Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel Lee Matthews”
State v. Daniel M.public domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
United States v. Matthewspublic domain
McClelland, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of desertion, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and one specification of Wrongful use of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appell
Charles GROGAN v. Daniel UGGLA, Et Al.public domain
Sharon G. Lee, J., dissenting. The primary issue is whether a home inspector owes a duty of reasonable care to a homeowner’s guest. Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the guest, as is required at the summary judgment stage, it was foreseeable that a negligent inspection of the home, and particularly the second-story deck railing, could result in a significant in
Daniel Paul Copple v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IRVING, P. J„ for the Court: ¶ 1. After his unsuccessful direct criminal appeal of three convictions, Daniel Paul Copple filed a complaint for discovery in the Lowndes County Chancery Court. He sought to obtain a court reporter’s backup audio recordings of his criminal trial in the hope that they might be useful in a collateral attack of his convictions. Con
United States v. Leepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION JOHN GLEESON, District Judge. Defendant Matthew Hung Lee moved this Court to amend or modify his conditions of pre-trial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b).1 Lee challenges the condition of release requiring him to (1) “undergo mental health evaluation and/or treatment specific to the offense charged;” and (2) sign a waiver of confidentialit
Bobby Lee Zeigler v. State of Floridapublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BOBBY LEE ZEIGLER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-2754 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 11, 2016. An ap
Deana Lee Davis v. Matthew Cary Davispublic domain
James Edward Welsh, Judge Matthew Davis appeals the circuit, court’s "Judgment of Contempt and Enforcing and Construing Prior Decree” entered against him as a result of his failure to comply with the judgment dissolving his marriage to Deana Davis. We dismiss the appeal. Background The marriage of Deana Davis (“Mother”) and Matth
Little River, LLC v. Lee Cnty.public domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of January 2018 by Respondent (Lee County) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of October 2018."
Lee Malvo v. Randall Mathenapublic domain
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: In Virginia in 2004, a defendant convicted of capital murder, who was at least 16 years old at the time of his crime, would be punished by either death or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, unless the judge suspended his sentence. After a Virginia jury convicted Lee Boyd Malvo of two counts of capital murder based on homicides that he committ
United States v. Daniel Lee Watsonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Daniel Lee Watson appeals his conviction on nineteen counts of aiding and assisting the preparation of false income tax returns. We affirm. A grand jury returned a twenty-count indictment against Watson, a certified public accountant, charging him with willfully aiding, assisting, and advising in the preparation of United States Individual Income Tax Re
Broadnax v. Daniel Custom Construction, LLCpublic domain
726 S.E.2d 770 (2012) 315 Ga. App. 291 BROADNAX v. DANIEL CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al. No. A11A2124. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 29, 2012. *772 Benjamin Frederick Windham, McDonough, John David Hadden and John C. Bell Jr., Augusta, for Appellant. M. Steven Heath, Athens, Matthew Allen Mose
Daniel Brink v. Continental Insurance Companypublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Daniel Brink, joined by thirty-one other individuals, brought a class action lawsuit stemming from the workers’ compensation benefits owed to class members under the Defense Base Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1651 et seq., for injuries suffered
Kountze Independent School District v. Coti Matthews, on Behalf of Her Minor Child MacY Matthewspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES KREGER, Justice. This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s denial of Kountze Independent School District’s (“Kountze ISD”) plea to the jurisdiction. Appellees, parents of certain cheerleaders from Kountze High School (“Parents”), brought suit against Kountze ISD and its former superintendent, Kevin Weldon, after Weld
Jacked Up, LLC v. Sara Lee Corp.public domain
DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant Sara Lee Corporation ("Sara Lee") has filed an Amended Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Damages Expert, see Dkt. No. 188, which United States District Judge Sam A. Lindsay has referred to the undersigned United States magistrate judge for determination, see Dkt. No. 191. Plaintiff Jacked Up, LLC ("Jacked Up") filed a response, see Dkt. No.
Overhead Door Co. etc. v. Daniel Lee Lewispublic domain
BAKER, Judge. In this appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (commission), the dominant question presented by Overhead Door Company of Norfolk and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (jointly referred to herein as employer) is that assuming the attorney employed by Daniel Lee Lewis (claimant) negligently caused c
Oberist Lee Saunders v. George C. Dukepublic domain
JORDAN, Circuit Judge: We have repeatedly ruled that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment, and is denied qualified immunity, if he or she uses gratuitous and excessive force against a suspect who is under control, not resisting, and obeying commands. See, e.g., Priester v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida, 208 F.3d 919, 927 (11th Cir.2000);
Lee v. Certainteed Corp.public domain
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This case, originally brought against 23 defendants where the eight above-captioned now remain, comes before the court on motions premised on Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure separately filed March 10, 2015, on behalf of defen*784dants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“JMM”) (DE 151) and Form
Tyron Brown v. Lee Lucaspublic domain
GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH and GUY, JJ., joined. KEITH, J. (pp. 624-26), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants Johnny Robertson, Nolan Lovett, Arrico Spires, Charles Matthews, Marlon Brooks, and Tyron Brown appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants-appellees L
HORTON, Justice. Dale and Kathi Lee appeal the district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Willow Creek Ranch Estates No. 2 Subdivision Homeowners' Association, Inc. (the HOA). The dispute between the Lees and the HOA involves a 1997 agreement (the Agreement) that purportedly grants the Lees three access points to a private road owned by the HOA. The Lees conceded in
OPINION SHARON G. LEE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ., joined. *320 We accepted a question of law certified by the United