⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dale A. Hahn”

Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011-03-31 · Published · cited 10× · 15 A.3d 1026; 2011 R.I. LEXIS 40; 2011 WL 1196896
OPINION This case is before the Supreme Court on appeal by Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate or defendant) from the grant of a permanent injunction against Allstate in the Providence County Superior Court. The plaintiff, Ashley Hahn (Hahn or plaintiff), sought injunctive relief against the defendant based on its refusal to submit to an appraisal of damages caused by fire at the plaintiffs house. On appeal, Allstate argues: (1) that the trial justic
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT WILLIAM DAVID HAHN, Appellant, v. ERICA HAHN, BROOKE HAHN, ALAN WEINSTEIN, as Trustee, WAYNE KAPLAN, and WAYNE KAPLAN, P.A., Appellees. No. 4D17-3919 [April 10, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Dale v. Hahnpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973-09-24 · Published · cited 8× · 486 F.2d 76
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: These cross-appeals are from an order entered May 7, 1973 in the Southern District of New York, Whitman Knapp, District Judge, which (1) held that the 1962 state court order declaring plaintiff-appellee-appellant Rita Hooper Dale (“appellee”) to be incompetent and appointing a committee to manage her affairs was null and void ab initio; and (2) directed the return to appellee by def endants-app
Dale v. Hahnpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974-01-09 · Published · cited 4× · 486 F.2d 76
486 F.2d 76 Rita Hooper DALE, a former incompetent person,Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant,v.Demarest J. HAHN, individually and as committee of theperson and property of Rita Hooper Dale, et al.,Defendants-Appellants-Appellees. No. 1081, 1098, Dockets 73-1795, 73-1934. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued June 28, 1973.Decided Sept. 2
People v. Grovespublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2003-03-20 · Published · cited 14× · 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 744; 107 Cal. App. 4th 1227; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 4121; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3220; 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 569
* The request of counsel for respondent for partial publication of this court's March 20, 2003, opinion is granted and it is hereby ordered that said opinion, with the exception of parts I. and III., be published in the Official Reports. A jury convicted appellant Brandon E. Groves of two counts each of forcible oral copulation, kidnapping and carjacking, all committed in 1999. (See Pen. Code,
Dale v. Hahnpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971-02-19 · Published · cited 27× · 440 F.2d 633; 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1196; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11743
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: In 1951 plaintiff Rita Dale was involuntarily committed to Harlem Valley State Hospital in Wingdale, New York. She contends that she was committed as an alcoholic while the defendants contend that she was committed as a mental incompetent. In 1962, allegedly in order to facilitate payment to the New York Department of Mental Hygiene of amounts claimed to be due for services and treatment rendered to
Dale v. Hahnpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1970-03-26 · Published · cited 7× · 311 F. Supp. 1293; 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12344
OPINION COOPER, District Judge. This is a purported class action by plaintiff Dale (1) for a declaratory judgment that section 102 of the Mental Hygiene Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 27 of the State of New York (formerly § 1374 of the Civil Practice Act), which provides a procedure for the appointment of a committee for a patient of a state mental institution, denies plaintiff due process and the equ
People v. Roundtreepublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2000-01-21 · Published · cited 8× · 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 921; 77 Cal. App. 4th 846; 2000 D.A.R. 897; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 589; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 897; 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 39
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II and III. Alphonso Eddie Roundtree (appellant) appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of rape (Pen. Code1, § 261, subd. (a)(2)); unlawful sexual intercourse (§ 261.
California Court of Appeal · 1996-10-17 · Published · cited 8× · 49 Cal. App. 4th 1781; 57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 611; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7706; 96 Daily Journal DAR 12679; 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 982
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1783 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1784 OPINION This court issued an alternative writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
District Court, D. Idaho · 2017-03-30 · Published · cited 1× · 320 F.R.D. 226; 102 Fed. R. Serv. 1458; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48093; 2017 WL 1193726
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO STRIKE (DKT. 18, 22) Honorable Candy W. Dale, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Criminal Records and Related Information (Dkt. 18) and Motion to Strike Inadmissible Documents and Statements (Dkt. 22), both filed in response to materials submitted by Defendants in support of t
Hahn v. Rauchpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008-08-15 · Published · cited 7× · 602 F. Supp. 2d 895; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108792; 2008 WL 5716109
(2008) Robert L. HAHN, Plaintiff, v. Daniel J. RAUCH, et al., Defendants. Case No. 5:08CV1204. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 15, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. This case is before the Court on a motion to remand based upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by th
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-29 · Published · cited 21× · 100 F.4th 122
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1721 Doc: 130 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM
People v. Keenanpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1991-01-29 · Published · cited 33× · 227 Cal. App. 3d 26; 277 Cal. Rptr. 687; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 820; 91 Daily Journal DAR 1330; 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 104
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976 and 976.1, this opinion is certified for partial publication. The portions directed to be published follow. OPINION Appellant Jeffrey Adam Keenan appeals following his conviction of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), forcible sodomy (
Hahn v. Nethpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005-07-15 · Published · cited 43× · 270 Neb. 164; 699 N.W.2d 32; 2005 Neb. LEXIS 127
270 Neb. 164 EDWARD A. HAHN, APPELLEE, v. BEVERLY NETH, DIRECTOR, STATE OF NEBRASKA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, APPELLANT. No. S-04-560. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed July 15, 2005. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Milissa Johnson-Wiles for appellant. David W. Jorgensen, of Nye, Hervert, Jorgensen & Watson, P.C., for appellee. HENDRY, C.J.,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-09-01 · Published · cited 150× · 869 F.3d 1204
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge. L On July 1, 2002, the State of Alabama chose lethal injection, rather than electrocution, as its preferred method of implementing capital punishment. 1 The Alabama Department of Corrections (“ADOC”) thereafter adopted a three-drug protocol to administer the injection.
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2019-04-29 · Published · cited 2× · 827 S.E.2d 417; 241 W. Va. 629
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2019 Term FILED April 29, 2019 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 18-0018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-06-30 · Published · cited 31× · 861 F.3d 678; 2017 WL 2821877; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11766
SYKES, Circuit Judge. We are again asked to decide whether an aspect of Indiana’s alcohol regulation system violates the Equal Protection Clause. Two years, ago we upheld an *680Indiana law that prohibits grocery and convenience stores from selling chilled beer. See Indiana Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Ass’n v. Cook, 808 F.3d 318 (7th Cir. 2015
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 88 N.M. 492; 542 P.2d 1182
OPINION SUTIN, Judge. Four property owners-taxpayers appeal from an Order and Decision of the county valuation protests board located in the county in which each taxpayer’s land is situated. These counties are Lincoln and Ber-nalillo. Because they present the same or related questions, we have consolidated these cases for review. Each board d
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004-01-06 · Published · cited 129× · 354 F.3d 305; 63 Fed. R. Serv. 243; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 76; 2003 WL 23105180
OPINION WILKINS, Chief Judge. Dale McCourtney Hodge appeals his convictions and sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000), and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (West 1999). Finding no error, we affirm. I.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2022-06-29 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00583-CV Kevin DOTY and Elizabeth Doty, Appellants v. Richard DAVIDSON and Javline Ranch (a General Partnership), a/k/a Javelin R