⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “DAVIS v. STEPANIK”

Davis v. Rawsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 35 F. App'x 185
PER CURIAM. Defendant Robert G. Rawson, a former Washington County (Ohio) juvenile court judge, appeals from the district court’s denial of his request for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity. Rawson contends that, at the time he removed the plaintiff, Richard Davis, from the position of assistant superintendent of a juvenile facility, the principle of law was not clearly established that such an employment decisio
State v. Morabithpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-09-12 · Published · cited 3× · 2022 Ohio 3177
[Cite as State v. Morabith, 2022-Ohio-3177.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 21CA011778 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE KYLE MORABITH
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 Ohio 2397
[Cite as Olmsted Falls v. Clifford, 2014-Ohio-2397.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100375 CITY OF OLMSTED FALLS PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
Lumaj v. Ashcroftpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-12-16 · Published · cited 0× · 115 F. App'x 595
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. Petitioner Nike Lumaj seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming without opinion the decision of the Immigration Judge to deny his application for political asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction to review the Board’s order under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We will affirm. I. Background Nike
In re Schunkpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988-01-29 · Published · cited 5× · 136 A.D.2d 904; 524 N.Y.S.2d 925; 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1339
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: This appeal and cross appeal are from an order that appointed Jeanette Vargo coconservator and denied Var-go’s motion for removal of Edward Schunk, the current conservator. The conservatee is Charlotte Stepanik, Vargo’s sister. After entry of the order appealed from, Vargo moved for reargument of, or to vacate,
Holloway v. Hornpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001-08-27 · Published · cited 15× · 161 F. Supp. 2d 452; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13463; 2001 WL 1006710
161 F.Supp.2d 452 (2001) Arnold HOLLOWAY, Petitioner, v. Martin HORN, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, and Donald Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Respondents. No. CIV.A. 00-CV-1757. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 27, 2001. *453