Cases

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s motion to dismiss claims of patent infringement in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). [Docket Item 15.] Defendant argues that Plaintiffs’ allegations are so overbroad they do not state a plausible claim of direct or i

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“IV”) filed suit against Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”) on March 20, 2013 alleging that various Toshiba products (collecti

MEMORANDUM DuBOIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs and counterclaim-defendants, Comcast Communications, LLC and related corporate entities (collectively “Com-cast”), brought this action against defendants and counterclaim-plaintiffs, Sprint *594Communications Co., LP and related corporate entities (collecti

441 B.R. 791 (2010) MC ASSET RECOVERY, LLC v. COMMERZBANK AG, et al. Action No. 4:06-CV-013-Y. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. December 22, 2010. *795 J. Robert Forshey, Jeff P. Prostok, Suzanne K. Rosen, Forshey & Prostok LLP, Fort Worth, TX, for MC Asset Recovery, LLC. J. Mark Chevallie

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. This lawsuit is about the search of the plaintiffs home pursuant to a warrant. One of the defendants, Officer Corona, procured the warrant based on a tip from an informant that marijuana was being sold out of the home and that a large quantity of it would be found there. The search yielded no marijuana, but Officer Corona did come

MILLER, Presiding Judge. This case involves a tragic fire at the home of appellant Debbie Cash, which resulted in the death of Cash’s husband and son. Cash and her surviving daughter filed suit against LG Electronics, Inc. 1 alleging, among other claims, strict liability and negligence. Cash claims that the LG televisio

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0084p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ANDREA PERRY, individually and on behalf of all other ┐ Ohio residents similarly situated, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

OPINION AND ORDER HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court are four motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56(c): (1) defendant Fluke Corporation’s (“Fluke”) motion for summary judgment on its counterclaim for injunctive relief and damages for false advertising under Section 43(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (“Lanham Act”), 60 Stat. 441, as ame

USCA11 Case: 22-10633 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 07/10/2023 Page: 1 of 55 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10633 ____________________ NORMAN MACPHEE, Individuall

Case: 19-2301 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 04/24/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY, Appellant ______________________ 2019-2301 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 07/425,360. _____

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2852 VIAMEDIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. __________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2852 VIAMEDIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. __________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2852 VIAMEDIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. __________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2852 VIAMEDIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. __________

ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court are the following four motions: (1) Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd’s (“TG”) Renewed Motion to Vacate the Default Judgment and Dismiss the Complaint in Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Case No. 09-6687 (R. Doc. 13490); (2) TG’s Renewed Motion Pursuant to Rules 55(c) and 12(b)(2) to Vacate the Entry of Default and Dismiss T

REDACTED OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...............................................................209 FINDINGS OF FACT...........................................................211 I.ASCAP and Its Two Competitors..........................................211 II.The Cable

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. *374CONTENTS TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................375 PART 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................376 I.The Record and Relevant Proceedings ..................

712 F.Supp.2d 206 (2010) In re APPLICATION OF MOBITV, INC. Related to United States of America, Plaintiff, v. American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers, Defendant. Nos. 09 Civ. 7071 (DLC), 41 Civ. 1395 (DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 11, 2010. *208 Kenneth L. Steinthal, Joseph R. Wetzel, H