Cases

Mario Pittoni, J. This proceeding is brought against the Comptroller of the State of New York for an order compelling the return of money paid over to him as abandoned property by the Treasurer of Nassau County. On December 13, 1959, $460 was deposited in the office of the Nassau County Treasurer to the credit of Elizabeth Jane Cox, an infant, pursuant to an order of the Nassau County Court approving the compr

DECISION AND ORDER Brett H. Ludwig, United States Bankruptcy Judge *652Alan and Maureen Bagg are Chapter 7 debtors. On August 18, 2017, one of their longtime neighbors, Robert Heinrich, filed a proof of claim and an adversary complaint in their bankruptcy case. Heinrich's $425,324.05 claim is based on a state court judgment that he obtained against the B

134 Cal.App.2d 628 (1955) DOROTHY GUILLORY et al., Respondents, v. MILDRED GODFREY et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 20725. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. July 28, 1955. Cletus J. Hanifin for Appellants. Lawrence J. Yanover for Respondents. ASHBURN, J. pro tem. [fn. *] In this action for recovery of damages

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination action is what the court construes as a motion for reconsideration filed by Plaintiff Nana-Akua Takyiwaa Shalom (ECF No. 45) and a partial motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Payless Shoesource Worldwide, Inc., Richard DeMicco, and Ronald Ebelein (ECF No. 43).

POSNER, Circuit Judge. A common law principle that so far as we know is in force in every state of the United States forbids a person to own an insurance policy that insures someone *656else’s life unless the policy owner has an insurable interest in that life. Ohio National Life Assurance Corp. v. Davis, 803 F.3d 904, 907-08 (7th Cir. 2015). So you are allow

OPINION Ken Wise, Justice In this accelerated, interlocutory appeal, the appellant contends that the trial court’s purported oral grant of motions to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) was ineffective and therefore the motions were denied by operation of law. Under the TCPA, the trial court must rule on a motion to dismiss no later than the 30th day following the date of the hearing on

Decree of Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk County on the final accounting of the executrices, insofar as it is the subject of appeal by Lydia E. Godfrey and Bertha A. Godfrey, as individuals, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ.

202 Wis.2d 600 (1996) 550 N.W.2d 144 Dorothy GOFF, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Appellant,[†] v. Joy SELDERA, M.D., Defendant-Appellant-Cross Respondent,[†] WISCONSIN PATIENTS COMPENSATION FUND, Cross Respondent. Dorothy GOFF, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joy SELDERA, M.D., Defendant-Appellant, WISCONSIN PATIENTS COMPENSATION FUND, Co-Appellant. Nos. 95-0135, 95-101

243 F.Supp. 830 (1965) UNITED STATES of America v. Larry C. GODFREY. Crim. No. 357-63. United States District Court District of Columbia. July 16, 1965. *831 William H. Collins, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiff. William J. Garber, Washington, D. C., for defendant. YOUNGDAHL, District Judge. On January 7,

CARDINE, Justice, dissenting. I dissent from the majority opinion for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion filed in State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Paulson, Wyo., 756 P.2d 764 (1988).

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

114 N.H. 651 (1974) WALTER A. CALDERWOOD v. DOROTHY A. CALDERWOOD. No. 6251a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. October 31, 1974. Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey & Soden and Martin L. Gross (Mr. Gross orally) for Walter A. Calderwood. Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch and James E. Townsend and Richard E. Galway, Jr. (Mr. Galway</

ACCEPTED 14-14-00825-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/4/2015 2:29:02 PM

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Respondent, Daniel Siegel was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Second Judicial Department on December 21, 1950. At all times relevant herein respondent has maintained and office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department. Respondent was charged with 16 violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Respo

435 A.2d 1087 (1981) ESTATE OF John F. TURF[1]. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued November 14, 1980. Decided October 16, 1981. *1088 Harry N. Starbranch (orally), Augusta, for appellant Dorothy E. Tranum. Clayton N. Howard, Damariscotta, for plaintiff. Roger A. Putnam (orally), Verrill & Dana, Portland,

W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE Before the Court are cross Motions for Judgment on the Record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52, filed by Plaintiff and Defendant on June 29, 2018. (Docs. 14 & 15.) Upon review of the administrative record, the arguments of counsel, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. 14) and DENIES Defendant's Motion

POLSTON, J. We review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass’n v. Petty, 44 So.3d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), which certified conflict with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass’n v. Soto, 979 So.2d 964 *315(Fla. 3d DCA 2008).1 Beca

423 A.2d 548 (1980) Dorothy A. HAMM v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued November 6, 1980. Decided December 23, 1980. *549 Twitchell, Gray, Linscott & Badger by Richard M. Maraghy (orally), Steven G. Shadallah, Frederick Badger, Jr., Bangor, for plaintiff. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson

155 Wis.2d 504 (1990) 455 N.W.2d 885 Clarence ANDERSON d/b/a West-Land Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Louis C. ONSAGER, Mary Onsager, his wife, Gerald Graf, Betty Graf, his wife, and First National Bank of Sturgeon Bay, a national banking corporation, Defendants-Respondents. No. 88-1812. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued March 27, 1990.

412 A.2d 71 (1980) Diane MacDONALD et al. v. Theodore MacDONALD. Chester P. PRUSINSKI v. Dorothy S. PRUSINSKI. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. March 12, 1980. Willard & Kellis, Basil L. Kellis, Sanford, Smith, Elliott, Wood & Nelson, Stephen R. Lamson (orally), Karen B. Lovell, Saco, for Chester P. Prusinski. Kenneth C. Young, Jr., Somerville, Mass. (oral