Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel A. Guy”
Guy v. Guypublic domain
CLIFFORD, J. [¶ 1] Linda J. Guy appeals from an amended divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Millinocket, Stitham, J.) on David R. Guy Jr.’s complaint. Linda contends that the court erred when it characterized certain property as marital, and divided that property between her and David. Because we agree, in part, with Linda’s contentions, we vacate the judgment and remand the matter to the District Court
Opinion issued December 29, 2005 In The Court of Appeals <
In Re Guypublic domain
969 A.2d 373 (2009) In the Matter of Joni GUY and Daniel R. Guy. No. 2008-186. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: February 12, 2009. Opinion Issued: March 5, 2009. *374 Francis G. Holland, of Nashua, by brief and orally, for the petitioner. William Aivalikles, of Nashua, by brief and orally, for the responden
United States v. Guypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Allen Guy seeks a reduction in his sentence, arguing that the District Court failed to consider whether his age, medical condition, and cooperation with the government warranted a sentence below the applicable guideline range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because we conclude that the District Court adequately weighed these considerations, we will affirm the order
United States v. Guypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Allen Guy seeks a reduction in his sentence, arguing that the District Court failed to consider whether his age, medical condition, and cooperation with the government warranted a sentence below the applicable guideline range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because we conclude that the District Court adequately weighed these considerations, we will affirm the order
Winchell v. Guypublic domain
857 N.E.2d 1024 (2006) Sonya WINCHELL, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Remco GUY, Ariel Graham and Fort Wayne Area Taco Bell Restaurant Owners Association, d/b/a Taco Bell, Appellee-Defendants. No. 90A02-0604-CV-346. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 6, 2006. *1026 Samuel W. Jarjour, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Dan
Price v. Guypublic domain
735 A.2d 668 (1999) Deborah L. PRICE and Harry F. Price, Appellants, v. Anthony B. GUY and Thomas R. Stine, Appellees. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 17, 1998. Decided July 23, 1999. *669 Jeffrey W. Stover, Bellefonte, for Deborah & Harry Price. Daniel McGee, State College, for Anthony Guy. Befor
Yasmeen Daniel v. Armslist, LLCpublic domain
2019 WI 47 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP344 COMPLETE TITLE: Yasmeen Daniel, Individually, and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Zina Daniel Haughton, Plaintiff-Appellant, Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, as Subrogee for
Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Services, Inc.public domain
HUMPHREY, J. [¶1] Sydney A. TerMorshuizen and Patricia A. TerMorshuizen appeal from a summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Horton, J. ) in favor of Spurwink Services, Inc. (Spurwink) on the TerMorshuizens' claim for overtime pay pursuant to 26 M.R.S. § 664 (2018). In this appeal we consider whether interruptions to "sleep time" are compe
J.A. Croson Co. v. J.A. Guy, Inc.public domain
Cook, J. JOB TARGETING The legal dispute in this case centers on Local 189’s use of a job targeting program. Job targeting is a strategy employed nationwide by construction unions, with the cooperation of unionized contractors, in response to declining union membership and the expanding market penetration of nonunion construction. See Northup & White, Subsidizing Contractors to Gain Employmen
Guy's Concrete, Inc. v. Crawfordpublic domain
793 N.E.2d 288 (2003) GUY'S CONCRETE, INC. and Modern Heating & Cooling, Inc., Appellants-Defendants, v. Dawn CRAWFORD and Scott Crawford, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 45A03-0210-CV-343. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 18, 2003. *291 Frederick J. Ball, Highland, IN, Attorneys for Appellant Guy's Concrete, Inc. Daniel
Commonwealth v. Guypublic domain
454 Pa. Superior Ct. 582 (1996) 686 A.2d 397 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Kenneth A. GUY, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 1, 1996. Filed November 18, 1996. Reargument Denied January 14, 1997. *585 Wayne B. Gongaware, Assistant District Attorney, G
Guy A. Matteson, Iii v. Ryder System Inc.public domain
99 F.3d 108 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2740, 132 Lab.Cas. P 11,690 Guy A. MATTESON, III; Timothy L. Bell; Thomas Gati; BrentE. Rozell; Lenworth Brown; Barris A. Cameron; CraigCanady, Sr.; Michael Clayton; William Colon; JosephCourter; Michael Cruz; Willie Davis, Jr.; Earl W. Dawson;Charles W. Dudley; Mordechai Epstein; Robert E. Fedak;Joseph DeGuida; Joseph E. Henry; Vaughn L. Huron; Donald
Daniel v. Falcon Interest Realty Corp.public domain
190 S.W.3d 177 (2005) Guy J. DANIEL, Individually and d/b/a Guy J. Daniel Construction Co. and Lesha Daniel, Individually and d/b/a Ja-Le & Associates, Appellants, v. FALCON INTEREST REALTY CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 01-03-00130-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). December 29, 2005. *180 Guy J. Daniel, Lesha A
IN THE MATTER OF THE CARE ) AND TREATMENT OF ) DANIEL BOHANNON ) a/k/a DANIEL R. BOHANNON, ) a/k/a DANIEL RAY BOHANNON, ) a/k/a DANIEL BOHANNAN, ) No. SD35087 a/k/a DANIEL R. BOHANNAN, ) a/k/a DANIEL RAY BOHANNAN, ) Filed: June 18, 2019 a/k/a DANIEL R. BOHANON, )
CHARLES H. GUY, IV v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A.public domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHARLES H. GUY, IV, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy Fotipublic domain
MESKILL, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to determine the extent of the government’s interest in real property forfeited to it by a criminal defendant. In particular, our question is whether, with respect to real property, the use of the term “property” in the criminal forfeiture statute, 21 U.S.C. § 853, refers to a parcel of land or to the defendant’s interest in that l
People v. Guypublic domain
2025 IL 129967 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 129967) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. TRAVARIS T. GUY, Appellee. Opinion filed April 24,
People v. Guypublic domain
2023 IL App (3d) 210423 Opinion filed July 26, 2023 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2023 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
Daniel Wilson v. Guy Piercepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 09-2111 D ANIEL W. W ILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D ONALD G AETZ, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 3:08-CV-03153-JES—Jeanne E. Scott, Judge. A R