Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Apr 15 2020, 9:13 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO

92 P.3d 1076 (2004) 140 Idaho 329 Linda CABALLERO, Gary Haar, Dana Thorne, Tom Kulm, and the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. David WIKSE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 27995. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2003 Term. April 22, 2004. *1077 Huntley Park LLP, Boise, for app

616 N.W.2d 59 (2000) 9 Neb. App. 598 In re ESTATE OF Beulah Truvett ELLIS, deceased. Jeremiah Wade, appellant, v. Christian Crusaders, appellee. No. A-99-630. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. August 15, 2000. *62 Vard R. Johnson, of Broom, Johnson & Clarkson, Omaha, for appellant. Gerald P. Lau

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

120 F.Supp.2d 503 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Marvin PESSES, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 90-654. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 21, 2000. Robert L. Eberhardt, United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Robert C. Goodman, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Carl Strass,

523 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2007) HEADLANDS RESERVE; LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS MANAGEMENT, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, Defendant. No. SACV 07-00203-CJC(AJWx). United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. November 16, 2007. *1114

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT X CORP., No. 24-271 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-01939- WBS-AC v. ROBERT BONTA, in his official OPINION capacity as Attorney General of California, Defendant - Appellee. A

896 A.2d 271 (2006) 2006 ME 48 A. Michelle COBB v. BOARD OF COUNSELING PROFESSIONALS LICENSURE. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: June 15, 2005. Decided: May 3, 2006. *272 Rufus E. Brown, Esq. (orally), M. Thomasine Burke, Esq., Brown & Burke, Portland, for plaintiff. G. Steven Rowe, Atto

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-3124 ____________ RHONDA H. WILSON; THE LAW OFFICES OF RHONDA HILL WILSON, P.C., Appellants v. USI INSURANCE SERVICE LLC; HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ____________ On Appeal from the

883 So.2d 46 (2004) Edwin WELSH v. William M. MOUNGER, II, E.B. Martin, Jr., MSM, Inc. and Mercury Wireless Management, Inc. No. 2002-CA-01245-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 1, 2004. Rehearing Denied October 7, 2004. *47 Grady F. Tollison, Jr., E. Farish Percy, Osford, John Leonard Walker, Phillip J. Bro

274 Kan. 735 (2002) 56 P.3d 235 VAUGHN LOWER and SHARON LOWER, Appellants, v. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HASKELL COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT, STEVE WEIDNER, RODNEY WEEKS, EUGENE WRIGHT, DANA LEONARD, HELEN HALL, RUBY RUTLEDGE and MIKE SHERWOOD, all in their official capacities as members Of THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HASKELL COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT, Appellees. No. 87,863. Su

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-01245-SCT EDWIN WELSH v. WILLIAM M. MOUNGER, II, E. B. MARTIN, JR., MSM, INC. AND MERCURY WIRELESS MANAGEMENT, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 6/27/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DENISE OWENS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: GRADY F. TOLLISON, JR. E. F

873 So.2d 108 (2004) MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. Maretha A. JOHNSON. No. 2002-CA-02100-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 13, 2004. *109 Dana Gail Deaton, Chris H. Deaton, Tupelo, attorneys for appellant. Bo Russell, Frank A. Russell, attorneys for appellee. EN BANC. CARLSON, Justice, for

140 P.3d 1235 (2006) 2006 UT 40 AMERICAN BUSH, a Utah corporation; Jerry Phelps, dba Paradise Modeling; Brent E. Reid, dba All for Love; Gayle Petersen, dba Leather and Lace, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE, a municipal corporation, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20020117. Supreme Court of Utah. July 28, 2006.

Kottmyer, J. Introduction Plaintiffs, Rahim Rashad, Rahim Rasheed Abubardar and Dana Charles are Muslims who are prisoners in the custody of the Department of Correction (“DOC”).1 Defendants are Michael Maloney, Commissioner of DOC, and Peter Pepe, former superintendent of MCI-Shirley. The plaintiffs allege, inter alia, violations of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-02100-SCT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. MARETHA A. JOHNSON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/12/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD D. BOWEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PRENTISS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DANA GAIL DEATON

WALLIN, J., Dissenting. The majority’s decision to apply primary assumption of risk to deny recovery to Francine Herrle relies on a misstatement of the relationship between Herrle and Marshall and ignores modem beliefs and legal requirements concerning the treatment of our most vulnerable elderly citizens. It is both bad law and bad policy. Francine Herrle was employed as a nurse’s aide at a convalescent hosp

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

LINN, Circuit Judge. Ficosa North America Corporation, Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. de C.V. (“Ficosa”) appeal the final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan entered in favor of Teleflex, Inc. (“Teleflex”). The district court entered judgment following a jury verdict that Ficosa infringed Tele-flex’s U.S. Patent No. 5,632,18