Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel Eugene Lane”
Eugene Sand & Gravel v. Lane Countypublic domain
74 P.3d 1085 (2003) 189 Or. App. 21 EUGENE SAND & GRAVEL, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, and Oregon Concrete and Aggregate Producers Association, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. LANE COUNTY, Thistledown Farm, and Lone Pine Farms, Ltd., Respondents-Cross-Petitioners, and Karen Reed, Respondent below. 2002-068; A120975. Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Handy v. Lane Countypublic domain
KISTLER, J. The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration consistent with this decision. *607 KISTLER, J. Oregon’s public meetings law provides that a quo
Rosy Blue, NV v. Lanepublic domain
767 F.Supp.2d 860 (2011) ROSY BLUE, NV, Plaintiff, v. Edmond John LANE, Jr., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:10CV205. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 7, 2011. *862 Garry William O'Donnell, Yoss LLP, Boca Raton, FL, Kenyetta N. Alexander, Mark R. Osherow, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. <
Moe v. Eugene Zurbrugg Construction Co.public domain
123 P.3d 338 (2005) 202 Or. App. 577 Donald L. MOE, Jr., Respondent, v. EUGENE ZURBRUGG CONSTRUCTION CO., an Oregon corporation; Park Lanes, Inc., an Oregon corporation; and Park Lanes of Hillsboro, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Appellants. 0012-12966; A120140. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 16, 2005.
Daniel Eugene Anderson v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00062-CR DANIEL EUGENE ANDERSON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT
Lane v. Brownpublic domain
970 P.2d 206 (1998) 328 Or. 42 Christopher LANE, Petitioner on Review, v. Robert Larry BROWN, Respondent on Review, Laurie Joy Inger, Petitioner on Review, v. Robert Larry Brown, Respondent on Review. CC 93-73, CC 93-7; A84805 (Control); A84806; SC S42992. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 14, 1997. Reassi
Lane v. R.A. Sims, Jr., Inc.public domain
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: For this negligence action arising out of a collision at a crossing between a train and a vehicle, primarily at issue is whether the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), 49 U.S.C. §§ 20101-20153, and a regulation promulgated thereunder, 49 C.F.R. § 213.9, which set maximum train speeds for different classes of tracks, preclude a railroad em
Hart, Eugenepublic domain
§§3)3'7 7 f©} Eugene Hart #541604 MI. Unit 2664 FM 2054 Tennessee Colony TX.75886 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P.O. BOX 12308 Capitol Station Austin Texas 78711 Re: Parte Eugene Hart Trial Court cause NO.509703-A Post Conviction writ Application Article ll.07 TCCP Proceedings In The 209th District Court of Harris County Texas and a Application of a writ of Mandamus that was filediJlthe Court<IECriminal appeals Writ'NO.'WR-83,377-4l Dear Clerk, I am submitting this letter to you about my ll.
Baker Ex Rel. Estate of Herron v. Lane Countypublic domain
33 F.Supp.2d 1291 (1999) Constance BAKER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ricky G. Herron, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY, Michael Boggs, Carol John, Ann Marie Hays, Steven C. Goins, Glenn W. Morgan, Reed Kratka, Jeffrey Robbins, and PeaceHealth, a non-profit Washington Corporation, doing business as Sacred Heart General Hospital, Defendants. No. Civ. 97-20-TC. United States District Court, D. Oreg
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-KA-00806-COA EUGENE BUTLER A/K/A EUGENE MICHAEL APPELLANT BUTLER, JR. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/21/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PAUL BOURGEOIS JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT A
Handy v. Lane Countypublic domain
No. 73 November 25, 2016 605 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Rob HANDY, Respondent on Review, v. LANE COUNTY, Jay Bozievich, Sid Leiken and Faye Stewart, Petitioners on Review. (CC 161213685; CA A153507; SC S063725) En Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.*
State of Tennessee v. Reuben Eugene Mitchellpublic domain
12/07/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 22, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. REUBEN EUGENE MITCHELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 102034 Steve Sword, Judge No. E2017-01739-CCA-R3-CD A Knox County
Lane v. United Statespublic domain
NICHOLS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant moves for rehearing and there is no cross-motion. Our decision, Lane v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 209, 633 F. 2d 1384 (1980), decided against plaintiffs’ claims for reinstatement and back pay and those issues are not here involved. We also dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for recovery of plaintiffs’ illicit gratuities
Lane v. United Statespublic domain
NICHOLS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This case comes to us on cross-motions for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ petition and defendant’s counterclaim. We grant defendant’s motion on the petition and plaintiffs’ motion on defendant’s counterclaim. Plaintiffs are four former employees of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Audit Division. At various times during the peri
Bruce Anne Steadman v. Charles Daniel Farmerpublic domain
04/05/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 1, 2021 BRUCE ANNE STEADMAN v. CHARLES DANIEL FARMER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Fentress County No. 20-61 Elizabeth C. Asbury, Chancellor
State v. Eugene C. Baum(073056)public domain
Justice SOLOMON delivered the opinion of the Court. Defendant Eugene Baum, while driving from his residence to his mother’s home, struck and killed two teenage girls walking in the bike lane of a major roadway. At the time of the incident, defendant’s blood alcohol level was four times the legal limit. Defendant had taken a prescribed anti-depressant, Paxil,
Finney, Larry Eugene v. Statepublic domain
MODIFY, REFOR1’1, and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 8. 2013. In [lie (!tntrt of A4iiI1 .Fif1l! Jii1rtct of exao zi il1a No. 05-12-00057-CR No, 05- 12-00058-CR LARRY EUGENE FINNEY, Appellant V.
STATE OF MISSOURI v. TERRELL EUGENE PRINEpublic domain
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., C.J./P.J. -OPINION AUTHOR Terrell Eugene Prine (“Prine”),1 appeals his conviction of the class A felony of first-degree robbery, pursuant to section 569.020; and the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, pursuant to section 571.015.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Facts and Procedural Bac
Finney, Larry Eugene v. Statepublic domain
MODIFY, REFOR1’1, and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 8. 2013. In [lie (!tntrt of A4iiI1 .Fif1l! Jii1rtct of exao zi il1a No. 05-12-00057-CR No, 05- 12-00058-CR LARRY EUGENE FINNEY, Appellant V.
Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane Countypublic domain
180 P.3d 35 (2008) 218 Or. App. 339 CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY, Philip Ziebert, Adam Novick, and Maureen Hudson, Petitioners, v. LANE COUNTY, Respondent. 2005082; A135498. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 17, 2007. Decided March 5, 2008. *36 Daniel J. Stotter, Eug