Cases

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1193THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Santos Gonzales' Motion for Production of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements, Pre-Trial Hearing on Their Admissibility Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), filed May 9, 2017 (Doc. 1141)("Gonzales Motion"); (ii) Defenda

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered June 5, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s contention t

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. The central issue in this criminal appeal is whether 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) makes a prior conviction for an aggravated felony an element of the offense, requiring proof for conviction, or whether it is a penalty enhancement provision under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), which sets forth the elements of the offense.

2024 IL 129133 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 129133) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. MICHEAL D. CHATMAN, Appellant. Opinion filed January 19, 2024.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge. Presently before this court is Defendants’ Renewed Partial Motion to Dismiss, asserting defenses for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 18.) Defendants indicate that they seek dismissal of all claims against all Defendants, except for “

Case: 20-40428 Document: 00516002643 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 3, 2021 No.

USCA11 Case: 19-10014 Date Filed: 03/24/2021 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10014 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cv-02419-CEH-AEP ERIN TONKYRO, DANA STRAUSER, KARA MITCHEL

Office of the Director New Mexico 08:13:29 2022.02.15 Compilation '00'07- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2022-NMSC-006 Filing Date: November 15, 2021 No. S-1-SC-37489 AMADO CHAVEZ, RAMONA HERNANDEZ, TODD LOPEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of EDGAR CHAVE

Appellate Case: 22-2034 Document: 010111001759 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 16, 2024

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Bruce Scott Ziskind was indicted in 2002 of one count of conspiracy to steal goods traveling in interstate commerce and two counts of receiving stolen interstate shipments of goods. 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 659 (receipt of stolen goods). A jury convicted Ziskind on all counts of the indictment, and he was sentenced to 63 months of imprisonme

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: In 2011, Texas (“the State”) passed Senate Bill 14 (“SB 14”), which requires individuals to present one of several forms of photo identification in order to vote. See Act of May 16, 2011, 82d Leg., R.S., ch. 123, 2011 Tex. Gen. Laws 619. Plaintiffs filed suit challenging the constitutionality and legality of the law. The district court held that SB 14 was enacted with a racially discriminatory

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; VOTO No. 24-3188 LATINO; LIVING UNITED FOR D.C. No. CHANGE IN ARIZONA; LEAGUE 2:22-cv-00509- OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN SRB CITIZENS ARIZONA; ARIZONA STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION; ADRC ACTION; INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC.; OPINION SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE; ARIZONA COALITION FOR

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Artemus E. Ward, Jr. (“Ward”) appeals his conviction after jury trial and his ensuing sixty-month prison sentence for mail and wire fraud. The charges arose out of Ward’s involvement in a complex, fraudulent Ponzi scheme, 1 whereby millions of dollars in investor funds were obtained by making fa

WATERMAN, Justice. In this appeal, we must decide whether to abandon the automobile exception to the search warrant requirement under article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution. In State v. Gaskins, we did not reach that issue, but members of this court noted the rationale for the exception may be eroded by technological advances enabling police to obtain warrants from the scene of a traffic stop. 866 N.W.2d 1, 1

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge. These consolidated cases address the voting rights claims of Plaintiffs and Inter-veners (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs” unless otherwise noted)1 against the State of Texas, Rick Perry in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas (Perry), John Steen in his official capacity as

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0974 Filed December 3, 2025 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ASA JAMES STARR, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Zachary Hindman, Judge. A defendant appeals his convictions following a jury trial. AFFIRMED.

HAYNES, Circuit Judge, joined by STEWART, Chief Judge, and DAVIS, PRADO, SOUTHWICK, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges, in full; DENNIS and COSTA, Circuit Judges, joining in all but Part II.A.1 and *225concurring in the judgment.1 In 2011, Texas (“the State”) passed Senate Bill 14 (“SB 14”), which requires individuals to pre

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. TATEL, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Ahmed Belbacha, Abu Dhiab, and Shaker Aamer are detainees who, although cleared for release, remain held at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Protesting their continued confinement, they and other similarly s

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00219-CR Manuel Caudillo Ramirez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-04-393, HONORABLE RONALD G. CARR, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION