Cases

ACCEPTED 06-14-00150-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/6/2015 1:31:33 PM

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 11, 2024 Decided June 21, 2024 No. 23-5122 IOWASKA CHURCH OF HEALING, APPELLANT v. DANIEL I. WERFEL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States D

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 11, 2024 Decided June 21, 2024 No. 23-5122 IOWASKA CHURCH OF HEALING, APPELLANT v. DANIEL I. WERFEL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States D

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Waid v. State, Fla. 1952, 58 So.2d 146, and Testasecca v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 115 So.2d 584. CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Derrick Hardin managed a long-running cocaine distribution operation in Evansville, Indiana. Dissatisfied with the price his principal suppliers wanted for wholesale quantities, Hardin turned to his friend George Tyson, then living in California. Tyson came up with some cocaine and introduced Hardin to Enrique Rivera, who became Hardin’s new princip

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Defendant John Brett Allen was charged in a thirteen count indictment with two violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 *1182(RICO), one count of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848 (CCE), several substantive drug and money laundering offenses, and two

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. James Earl Polk Jr. was convicted in the Circuit Court of Marion County of murder and sentenced to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections and fined $5,000. Polk now appeals, asserting: (1) his right to confrontation was violated when the trial court admitted statements made by his cousin and codefendant, Howard Earl Polk Jr. (Howard), through the test

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6109 Doc: 70 Filed: 12/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-6109 RAYMOND TATE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. J. HARMON, Regional Director; M. BR

OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The sole issue that we address in this appeal is whether the defense of estoppel is available in a suit to enforce unpaid child support brought by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in its capacity as an assignee. Because we hold that estoppel is available as a defense in an enforcem

352 S.W.3d 48 (2011) In the Interest of C.E.S., Minor Child. No. 02-10-00159-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. June 2, 2011. Rehearing Overruled August 25, 2011. *49 Ron Overman, Earl R. Waddell, III, Conroe, for Appellant. Greg Abbott, Atty. Gen., of Texas, Daniel Hodge, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alicia G.

785 P.2d 153 (1989) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl William CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87CA1955. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. November 30, 1989. *154 Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., and John Milton Hutchins, Asst. Att

ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Mackle Vincent Shelton’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. (Dkt. 28) On May 13, 2002, th

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment of the District Court of Reeves County in appellee's favor, said verdict having been peremptorily directed upon conclusion of the evidence offered by all parties, and the action of the trial court in so directing a verdict and in so rendering judgment for appellees is attacked in various forms by the assignments of error herein. The plaintiff below in substance alleged that it was duly incorporated; that on July 23, 1893, it was the owner i

37 F.Supp.2d 778 (1999) Johnny and Tamara HAGER, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC., a corporation, and American General Home Equity, Inc., a corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:97-0381. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. January 7, 1999. *779 *780 Daniel F. H

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAGGIE SMITH et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Case No. 15-737 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION To stem the tide of violent crime, the District of Columbia has spent decades enacting some of the strictest gun control measures in the country. But despite these laudable ends, the District’s means have precipitated repeated tugs-of-war against law-abiding citizens, with the federal courts as the referee and the Sec

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The Dallas Independent School District (DISD), the eighth largest urban school district in the country, has been the subject of desegregation litigation for over twenty years.1 In 1975, a panel of this court remanded the case to the district court with instructions that a plan be implemented that would effectively desegregate the school system. Tasby v. Estes

461 S.E.2d 631 (1995) 341 N.C. 513 STATE of North Carolina, v. George Earl GOODE, Jr. No. 10A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 8, 1995. *635 Michael F. Easley, Attorney General by Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. J. Clark Fischer, Winston-Salem, for defen

24 F.3d 1180 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John Brett ALLEN, also known as Lucky Pierre, also known asJohn Andrew Davis, also known as John ThomasDavis, also known as David EarlPeterson, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-1225. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. May 5, 1994. Ja

201 F.Supp.2d 700 (2002) ADAMS, Harry, Agney, Robert N., Aker, Brenda A., Aker, John R., Akers, Allen, Akers, Geneva, Albert, Jane, Albert, Larry K., Albert, Ryoks B., Alderman, Mitchell, Alexander, Claborne, Alger, Gloria, Alley, Randsom D., Allison, Harold, Altizer, Clinton, Amos, Sparrell, Anders, Richard, Andrews, Gene F., Austin, John, Bane, Lewis, Beasley, Ellen M., Bell, Benjamin H., Bell, William A., Bishop, Billy M., Blake, Robert C., Boland, Fe