Cases

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. *165TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................166 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................168 A. THE PARTIES......................................................1

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this employment action, pro se Plaintiff, William Henry Kennedy (hereinafter, “Plaintiff’), generally alleges that Defendants Envoy Airlines, Inc.1 (hereinafter, “Envoy”), American Airlines, Inc. (hereinafter, “American Airlines” and collectively, “Defendants”), and John Doe 1-10 unlawfully terminated his employment af

717 F.2d 1008 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2788, 98 Lab.Cas. P 10,471 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO-CLC; UnitedSteelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 1123;Albert A. DeAngelis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The TIMKEN COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 82-3213. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued May 4, 1983.

12 N.J. Super. 147 (1951) 79 A.2d 88 FLOYD BARNHART AND LAWRENCE DeANGELIS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIR-CRAFT, AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW-CIO) INTERNATIONAL UNION AND AMALGAMATED LOCAL 669, CIO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 5, 1951. Decided March 1, 1951

932 F.Supp. 1328 (1996) The EKOTEK SITE PRP COMMITTEE, an unincorporated association, Plaintiff, v. Steven M. SELF, et al., Defendants. Nos. 94-277L, 95-0154L. United States District Court, D. Utah. March 6, 1996. *1329 *1330 Robert M. Pomeroy, Jr., Paul D. Phillips, Steven W. Black, Denise W.

Opinion JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. This matter arises under the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law (“NJWHL”), N.J.S.A. § 34:11-56a et seq. Defendant Bally’s Park Place (“Bally’s”) owns and operates Defendant Bally’s Casino and Hotel in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Patrick DeAngelis (“Plaintiff’) is a former Dealer in the Table Games Department at Bally’s.2

932 F.Supp. 1319 (1996) The EKOTEK SITE PRP COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. Steven M. SELF, et al., Defendants. No. 94-27. United States District Court, D. Utah. June 11, 1996. *1320 Robert M. Pomeroy, Jr., Paul D. Phillips, Steven W. Black, Denise W. Kennedy, Holland & Hart, Denver, CO, Lawrence J. Jensen, Holland & Hart, Salt

609 F.Supp.2d 386 (2009) Ronald LEDER, et al. v. Jerome SHINFELD, et al. Civil Action No. 06-1805. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 14, 2009. *389 Alan L. Frank, Alan L. Frank Law Associates PC, Elkins Park, PA, for Ronald Leder, James Boyle, Boyleder, LP Independence Motors, Inc. and Metro Motorcars, Inc.</

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Alex Ingrassia, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1212 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: June 26, 2015 Workers’ Compensation Appeal : Board (Universal Health Services, : Inc.), : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE BERNARD L.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1523-19 DEBORAH MARINO, Executrix for the Estate of ANITA CREUTZBERGER and Individual Heirs of the Estate of ANITA CREUTZBERGER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION

BRADFORD, Judge. Case Summary1 [1] Appellants/Plaintiffs Seema Kap-oor; Shiv Kapoor; Performance Support Consulting; LLC (collectively, “the Kap-oor Plaintiffs”); Matt Judson; and Regional Construction Services, Inc. (collectively, “the Judson Plaintiffs”), appeal from, the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss in favor of Appellees/Defendants Steve Dyb-wad; Cronin Insura

ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/20/2025 4:28 PM

AMBRO, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority opinion describes these cases as situations calling for preemption: the expert agency, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), consults scientific data to generate the optimal warnings (not too lax, not too alarmist) for drug labels— and state tort lawsuits would disrupt this fine system. But there is an important contrary view that has prevailed until recently: s

DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff, Ads Plus Advertising, Inc. (“Ads Plus”), has sued defendants Alan Ault, Robert Ault and Professional Auto Retailers, Inc. (“PAR”) (collectively, “defendants”) for breach of contract and unjust enrichment arising out of defendants’ alleged failure to compensate A

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARTER PAGE, § § No. 79, 2021 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S20C-07-030 OATH INC., § § D

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

17 F.Supp.2d 255 (1998) Martin SCHECHTER, et ano., Plaintiffs, v. TAUCK TOURS, INC., Defendant. TAUCK TOURS, INC., Third-party Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Third-party Defendant. No. 98 CIV. 4367 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 24, 1998. *256 *257

AMY J. ST. EVE United States District Judge *699On July 25, 2017, Plaintiff Mission Measurement Corporation ("Mission Measurement") brought the present twelve-count Second Amended Complaint against Defendants Blackbaud, Inc. ("Blackbaud"), MicroEdge, LLC ("MicroEdge"), Vista Equity Partners Management, LLC ("Vista Management"), VFF I AIV I, L.P. ("Vista I Fund"), VFF I

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment in part: In all candor, I share with my colleagues the personal preference that all people treat each other with respect and decency, in and out of the workplace. My disagreement with the result reached by the majority should in no way be interpreted as condoning the deplorable behavior exhibited by the e