Cases

Filed 12/19/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LAURA LAZAR, B321752 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV17351) v. LYNETTE BISHOP et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Cour

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered October 14, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the first through nineteenth and the twenty-fourth through twenty-eighth causes of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion as to the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventeenth causes of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

622 F.Supp. 1248 (1985) Seymour LAZAR On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. James D. SADLIER, et al., Defendants. Dr. Harold GELB, as Trustee of the Harold Gelb, DMB, PC, Pension Plan, and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. James D. SADLIER, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV 84-8100 WJR(Px), CV 84-8781 WJR(Px). United States District Court, C.D. Californi

346 S.W.3d 438 (2011) Robert LAZAR v. J.W. ALUMINUM. No. W2010-00659-SC-R3-WC. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. April 6, 2011 Session. July 26, 2011. *440 Blakely D. Matthews and J. Cole Dowsley, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, J.W. Aluminum. George L. Morrison III and Spencer Barnes,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, District Judge. This cause comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for remand to the California state court. For the reasons outlined below, plaintiff’s motion is denied, and this cause is consolidated with the other federal actions transferred to this district court for pre-trial management by the Multidistrict Litigation Panel on August 27, 1984.</

79 P.3d 105 (2003) Judy LAZAR, Plaintiff, v. Patrick RIGGS, Defendant. No. 03SA030. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. November 10, 2003. Mark A. Simon, Denver, Colorado, Attorney for Plaintiff. Levy, Morse & Wheeler, P.C., Marc R. Levy, Joshua R. Proctor, Englewood, Colorado, Attorneys for Defendant. *106 John

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA NIXOLA JEAN DOAN, Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Tristana ) Supreme Court Nos. S-17502

OPINION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STEVEN W. RHODES, Chief Judge. I. In this adversary proceeding, the plaintiff, Susan Swanner, seeks a judgment that a *382debt owing to her from the debtor, Thomas Lazar, is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4) and (6) and that Lazar should be denied a

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA NIXOLA JEAN DOAN, Personal ) ) Representative of the Estate of Supreme Court No.

237 F.3d 967 (9th Cir. 2001) In re: GARY LAZAR; DIVINE GRACE LAZAR; CALIFORNIA TARGET ENTERPRISES, INC.; ALAMEDA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.; LIBERTY MARKETING COMPANY, INC.; P & M SERVICE STATIONS, INC.; PRONTO MARKETING COMPANY, INC.; MISSION MARKETING GROUP, INC.; GOOD GUYS LUBE N' TUNE,INC.; CHALLENGE MARKETING CO., INC.; CALIFORNIA TARGET SUPPLY, INC. Debtor.GEORGE E. SCHULMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.STATE

83 F.Supp.2d 384 (2000) LAZAR'S AUTO SALES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Chrysler Financial Company L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. Charles Cartalemi and Joan Cartalemi, Defendants. Nos. 99 Civ. 213(CM), 99 Civ. 2484(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 1, 2000.

207 B.R. 668 (1997) In re Gary LAZAR and Divine Grace Lazar, Debtors. In re CALIFORNIA TARGET ENTERPRISES, INC. et al., Debtors. Bankruptcy No. LA 92-39039 SB, No. LA 92-39042. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. April 1, 1997. *669 *670 David Gould, McDermott, Will & Emery, Los A

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 368 (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 1494 Adam LAZAR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HERTZ CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. Nos. A080439, A080767. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. February 17, 1999. Review Denied April 28, 1999. *371 Milberg, Weiss, Bershad,

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: In these consolidated bankruptcy appeals, the California State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Board”) and the California Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (the “Fund”) challenge the district court’s orders denying them Eleventh Amendment immunity. In particular, the State Board contends that it is an arm of the state of California, that it did not waive its Eleventh Amendment immunity,

Opinion REARDON, J. Adam Lazar filed a class action complaint for damages and injunctive relief against four rental car companies alleging that they refused to rent automobiles to persons under age 25 or unreasonably restricted such rentals. After all of the alleged causes of action were adjudicated against Lazar, the trial court entered judgment in favor of defendants. In these consolidated appeals, Lazar a

GUNDRUM, J. ¶ 1. Plaintiffs-Respondents Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. (PPW) and Dr. *716Fredrik Broekhuizen sought and received from the circuit court a summary and declaratory judgment interpreting newly enacted Wis. Stat. § 253.10 (2013-14),1 related to voluntary consent for an abortion, and Wis. Stat. § 253.105, related to medicatio

Opinion WERDEGAR, J. We granted review in this matter to clarify, following our decisions in Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 654 [254 *635Cal.Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373] (Foley) and Hunter v. Up-Right, Inc. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1174 [26 Cal.Rptr.2d 8, 864 P.2d 88] (Hunter), whether or unde

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. *952TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.■.. © CR to BACKGROUND FACTS. CO to © I. The Lawsuit. CO to © II. Act 37. tO to 05 A. Overview of Key Provisions. t© uo 05 B. Legislative History. l© to 05

192 B.R. 161 (1995) NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, Appellant, v. Marten H. LAZAR, Appellee. No. 95-2521-TUV. Bankruptcy No. 94-26615-DSK. Adv.Proc. No. 94-1039. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. December 11, 1995. *162 Steven N. Douglass, Memphis, TN. Norman P. Hagemeyer, Memphis, TN.

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. In this action, plaintiffs Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc.; Susan Pfleger, M.D., a Planned Parenthood physician; Kathy King, M.D., Planned Parenthood’s Medical Director; and Milwaukee Women’s Medical Services d/b/a Affiliated Medical Services assert various constitutional challenges to Section 1 of 2013 Wisconsin Act 37 (“the Act”) against defendan