Cases

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOZ L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 18, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was ente

559 F.Supp.2d 722 (2008) Hedwig A. MARCH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-2093-G. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. June 2, 2008. *723 Cheryl Chapman Langston, Law Office of Cheryl Chapman Langston, Forney, TX, for Plaintiff. Shane R

567 F.Supp.2d 893 (2008) Tamara Jean BRAGG, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1409-N (BH). United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. June 6, 2008. *896 Cheryl Chapman Langston, Law Office of Cheryl Chapman Langston, Forney, TX, for Plaintiff.

609 F.Supp.2d 607 (2009) David J. GASPARD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER. No. 1:07-CV-943. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. April 8, 2009. *609 Steven S. Packard of Packard Packard & LaPray, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff. Earnie Artsauna Joe of Social Security Administrati

537 F.Supp.2d 823 (2008) Lela M. McNAIR, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1889-B (BH). United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 6, 2008. *824 Elizabeth B. Dunlap, Law Office of Elizabeth B. Dunlap, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. Stephen P.

GRASZ, Circuit Judge. Dwain Bagwell appeals the district court's 1 judgment that the Social Security *1119 Administration ("SSA") Commissioner's decision to deny him disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge, dissents. SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. *552 Appellant Jeffrey Walker appeals the district court's judgment, which affirmed the decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) denying him disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income unde

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. *548 Jennie Adkins left her job as a hospice volunteer coordinator in September 2013, when she was 54 years old. She applied for Social Security disability benefits in March 2015, claiming she had been disabled since September 2013. After her initial application was den

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Jessie Mae Nash appeals the judgment of the district court upholding the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Christopher Stanton appeals a judgment of the district court upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of his applications for child insurance benefits and supplemental security income. An administrative law judge, relying on testimony from a vocational expert, concluded that Stanton's limitations did not prevent him from performing certain jobs in the

278 F.Supp.2d 797 (2003) Henry T. BRIDGES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. 3:01-CV-00413-G. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. July 29, 2003. *798 *799 Ronald D Honig, Law Office of Ronald D Honig, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff.<

ORDER HANNAH, District Judge. CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION the above-styled and numbered civil action, the court having heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge at Beaumont, Texas, for proper consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and considered the Report of the United States M

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Sharon Y. Travis appeals the dismissal of her disability-insurance and supplement-security-income claims. The district court 1 dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, on the merits. Having authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms on the merits.

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Phyllis Cox applied for disability insurance benefits alleging she could not work because of back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and other ailments. After a second remand from the district court under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), an admin *904 istrative law judge (ALJ) d

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Belinda Smith (Smith) appeals the district court’s order ■ upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (Commissioner) denial of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand to the Commissioner for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND

368 F.3d 1045 Sharon HATCHER, Appellant,v.Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Appellee. No. 03-3459. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 16, 2004. Filed: May 28, 2004. 1 E. Gregory Wallace, argu

PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Gabriel M. Martinez appeals from the order entered by the district court affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act. Exercising jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we a

416 F.3d 886 Debra VESTER, Appellant,v.Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Appellee. No. 04-2140. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 10, 2005. Filed: July 27, 2005. E. Gregory Wallace, argued, Buies Creek, NC (Anthony W. Bartels

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. The district court 1 affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of Ms. Clay’s claim for social security disability benefits. On appeal, Ms. Clay argues that her ■ physical and mental impairments, taken together, meet Listing 12.05(C) for mental retardation. See 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Rosalie Grissom (Grissom) appeals the district court’s decision upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (Commissioner) denial of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. We reverse and remand with instructions for the district court to remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. I. BACKG