Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I

CONNOLLY, Judge Appellants brought product-liability actions in state and federal courts, alleging that respondent's forced-air warming device (FAWD) used to maintain patients' normal body temperature during surgery increased the risk of surgical-site infection (SSI). Each party moved to exclude the *19other party's experts; appellants moved to ad

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1603 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Plaintiff, and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY; AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATIO

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-002611 Appeal From Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5858 Heard November 2, 2020 – Filed September 1, 2021

155 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 31183-15. Filed November 18, 2020. P, a U.S. corporation, was the legal owner of the intellectual property (IP) necessary to manufacture, distribute, and sell some of the best-known beverage brands in the world. This IP included trade- marks, product names, lo

906 F.2d 369 The FALKIRK MINING COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,Appellant/Cross-appellee,v.The JAPAN STEEL WORKS, LIMITED, a corporation of Japan, andJapan Steel Works America, Inc., a New Yorkcorporation, Appellees/Cross-appellants. Nos. 89-5189, 89-5207. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March 16, 1990.Decided June 26, 1990.<

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 211 ON REHEARING On original submission the appeal in this case was dismissed, and the author of that opinion was Supernumerary Judge T. Werth Thagard. After rehearing was applied for but before a decision could be made, Judge Thagard died. The case was reassigned to the author of the opinion o

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge SHEDD joined. Judge WYNN wrote a dissenting opinion. AGEE, Circuit Judge: In the early 1980s, Georgia Power, a utility company that supplies power to most of Georgia, sold many of its used electrical transformers at auction to Ward Transformer Company (“Ward”). These electrical transformers contained insulating oil, and some

Pastor David BACON, Patricia Hepner, Ruth Dold, Sharon Hvam, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Retirement Plan and the ELCA Retirement Plan for the Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Appellants, v. BOARD OF PENSIONS OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA d/b/a Portico Benefit Services, Respondent.REYES, Judge

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior U.S. District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff, National Jewish Health’s, Motion For Rule 37 Sanctions [ECF No. 72] and Special Master, Ronald J. Hedges’, Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law On Plaintiffs Motion For Sanctions And Recommendation (“Recommendation”) [ECF No. 156]. On January 13, 2014,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AARON MULVEY and CAROLYN MULVEY, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 18-3119 (CKK) v. AMERICAN AIRLINES INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 6, 2019)

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge The plaintiffs, a number of individuals who are eligible to vote in Wisconsin, filed this suit in 2011, alleging that Wisconsin’s law requiring them to present photo identification at the polls, 2011 Wis. Act 23 (“Act 23”), violates the Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Following a trial on the claims alleged in this and a companion case,

*263OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. This case arises from an antitrust action brought by ZF Meritor, LLC (“ZF Meritor”) and Meritor Transmission Corporation (“Meritor”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”) for allegedly anticompetitive practices in the heavy-duty truck transmissions market. The practices at issu

CARNES, Circuit Judge: People who compete against each other in the same business or profession don’t have to dislike one another. A few years back there was even a song lyricizing *1215 about “Lawyers in Love.” But no one has ever written a song about “Car Dealers in Love,” and if this case is a

Case: 10-15761 Date Filed: 06/21/2012 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

McCULLOUGH, Judge. *671 Plaintiff Richard Spoor appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants John M. Barth and *672 John M. Barth, Jr. Based on th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge: Pending before the court is Defendant Grote Industries, Inc.’s1 “Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively to Transfer Venue.” (Dkt. No. 12.) For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. This matter is hereby transferred to the New Albany Division of the Southern District of Indiana.

Justice EID, dissenting. Today the majority holds that the question of whether the plaintiff has produced sufficient evidence to meet the requirements of class certification is purely a discretionary matter for the trial court to decide. In my view, the majority's standardless approach makes class certification in Colorado essentially unreviewable by appellate courts and raises serious procedural due process