Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel J White and Tanya L White”
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 11, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE EX REL. DANIEL E. BLANDFORD v. TANYA L. BLANDFORD Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Knox County No. G-6502 Timothy E. Irwin, Judge No. E2015-00357-COA-R3-JV-FILED-MARCH 24, 2016 This appeal involves a juvenile court’s subject matter juris
White v. United Statespublic domain
958 A.2d 259 (2008) Robert A. WHITE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 06-CF-942. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 17, 2008. Decided October 16, 2008. *261 Mindy A. Daniels, appointed by this court, for appellant. Perham Gorji, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jef
ECLECTIC INVESTMENT * NO. 2019-CA-0895 PARTNERS, LP * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * CITY OF NEW ORLEANS AND FOURTH CIRCUIT NORMAN WHITE, DIRECTOR * OF FINANCE AND EX STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICIO TAX COLLECTOR ******* APPEAL
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Spring 2025 Term March 19, 2025 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL * NO. 2020-CA-0043 BOARD * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS FOURTH CIRCUIT AND NORMAN WHITE, IN HIS * OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE STATE OF LOUISIANA CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER * * * * * * * FOR THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS APPEAL FROM CIVIL DIST
United States v. Tanya Suttonpublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. As part of an investigation into a counterfeit check scheme, police officers from *551 Madison, Wisconsin, prepared to search Tanya Sutton’s home for evidence relating to that scheme, including a computer allegedly used to produce false paychecks. At a briefing session prior to
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Harris v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-944V Filed: February 21, 2023 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner CAMERON HARRIS, Petitioner, Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular v.
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumpspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DANIEL T.K. HURLEY, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Warren Pumps, LLC (“Warren Pumps”), Crane Company (“Crane”) and Westinghouse Company (n/k/a CBS Corporation)(‘Westinghouse”)[ECF Nos. 105, 108 and 109]. For reasons outlined below, the court has determined to grant the motions.
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT ) OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES, ) Supreme Court Nos. S-18088/18092 OFFICE OF CHILDREN’S SERVICES,
Estate of Martinez v. Taylorpublic domain
ORDER R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendants Sheriff Kirk Taylor, Deputy Cindy Gomez, and Deputy Deana Cook’s motion to dismiss [ECF No. 28] and defendants’ motion to stay discovery [ECF No. 50]. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1367. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is granted. The motion to stay discovery
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CSL PLASMA INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-2360 (TSC) UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, et al., Defendants. HECTOR AMAYA., et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
All Star East Properties, L.L.C. v. Romy Schofield-Samuel, Director of Finance for the City of New Orleanspublic domain
ALL STAR EAST * NO. 2025-CA-0514 PROPERTIES, L.L.C. * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * ROMY SCHOFIELD-SAMUEL, FOURTH CIRCUIT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR * THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FRO
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Opinion filed June 8, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00201-CV __________ VAN MARTIN GASKINS, TRUSTEE OF THE VAN MARTIN GASKINS FAMILY TRUST; KELLY JOE GASKINS, TRUSTEE OF THE KELLY JOE GASKINS FAMILY TRUST; AND KAYLA GASKINS MCDONNELL, TRUSTEE OF THE KAYLA GASKINS MCDONNELL FAMILY TRUST, Appellants
Edwards v. Apontepublic domain
Edwards v Aponte (2020 NY Slip Op 01702) Edwards v Aponte 2020 NY Slip Op 01702 Decided on March 12, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
BYE, Circuit Judge. Daniel Morris appeals from an adverse grant of summary judgment on his deliberate indifference claim against Sheriff Bob Ross and Crawford County, Arkansas. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the district court’s 2 judgment. I Morris was arres
Stovall v. New York City Tr. Auth.public domain
Stovall v New York City Tr. Auth. (2020 NY Slip Op 01705) Stovall v New York City Tr. Auth. 2020 NY Slip Op 01705 Decided on March 12, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting