Cases

355 So.2d 1033 (1978) Horace McKINLEY v. Samuel S. DALTON and Richard F. Davis. No. 8765. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. February 14, 1978. *1034 Earl B. Gray, Metairie, for defendant-appellant. Gerald P. Aurillo, Metairie, for plaintiffsappellees. Before REDMANN, BOUTALL and BEER, JJ. BEER, Ju

This is an action instituted to recover damages resulting from injuries to Marie L. McKinley, wife of H.G. McKinley, while Mr. and Mrs. McKinley were riding in an automobile as guests of defendant. The trial court found that defendant was guilty of gross negligence which was the proximate cause of the injury, and that H.G. McKinley was guilty of negligence which proximately contributed to the injury of his wife, which negligence was imputed to her and barred recovery for both. Plaintiffs have

503 S.E.2d 559 (1998) 232 Ga. App. 659 McKINLEY v. CITY OF CARTERSVILLE. No. A98A0426. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 26, 1998. Henderson & Associates, Daniel L. Henderson, Marietta, Chad A. McGowan, Atlanta, for appellant. Jenkins & Nelson, G. Carey Nelson III, Peter R. Olson, Cartersville, for appellee. BIRDSONG, Pre

955 F.2d 1388 60 USLW 2587, 1992-1 Trade Cases P 69,710,22 Fed.R.Serv.3d 161 Kenneth P. COFFEY, M.D., Plaintiff,andDavid High, Appellant,v.HEALTHTRUST, INC., a Delaware corporation, Edmond MemorialHospital, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, Joel A. Hart,McKinley D. Moore, James E. Dalton, Jr., Charles R. Brown,Larry K. Killebrew, M.D., individuals, Defendants-Appellees.Kenneth P. COFFEY

OPINION and JUDGMENT DALTON, District Judge. This is an action for damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 brought by a former prisoner at the Page County Jail against the Sheriff of this county. The plaintiff charges that he was isolated for a period of fifteen days without any charge being levelled against him or any probable cause for such incident. He asserts the loss of certain privileges and seeks the

Memorandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and Motion to Strike [DN 36] of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (“Bayer”). Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the Court holds that Bayer’s motion to dismiss [DN 36] is GRANTED in part

BARNES, Presiding Judge. Following a bench trial, Brenda M. Hudson appeals the final order and judgment in this boundary line and trespass case. She contends that the trial court erred in finding an ambiguity in the parties’ initial settlement agreement, that the court’s order accepting the agreement was final and could not be modified outside that term of court in which it had been entered, and that the court erred in its f

3 Kan. App. 2d 188 (1979) 592 P.2d 117 MARY R. CLAWSON, Appellant, v. CHESTER GARRISON and PAULINE GARRISON, and Substituted Defendants JAMES BORTH and PAULINE GARRISON, Co-Executors under the Last Will and Testament of Otto Borth, Deceased, Appellees. No. 49,064 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed March 23, 1979. Arthur B. McKinley,

1 F.3d 1101 62 USLW 2115, 1993-2 Trade Cases 70,327,26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 604 Kenneth P. COFFEY, M.D., Plaintiff,David High, Real Party in Interest-Appellant,v.HEALTHTRUST, INC., a Delaware corporation, Edmond MemorialHospital, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, Joel A. Hart,McKinley D. Moore, James E. Dalton, Jr., Charles R. Brown,and Larry K. Killebrew, M.D., individuals, Defendants-Appellees.

Peterson, Judge. Richard Langdeau, Jr., and Ashley Langdeau (the “Langdeaus”) filed suit against Hungry Wolf/Sugar & Spice (“Hungry Wolf”), alleging that Hungry Wolf was vicariously liable for the tortious actions of its alleged employee, and that it negligently hired and retained the employee. The trial court denied Hungry Wolf’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that a police report submitted by the Langdeaus cre

SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, P. J., GOBEIL and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June

FOURTH DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., COOMER and MARKLE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 25,

Plaintiffs in error, the record and equitable owners of a vacant lot in Broken Arrow, Okla., prior to its resale for delinquent taxes in 1942, instituted this action, as plaintiffs, to quiet their title to said lot against defendant in error, as defendant and the purchaser of said lot at said resale The trial court determined from the evidence that defendant's resale deed was valid and entered judgment quieting his title accordingly. As plaintiffs have appealed and the parties appear herein i

SETH, Circuit Judge. In these two appeals, consolidated for argument and for purposes of this opinion; we are asked to determine: first, whether an exclusive contract between a radiologist, defendant Larry Killebrew, and a hospital, defendant Edmond Memorial Hospital (EMH), together with the exclusion of *1390plaintiff, the former radiologist at EMH, violate Sectio

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a motion for partial summary judgment by Defendants, the District of Columbia (hereinafter the “District”) and current and former District employees Olivia Golden, Lloyd J. Jordon, Elanor Sanders, Erica Sweeney, Judith Abunaw, I

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: This is an appeal of an order entering Rule 11 sanctions against plaintiffs attorney for filing with the district court an economic study and an accompanying brief which the district court held purposely misconstrued the effect of that study. The district court imposed a sanction of $10,000 to be paid personally by the attorney to defendants under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE MARCH 31, 2022 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON MARCH 31, 2022 ERIN L. LENNON SUPR

NEELY, Justice: Giles Jones appeals an order of the hearing examiner for the West Virginia Education and State Employees Grievance Board that denied a grievance filed by Mr. Jones, challenging the refusal of the appellee, Monroe County Board of Education (“the Board”), to place him in the position of director of curriculum and instruction. Mr. Jones alleged that despite qualifications superior to and experience and seniority

626 S.E.2d 541 (2006) 277 Ga. App. 350 GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. v. HIGDON et al. No. A05A2084. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 24, 2006. *542 Mills & Moss, David C. Moss, Paul J. Dzikowski, Lawrenceville, for appellants. McCamy, Phillips, Tuggle & Fordham, Charles L.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00736-CV Robyn Lynn SHALIT, Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Michael Lawrence SHALIT,