⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “DAVILA v. 3M COMPANY”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-05-29 · Published · cited 9× · 487 F.3d 660; 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2421; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12348; 2007 WL 1531236
LOKEN, Chief Judge. Kenny Werdehausen had neck surgery and submitted a benefits claim under his employer’s group health plan reflected in an insurance policy issued by Benicorp Insurance Company. In reviewing the claim, Benicorp discovered that Werdehau-sen had failed to disclose the need for neck surgery in his policy enrollment application. Benicorp determined that this was a ma
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-03-13 · Published · cited 2× · 241 F. Supp. 3d 599; 2017 WL 976623; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35812
OPINION John A. Gibney, Jr. United States District Judge As the popularity of the internet has soared since the late 1990s, problems with data congestion have arisen over the lanes of the information superhighway. In' order to keep up with ever-growing demand for digital content delivered over the internet, inventors constantly develop and patent new technology to move high volumes of data, at high speeds
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2004-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2004 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2004. In The
District Court, Virgin Islands · 1998-06-09 · Published · cited 3× · 39 V.I. 235; 180 F.R.D. 284; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8716
MEMORANDUM MOORE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Peter Anderson's ["Anderson"] motion to reconsider this Court's Order of November 21,1997, and on defendant Ramon Davila's ["Davila"] motions to quash several of plaintiff's subpoenas and for sanctions. For the reasons expressed herein, the Court will deny Anderson's motion to reconsider and will grant Davila's motions to
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2818 ___________ Kenny J. Werdehausen; Anita * Werdehausen, * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014-11-21 · Published · cited 2× · 62 F. Supp. 3d 879; 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1433; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163627; 2014 WL 6633083
ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. This is a private civil enforcement action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The case was filed as a putative class action by participants in U.S. Bancorp’s pension plan (hereinafter, “the Plan”). In their Consolidated Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs allege that the Plan’s fiduciaries breached their fiduciary obligations and caus