⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Daniel Lewis Gibbs”

Gibbs v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012-10-25 · Published · cited 0× · 99 So. 3d 630; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18639; 2012 WL 5273124
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Gibbs v. Grimmettepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001-06-15 · Published · cited 133× · 254 F.3d 545; 2001 WL 672741
ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge: This case involves a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Appellant Lenard G. Gibbs, a pretrial detainee, against Sheriff Mack Grimmette, two county deputies, and three nurses from the Bolivar County Department of Health for failure to administer Gibbs a tuberculosis skin test. Gibbs
Gibbs v. Inchpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 864
Per Curiam. *865The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Gibbs v. Inchpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 864
Per Curiam. *865The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
State v. Gibbspublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 103 So. 3d 394; 2012 WL 1859042; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 683
LOLLEY, J. | Daniel Lee Gibbs seeks review of the judgment of the First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, State of Louisiana, wherein the trial court convicted him of one count of commercial littering pursuant to La. R.S. 30:2531.3 and assessed a fine of $3,000.00. For the following reasons, we *395affirm the trial court’s conviction and sentence.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-5324 _____________________________ DANIEL EUGENE GIBBS, SR., Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Respondents. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
Glenn v. Gibbspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 323 Ga. App. 18; 746 S.E.2d 658; 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2591; 2013 WL 3499470; 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 639
Phipps, Chief Judge. Madeira Glenn, the widow of Joel Glenn, sued homeowners Frankie and Trena Gibbs, seeking damages for the death of Joel Glenn as a result of a fall on the Gibbses’ property. The trial court granted summary judgment to the Gibbses. Madeira Glenn appeals. We affirm. To prevail on summary judgment, the moving party must show that no genuine issues of material fact remain to be tried
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2015-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
management of his finances. Albert created GWB Trust into which any interest he may have held in the Estate could be funneled. He then created Renhaw, Inc., and Pentex FILED IN Royalty Trust, 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS int
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-07-30 · Published · cited 34× · 7 F.4th 414
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0171p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-A
State v. Lewispublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 277 S.C. 234; 285 S.E.2d 354; 1981 S.C. LEXIS 520
Ness, Justice: Appellants Rothwell and Lewis were convicted as accessories to murder before and after the fact, and of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Rothwell alleges the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict in his favor on the charge of intent to distribute cocaine. The evidence presented at trial reveals that both Lewis and Rothwell were conspirators from beginning to end,
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
,§;?€; wf- !3-5.3,;).10/» 5 €-pfec{/u¢ A'S$/s lt aff gin €aunjez/ ;57§»?@€/ Ye" la §arz-a ' % §§<5,§32~@! NOS. 15-41085 AND 15-41086 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appelle VS. DI§TRICK Lé'wis JoHNSoN SE@URT§§CEIVED'N _ Def`endant - Appella,nt CH!M|NAL APpEAl-S NOV 06 2035 APPEAL FROM cAUSE NUMBER'S a ia-cv-Aeo B§YNY§EIE$IKZBHK UNITED sTATES DISTRICT coURT FoR THE EASTERN DISTRICT 0F TEXAS, SHERMAN DIvIS
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 24× · 654 F. Supp. 2d 204; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84685; 2009 WL 2971072
654 F.Supp.2d 204 (2009) DEFER LP, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 3449(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 17, 2009. *206 Daniel C. Girard, Jonathan K. Levine, Aaron M. Sheanin, Christina H.C. Sharp, Girard Gibbs LLP, for Plaintiff. Christian R. Barthol
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988-03-17 · Published · cited 79× · 839 F.2d 1124; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3359; 1988 WL 15705
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeks to recover for deprivation of property rights without due process of law and for arrest without probable cause. After hearing the plaintiff’s evidence the district court dismissed the case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Although we find that the
Lewis v. Jarviepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-09-26 · Published · cited 265× · 20 F. App'x 457
Man Lewis, Jr., a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court order dismissing his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Seeking monetary and injunctive relief, Lewis sued Property Room Supervisor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002-08-23 · Published · cited 154× · 304 F.3d 563; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17528; 2002 WL 2012563
CLAY, J., announced the judgment of the court and delivered an opinion, in which GILMAN, J., concurred as to Part III-C. GILMAN, J. (pp. 582-83), delivered a separate opinion, in which WALLACE, J., concurred, which constitutes the opinion of the court on the issue addressed in Part III-B. WALLACE, J. (pp. 583-86), delivered a separate dissenting opinion as to Part III— C of Judge CLAY’s opinion. OPINION CLAY,
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 805 So. 2d 551; 2000 Miss. App. LEXIS 140; 2000 WL 311515
¶ 1. Richard C. O'Neal (Richard) was killed on April 30, 1992, when he was struck by a vehicle driven by Thomas Edward Bernard, an employee of appellee Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc. (Roche), while attempting to cross Highway 90 in Biloxi, Mississippi. Appellant Margaret T. O'Neal (O'Neal) filed this *Page 552 wrongful death claim on behalf of the deceased. After a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, the jury returne
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011-09-12 · Published · cited 8× · 277 F.R.D. 316; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102907; 2011 WL 4047666
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ROYAL FURGESON, Senior District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Representative Plaintiff Donald Stott’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement with Capital Financial Services, Inc., filed on February 18, 2011 (Stott Docket No. 2).1
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 1× · 80 F. Supp. 3d 963; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6445; 2015 WL 263691
*965MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4]; and (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Remand to State Court [Doc. No. 26], For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiffs Mo
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DIVISION PHIPPS, C. J., ELLINGTON, P. J., and BRANCH, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ July 15, 2013
People v. Lewispublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2001-05-17 · Published · cited 454× · 22 P.3d 392; 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 629; 25 Cal. 4th 610
106 Cal.Rptr.2d 629 (2001) 25 Cal.4th 610 22 P.3d 392 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Milton Otis LEWIS, Defendant and Appellant. No. S018665. Supreme Court of California. May 17, 2001. Rehearing Denied June 27, 2001. *640 Marc D. Stolman, Tiburon, for Defe