Cases

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. Hamer, 2013 IL 115130 Caption in Supreme HARTNEY FUEL OIL COMPANY et al., Appellees, v. BRIAN A. Court: HAMER, Director of the Illinois Department of Revenue, et al., Appellants. Docket Nos. 115130, 115131 cons. Filed Novemb

Filed 12/12/14; part. pub. order 1/6/15 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DONAHUE SCHRIBER REALTY GROUP, INC., F068287 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13CECG02422) v. NU CREATION OUTREACH et al., OPINION

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge. This appeal emanates from a summary judgment rejecting a claim of intentional interference by a third party with contractual relations subsisting between franchisees of retail paneling stores and their franchisor. 1 The pivotal is

988 F.Supp. 127 (1997) Gregory F. DANIEL, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BOARD OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, et al., Defendants. No. 90-CV-1086A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 19, 1997. *128 *129 *130 *1

OPINION AND ORDER WOOD, District Judge. In this action, the Secretary of Labor seeks pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 217 to permanently enjoin the defendants from violating Sections 15(a) (2) and 15(a) (5) of The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), and to further restrain the withholding of overtime payments allegedly due employees of the defendants. Before us is the Government

Filed 4/6/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE et al., C075930 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. Nos. 34-2012-

Opinion RUVOLO, P. J. I. INTRODUCTION The State Air Resources Board (the Board) is charged with implementing the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. (Health & Saf. Code, § 38500 et seq.; 1 the 2006 Act.) The Board’s mandate includes

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Thomas Zingis (A-66-21) (087132) Argued March 26, 2024 -- Decided August 8, 2024 -- Revised November 7, 2024 NORIEGA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In State v. Cassidy

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Thomas Zingis (A-66-21) (087132) Argued March 26, 2024 -- Decided August 8, 2024 NORIEGA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In State v. Cassidy, 235 N.J. 482, 486 (2018),

367 Mass. 578 (1975) 328 N.E.2d 505 EUPHEMIA DONAHUE vs. RODD ELECTROTYPE COMPANY OF NEW ENGLAND, INC. & others.[1] Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. October 8, 1974. May 2, 1975. Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, KAPLAN, & WILKINS, JJ. William M. O'Brien for the plaintiff.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2023 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 22-1081 STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ADVANCED ENERGY UN

381 F.Supp.2d 343 (2005) K.M., on Behalf of her son, D.G., an infant, Plaintiff, v. HYDE PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. No. 03 CIV. 6010. United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 11, 2005. *344 *345 *346 Barbara J. Ebenstein, S

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 6, 2019 Decided October 25, 2019 No. 18-1114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH ITS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA AND CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIR

899 F.2d 1045 FIRST ALABAMA BANK OF MONTGOMERY, N.A.,Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., a corporation andCameron and Colby Company, Incorporated, a/k/aCameron and Colby Co., Incorporated, aMassachusetts corporation,Defendants-Appellants,Johnson & Higgins of Georgia, Inc., a corporation, 1st St.Ins. & Cameron & Colby,Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 6, 2019 Decided October 25, 2019 Reissued November 14, 2019 No. 18-1114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH ITS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA AND CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: These consolidated petitions for review challenge various aspects of the Clean Air Interstate Rule. Because we find more than several fatal flaws in the rule and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) adopted the rule as one, integral action, we vacate the rule in its entirety and remand to EPA to promulgate a rule that is consistent with this opinion

251 F.3d 612 (7th Cir. 2001) Peso Chavez and Gregory Lee, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The Illinois State Police, Terrance W. Gainer, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois State Police, Michael Snyders, individually and in his official capacity as Illinois State Police Operation Valkyrie Coordinator, Edward Kresl, individually and in his official capaci

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

KANNE, Circuit Judge. In this civil rights lawsuit, a putative class action, plaintiffs claim that the drug interdiction unit of the Illinois State Police (ISP), Operation Valkyrie, has a practice of stopping, detaining, and searching African-American and Hispanic motorists based on their race and without legally sufficient cause or justification. The allegation before us, at it

10 Cal.4th 844 (1995) 897 P.2d 530 42 Cal. Rptr.2d 592 ALFONSO MACIAS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S039245. Supreme Court of California. July 17, 1995. *846 COUNSEL Litt, Marquez & Fajardo, Li