Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Chapter 7 debtor Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order converting Hunt’s chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding to a chapter 7 proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We affirm. In the opening brief, Hunt fails to address how the bankruptcy court erred in converting Hunt’s bankruptcy case. A

ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR., UNITED' STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (Doc. 6), Defendant’s response in opposition thereto (Doc. 8), Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, Motion to Strike (Doc. 3), and Plaintiffs response in opposition thereto (Doc. 11). The Court, having reviewed the motions and responses, and being otherwise fully advise

OPINION THOMPSON, JUDGE: This matter is before the Court for the second time on an appeal of an award of attorney fees. In Hunt v. North American Stainless, No. 2012-CA-000098-MR, 2014 WL 1881891 (Ky.App.2014) (unpublished), we reversed and remanded for additional findings of fact and a new award of attorney fees. .Gregory Dwayne Hunt and his attorneys as real parties in interest (Garry R. Ada

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. While on supervised release for failing to register as a sex offender, Rod Hunt robbed a bank in Madison, Wisconsin. He pleaded guilty to bank robbery and brandishing a gun during a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a), 924

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND ORDER STAYING PORTION OF ACTION PENDING CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT RULING ON MEAL AND REST BREAK ISSUES FLORENCE-MARIE COOPER, District Judge. The matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (docket no. 59), filed on March 16, 2009. The Court has read and considered the moving, opposing, and reply documents submitted

GRIFFIS, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This appeal comes from the probate of the estate of James J. Chaney Jr. During probate proceedings, a dispute arose as to whether James’s last will and testament had been revoked by a subsequent divorce and property-settlement agreement. In the dispute, James’s ex-wife and daughter claimed rights to real property lo

708 S.E.2d 357 (2011) HUNT v. The STATE. No. S10A1492. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 18, 2011. *358 Jennifer M. Daniels, Decatur, for Appellant. Daniel J. Porter, Dist. Atty., Kimberly A. Gallant, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith., Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Benjamin H. Pierman, Asst. Atty.

691 S.E.2d 368 (2010) HUNT v. The STATE. No. A09A2155. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 2, 2010. *369 Stephen T. Maples, for appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Dist. Atty., Daniel J. Quinn, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. SMITH, Presiding Judge. Karnell Hunt appeals from his convictions for trafficking in

(2008) Daniel M. HUNT, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-11324-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 8, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff Daniel Hunt ("Hunt"), through h

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roy Hunt, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Sandhir, No. 3:06-cv-

BOUDREATU, J., with whom SUMMERS, J., joins: concurring in part; dissenting in part. 1 1 I agree with the portion of the majority opinion that allows the judgment below to stand. I dissent to the portion of the opinion which concludes that by dismissing Courville from the suit for the second time, plaintiff lost the capacity to refile his claim against Courville. The majority op

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roy Hunt, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Sandhir, No. 3:06-cv-

OPINION AND ORDER James L. Graham, United States District Judge The above actions have been brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., by Raymond Or-rand, Administrator of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Plan, Pension Fund, Apprenticeship Fund, and Education and Safety Fund (“the Funds”), and the trustees of those Funds aga

OPINION BOSSON, Justice. {1} The New Mexico Probate Code specifies the means by which a testator may revoke a prior will. See NMSA 1978, § 45-2-507(A) (1993) (stating that a will may be revoked by either executing a subsequent will or by performing a revocatory act on the will). The district court, concluding that the purported revocation in this case was legally ineffecti

ORDER AND REASONS JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, District Judge. Before the Court are two Motions filed by Defendants: (1) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 242), and (2) Motion in Limine to Exclude Dr. Arthur Sanford (R. Doc. 290). For the following reasons, the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs design defect claim shall remain pending, but only insof

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0072p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RAYMOND ORRAND, Administrator of the Ohio ┐ Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Plan, Ohio │ Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating │

ORDER AND REASONS JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, District Judge. Defendants have raised the affirmative defense of preemption. The question presented is whether Plaintiffs product liability claims are preempted by federal law. For the following reasons, the Court finds Defendants have failed to carry their burden of demonstrating preemption. BACKGROUND This a pharma

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Following the dislocation and eventual amputation of his finger, Gregory Smith filed suit against a group of Chicago police officers. Smith alleged that their excessive force and failure to provide medical attention during two separate arrests led to his amputation. During trial, the district court allowed the defense to present evidence of Smith’s heroin use prior to one of the arrests. After the jury fo

GENOVESE, Judge. I tThis case comes before this court pursuant to remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court. DefendanVRelator, the City of Marksville (City), initially applied for supervisory writs with this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court denying its Exception of Prescription. After this court denied the City’s writ, the City then applied for a supervisory and/or remedial writ with the Louisiana Supreme Cou

281 S.W.3d 308 (2009) Timothy COFFER, Respondent, v. Angela WASSON-HUNT, et al., Appellants. No. SC 89605. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. March 17, 2009. As Modified May 5, 2009. *309 William E. Quick, Anthony W. Bonuchi, Kansas City, MO, Lisa S. Morris, Daniel J. Haus, Office of General Counsel, Kansas City