Cases

MEMORANDUM ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default as to Defendants Municipality of Aguas Bue-nas, Mayor Luis Arroyo Chiques, and Nelson J. Ortiz Reyes is hereby GRANTED. (Docket No. 12.) Said Defendants were served with process on January 21 and 22, 2014. (See Docket 9.) The deadline to answer and/or otherwise plead contained in Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(A)(i) &

747 F.Supp.2d 280 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cruz Roberto RAMOS-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 07-318 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 8, 2010. *283 Fernando J. Carlo-Gorbea, Fernando J. Carlo Law Office, Anita Hill-Adames, Anita Hill Law Office, Robert Millan, Millan Law

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL RAÚL ORTIZ LEANDRY; Apelación ROL RECYCLING, INC. Procedente del Tribunal de DEMANDANTES Primera Instancia, Sala

NUMBER 13-12-00131-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DAVID RODRIGUEZ ORTIZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

545 Pa. 279 (1996) 681 A.2d 152 Councilman Angel ORTIZ and Councilman David Cohen and Councilwoman Jannie L. Blackwell and Al Stewart, Ward Leader of 11th Ward and Candidate for City Council for the 8th District and Gregory Beau Paulmier, Ward Leader of the 12th Ward and Philadelphia Anti-Drug/Anti-Violence Network (PANN) and Consumer Education and Protective Association (CEPA) and Fathers Day Rally Committee and Thomas P. Cronin,

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI APELACIÓN procedente del Tribunal BRENDA LEE MIRANDA de Primera Instancia MALDONADO Sala de Aibonito APELADOS Caso Núm. KLAN202301130 AI2021CV00474 V.

McGINLEY, Judge. Presently before this Court are the preliminary objections of Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the petition for declaratory and injunctive relief filed in our original jurisdiction by elected members of the Philadelphia City Council, elected ward leaders, citizens, residents, taxpayers and representative organizations of, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Petitioners).

Ramos v 110 Bennett Ave., LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 01251) Ramos v 110 Bennett Ave., LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 01251 Decided on February 20, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Breslin, J.), rendered August 29, 2012 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. In December 2011, defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by the police for a traffic infraction. During a search of t

THE HONORABLE DAVID BRIONES, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendant Antonio Cruz-Ramos's ("Mr. Cruz-Ramos") "Motion to Dismiss Indictment" ("Motion"), filed in the above-captioned case on June 7, 2019. On June 12, 2019, the United States of America ("the Government") filed its "Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment" ("Response"). After due consideration, the C

Arnold-Burger, C.J.: *256 *306 Kansas law provides that an appeal may be taken from any judgment in a municipal court that adjudges the defendant guilty of a violation of a city ordinance. K.S.A.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 24, 2023 Decided July 25, 2023 Reissued August 10, 2023 No. 21-5097 LAURA J. RAMOS, APPELLANT v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE Appeal from the United

JUDGMENT CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by petitioner Jose L. Claudio-Ortiz (D.E. 1), the United States’ Response in Opposition (D.E. 5), and the Report and Recommendation issued by U.S. Magistrate-Judge Justo Arenas (D.E. 6), to which no objections have been filed, said Report and Recommendation is

MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. Nicolas Ramos-Ramirez (“Defendant”) is charged with one count of unauthorized reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).1 Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment. (ECF No. 14.) The issues have been briefed (ECF Nos. 14, 20, and 21), and no hearing is required because no facts are i

629 F.3d 60 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Edgar RAMOS, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-2251. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 2, 2010. Decided December 17, 2010. *61 Tamara Fisher, with whom Catherine K. Byrne, Assistant Federal Public Defender, was on brief, for appellan

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-2119 19-2129 ROBERTO RAMOS PEREA, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross Appellant, BEATRIZ LAGUERRE SAAVEDRA; BEATRIZ ALEXIA ALVAREZ LAGUERRE; RAFAEL ENRIQUE ALVAREZ LAGUERRE; GABRIEL ORTIZ LAGUERRE; FABIAN ANTONIO CHARRON ALVAREZ; CARLA VICTORIA CHARRON ALVAREZ, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v.

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Miguel Pacheco Ortiz (“Pacheco”) sued Gaspar Sanchez Saez (“Sanchez”) and another unnamed Puerto Rico Police Department officer, in their individual capacities, alleging that they deprived him of constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), engaged in a civil rights conspiracy in violation of 42 U.S.C

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 14-1692 14-1870 14-1919 14-2098 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MANUEL DE JESÚS ROSARIO-PÉREZ; JORGE GÓMEZ-GONZÁLEZ, a/k/a Jorge Cara de Truck; BRYANT SETIAWAN-RAMOS, a/k/a Chino; and SANTIAGO HERNÁNDEZ-ROSA, a/k/a Chago Coyote, Defendants, Appellants.