Cases

KANNE, Circuit Judge. After being passed over for a promotion and transferred to another facility, plaintiff-appellant, Dana Hoffman-Dombrowski (Dombrowski) filed suit in federal court alleging that her employer, Arlington International Racecourse, Inc., engaged in unlawful sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §

367 B.R. 409 (2007) In re DANA CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 06-10354 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. April 19, 2007. *410 Corinne Ball, Pedro A. Jimenez, Richard Engman, Jones Day, Robert J. Feinstein, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, Jones & Weintraub P.C., New York City, for Dana Corporation. Andrew

JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge. *220Defendants Lifespan Corporation, Rhode Island Hospital, and Michael Susienka ("Defendants") move to dismiss Plaintiff Dr. Damian Medici's Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE f Plaintiff Damian Medici filed his complaint on February 17, 2016, alleging that Defendants violated contractual obligations and federal regulations while investigating him for research misconduct, resulting in the loss of his employment and research grants. [ECF No',1' lj. On Ap

AFFIRM; Opinion Filed April 16, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01334-CR PAUL THOMAS GILLAM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District C

770 A.2d 611 (2001) 2001 ME 71 ST. PAUL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. James P. HAYES. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs: April 24, 2001. Decided: May 4, 2001. *612 Robert O. Newton, Esq., Christopher D. Nyhan, Esq., Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau, Pachios & Haley, LLC, Portland, for plainti

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALESIA, District Judge. Before the court is defendant Arlington International Racecourse, Incorporated’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following reasons, the court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff Dana Hoff

85 F.Supp.2d 109 (2000) Laura OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. COLE GIFT CENTERS, INC., Defendant. No. 3:9702595(GLG). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 17, 2000. *110 Ruth L. Pulda, Peter D. Goselin, Livingston, Adler, Pulda & Meiklejohn, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff. Peter A. Janus, Paul H. Gamache, Siegel,

25 F.Supp.2d 33 (1998) George COWEN v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION. No. 3:97CV576 (AHN). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 10, 1998. *34 Paul J. Dorsi, Law Offices of Jerome A. Lacobelle, West Haven, CT, for Plaintiff. Richard D. O'Connor, Dana Shaw MacKinnon, Siegel, O'Connor, Schiff & Zangari, H

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 354, is denied.

PER CURIAM: Jose Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for review based on grounds of newly discovered evidence and information discovered after judgment.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lopez v. Young, No. 7:01-cv-00876-jct (W.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We also deny Lopez’ motion to lift stay and fo

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 716 This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Seneca County revoking appellant's shock probation. On September 11, 1989, appellant Brian Ferguson went to his probation officer's office to provide her with a urine specimen for drug testing. Upon failing the test for cocaine use, appella

WINSOR, J. In this appeal, we must determine what happens when a defendant alleges she discovered facts undermining her judge’s impartiality only after the judge denied her postconviction motion. Although the rules of criminal procedure provide no direct answer, Florida Supreme Court precedent allows a defendant in this circumstance to file a successive rule 3.850 motion. We therefore reverse the order on appeal, and we remand

RYA W. ZOBEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *302Plaintiffs Kimberly Herman, Amy Lestage, and Kevin Roseff are current and former employees of a durable medical equipment manufacturer called Coloplast Corp. They bring this case as qui tam relators and allege in Counts IV, V, VI, and VII of their Third Amended Complaint th

353 B.R. 324 (2006) In re GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORP. I, et al., Debtors. Sam J. Alberts, Trustee for the DCHC Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, v. Paul Tuft, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-02250, Adversary No. 04-10459. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia. September 21, 2006. As Amended September 26, 2006.

RYA W. ZOBEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *360Defendant Shield California Health Care Center, Inc. ("Shield"), moves pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings. See Docket # 302. It argues that plaintiff-relators' action should be dismissed under the False Claims Act's ("FCA") "government action bar,"

233 F.Supp.2d 789 (2002) MICROSTRATEGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. BUSINESS OBJECTS, S.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-CV-826. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. October 22, 2002. *790 Thomas J. Cawley, Ingo Frank Burghardt, Hunton & Williams, McLean, VA, Benita Webster Ellen, Hunton & Williams, Norfol

Daly, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (2).1 The defendant claims that the court erred (1) in denying his two amended motions to suppress, (2) in admitting the testimony of an incompetent witness regarding the value of the items allegedly stolen, and (3) in denying his motion for

*1189ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING DEFENDANT HIREASE’S JOINDER IN MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ronald Gillette began driving for Uber in the San Francisco Bay Area in March 2013. Gillette Docket No. 7 at ¶

331 F.Supp.2d 396 (2004) MICROSTRATEGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. BUSINESS OBJECTS, S.A., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-CV-826. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. August 6, 2004. *397 *398 *399 *400