FOR
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-31-2008 Kehm Oil Co v. Texaco Inc Precedential or Non-
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010-01-05 · Published · cited 3× · 985 A.2d 612; 190 Md. App. 11; 985 A.2d 622; 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 6
985 A.2d 612 (2010) 190 Md. App. 11 James RIFFIN v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY, et al. No. 2939, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. January 5, 2010. *613 James Riffin, Pro Se. Paul M. Mayhew, Adam M. Rosenblatt, John E. Beverungen, County Atty., on brief, for Appelle
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011-03-31 · Published · cited 28× · 786 F. Supp. 2d 887; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34839; 2011 WL 1260207
786 F.Supp.2d 887 (2011) Ryan McFADYEN, Matthew Wilson and Breck Archer, Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:07CV953. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 31, 2011. *898 Robert C. Ekstrand, Ekstrand & Ekstrand, LLP, Durham, NC, for Plaintiffs. Jamie S. Gorelick, Jennifer M. O'C
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010-12-10 · Published · cited 228× · 9 A.3d 882; 204 N.J. 320; 2010 N.J. LEXIS 1260; 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1803
Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-10-13 · Published · cited 160× · 804 F.3d 277; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17776; 2015 WL 5933354
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 14-1688 ________________ SYED FARHAJ HASSAN; THE COUNCIL OF IMAMS IN NEW JERSEY; MUSLIM STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF THE U.S. AND CANADA, INC.; ALL BODY SHOP INSIDE & OUTSIDE; UNITY BEEF SAUSAGE COMPANY; MUSLIM FOUNDATION INC.; MOIZ MOHAMMED; JANE DOE; SOOFIA TAHIR; ZA