⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “DANNY C. GREEN”

State v. Greenpublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997-01-31 · Published · cited 61× · 947 S.W.2d 186; 1997 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 98
947 S.W.2d 186 (1997) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Danny C. GREEN, Appellant. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. January 31, 1997. *187 Philip A. Condra, Public Defender, Jasper, for Appellant. Charles W. Burson, Attorney General and Reporter, Karen M. Yacuzzo, Asst. Attorney General, Nashville, J. Michael Taylor, Di
Roth v. Greenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006-10-30 · Published · cited 121× · 466 F.3d 1179; 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 611; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26923; 2006 WL 3059921
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. These appeals challenge a sanction award against counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, as well as a fee award against two individual plaintiffs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Both appeals arise out of the same ill-fated § 1983 action. Plaintiffs Stephen Roth and Ellen Gumeson, represented by a
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 914 So. 2d 705; 2005 Miss. LEXIS 722; 2005 WL 2878091
DICKINSON, Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. The material facts necessary for a determination of this appeal are not in dispute. R.R.H. Holdings, Inc. and J.M. Tomlinson Holdings, Inc. organized Southern Landfill Management, Inc. (“SLM”) for the purpose of acquiring real property on which to construct, own and operate a sanitary landfill in Jefferson County. In 1993, SLM purchased approximately two-thirds undivid
Danny Hillpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-08-25 · Published · cited 30× · 81 F.4th 560
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0196p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: DANNY HILL, │
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2009-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-09-00323-CV </
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
05/11/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 12, 2017 Session KIM L. HIGGS V. JOHN C. GREEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 12C5340 Kelvin D. Jones, Judge No. M2016-01369-COA-R3-CV This a
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996-09-24 · Published · cited 0×
The undersigned have reviewed both Opinions and Awards filed by Deputy Commissioner Jan Pittman. The Full Commission AFFIRMS the Deputy Commission Opinion and Award in I.C. 371224 filed on September 22, 1995. However, in I.C. 163788 filed on November 2, 1992, the appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission reverses the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award in I.C. 163788 and enters the following Opinion and Award. * * * * * * * * * * *
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2025-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2025 Term FILED _____________ March 21, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009-08-14 · Published · cited 2× · 213 P.3d 764; 42 Kan. App. 2d 441; 2009 Kan. App. LEXIS 813
213 P.3d 764 (2009) Danny DOUGLAS, Appellee, v. AD ASTRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, L.L.C., and Hartford Insurance Company, Appellants. No. 101,445. Court of Appeals of Kansas. August 14, 2009. *766 Tracy M. Vetter, of Law Offices of Steve Piland, of Overland Park, for appellants. Daniel L. Smith, of Ankerholz and Smith, of Over
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001-01-22 · Published · cited 87× · 542 S.E.2d 360; 343 S.C. 531; 2001 S.C. LEXIS 16
343 S.C. 531 (2001) 542 S.E.2d 360 Anthony L. MUNOZ and Patricia A. Munoz, Petitioners, v. GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORP. a/k/a Green Tree Acceptance Corp. and Gerald Sealey d/b/a Tri-State Builders, Defendants, of whom Green Tree Financial Corp. is Respondent. No. 25238. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard April 6, 2000. Decided January
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
12/02/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 23, 2019 DANNY SANTARONE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. C66904 James F. Goodwin, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
People v. Greenpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-06-09 · Published · cited 13× · 195 A.D.3d 754; 145 N.Y.S.3d 407; 2021 NY Slip Op 03620
People v Green (2021 NY Slip Op 03620) People v Green 2021 NY Slip Op 03620 Decided on June 9, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
07/29/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 25, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANNY D. KEEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County No. 16-CR-429 Brody N. Kane, Judge ___________________________________
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2021-04-22 · Published · cited 2× · 2021 Ark. 89
Cite as 2021 Ark. 89 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-11-613 Opinion Delivered: April 22, 2021 DANNY LEE ASHLEY PRO SE PETITION TO REINVEST PETITIONER JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL V. COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-09-11 · Published · cited 173× · 937 F.3d 1171
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2181 ___________________________ Charles Hamner, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Danny Burls, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC; Connie Jenkins, Classification Supervisor/Off
Green v. Tuckerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 2012-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 101 So. 3d 358; 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 618; 2012 WL 4667238; 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1926
PER CURIAM. Danny A. Green, an inmate in state custody, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus with this Court alleging that his sentences are illegal.1 We denied the petition in this case by way of an unpublished order,2 determining that the petition was procedurally barred.3 In disposing of the petition in this case, we expres
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-05-31 · Published · cited 9× · 824 F.3d 735; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9784; 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,570; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 229; 2016 WL 3064567
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Jerry Henry, a former employee of the Arkansas Department of Corrections (“ADC”), brought this action against Warden Danny Burl, Deputy Warden Dexter Payne, and Major Jeremy Andrews in their individual capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Henry, an African-American, alleges that his employment was terminated wrongfully on the basis of his race in violation o
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-4556 Doc: 38 Filed: 08/14/2026 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4556 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DANNY T. RONEY, a/k/a Khalid Abdul Al-Mu’Min, a/k/a Danny Roney,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued February 28, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00158-CV ——————————— MARK ALAN SWANSON, Appellant V. ROBERT DANNY CLACK, II, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-05-26 · Published · cited 135× · 824 F.3d 476; 32 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1405; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9683
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Danny Delaval filed this lawsuit against PTech Drilling Tubulars, LLC, claiming the company violated the Americans with Disabilities Act in terminating his employment. The district court granted summary judgment in PTech’s favor. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND PTech Drilling Tubulars,