⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Daniel J Robinson”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-03-29 · Published · cited 114× · 817 F.3d 1162; 2016 WL 1211844; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5765
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: After serving a prison sentence for attempted sexual abuse, Daniel Chavez entered probation. As a condition of probation, Chavez was ordered to enroll in a sex offender treatment program, which required him to admit his guilt before treatment began and while his appeal was pending. Chavez maintained his innocence both d
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005-07-07 · Published · cited 137× · 415 F.3d 1252; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13456; 2005 WL 1567306
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Mildred Robinson, as next-of-kin of Steven Walters, deceased, and on behalf of Walters’s minor children, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Daniel Arrugueta, a law enforcement officer, in her action alleging use of excessive force resulting in Walters’s death. I.
In re Danielpublic domain
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-02-22 · Published · cited 1× · 135 A.3d 796; 2016 WL 1536250
PER CURIAM. In 2011 this court determined that Petitioner, Idus Daniel, had commingled client and personal funds in violation of Disciplinary Rule 1.15(a), made false statements to an IRS agent in violation of Disciplinary Rule 8.4(c), and had sought to conceal taxable income from the IRS by concealing it in two IOLTA and client trust accounts, again in violation of Disciplinary Rule 8.4(c). See In re Daniel, 11 A.3
Robinson v. V. D.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
State v. Daniel B.public domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-03-05 · Published · cited 4× · 201 A.3d 989; 331 Conn. 1
KAHN, J. **3The present appeal requires us to consider whether, in determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction for attempt to commit murder under the substantial step provision of General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2), the proper inquiry should focus on what the actor had already done or on what the actor had left to do to complet
Robinson v. Stuartpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 260 So. 3d 268
Per Curiam. Affirmed. Gross, May and Conner, JJ., concur.
In re Daniel N.public domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-12-06 · Published · cited 17× · 150 A.3d 657; 323 Conn. 640
EVELEIGH, J. In this certified appeal, 1 the petitioner, the Commissioner of Children and Families, 2 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of the trial court terminating the parental rights of the respondent father, Jose N., to the minor child, Daniel N. 3
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 809 S.E.2d 585; 370 N.C. 583
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by Charles Becton, Charles Daye, Valerie Johnson, Irving L. Joyner, Floyd B. McKissick, Jr., Cressie H. Thigpen, Jr., and Fred J. Williams for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the tim
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 378
*379The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by North Carolina Council of Churches for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times all
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 362
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of July 2018 by National Association for Public Defense for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:*363"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-18 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 387
*388The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. to admit W. Kerrel Murray Pro Hac Vice:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 368
*369The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Professors John Charles Boger and Robert P. Mosteller for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court w
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-20 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 684
Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State *685The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to admit Robert L. Walker Pro Hac Vice:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 809 S.E.2d 589
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by North Carolina Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 357
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2018 by North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-06-22 · Published · cited 0× · 814 S.E.2d 461
The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 21st of June 2018 by Defendant:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of June 2018."Defendant shall have up to and including the 16th day of July 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-03-15 · Published · cited 0× · 810 S.E.2d 234
The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 13th of March 2018 by Defendant:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of March 2018."
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 375
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 816 S.E.2d 859
*860The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 9th of August 2018 by State of NC:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of August 2018."
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0× · 815 S.E.2d 360
*361The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of July 2018 by North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."