Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel Matthew King”
United States v. Matthew Kingpublic domain
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. A sting operation blends fiction with non-fiction. The undercover officer feigns an offer to commit a crime and the individual accepts the offer, converting an offer to commit a crime based on untruths into a crime based on a .true desire to violate the law. Sometimes, as it happens, the resulting crime blends non-fiction wi
United States v. Kingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 881 A. The Criminal Charges.. .882 B. The Trials and Convictions... 883 C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884 II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886 A
Christ the King Manor, Inc. v. Burwellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM Hon. John E. Jones III, Judge Presently pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment filed by the parties in the above-captioned matter. (Docs. 29, 31). For the reasons that follow, the Court shall grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs bring this acti
United States v. Kingpublic domain
ORDER STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Bartiee King’s “Second Motion To Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence” is before the court. Doc. no. 982. The government has responded, doc. no. *11151031, and Mr. King filed a reply brief. Doc. no. 1070. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 13, 2015.1
Owens, J. ¶ 1 Article VII of the Washington Constitution imposes a set of requirements on taxes for the protection of the taxpayers; however, not all governmental charges are “taxes” that are subject to those requirements. At issue in this case is whether a certain governmental *292charge imposed on Indian tribes is a tax. After the legislature amended a statute to expand
OPINION Lisa S. Van Amburg, Judge Appellant Daniel Murphy appeals the trial court’s order granting Respondent Stonewall Kitchen, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss. We reverse the trial court and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Background Daniel Murphy filed this lawsuit under t
Jay Clogg Realty Group, Inc. v. Burger King Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiff Jay Clogg Realty Group, Inc. has brought this purported class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, alleging that Defendant Burger King Corp. sent improper and unsolicited facsimile advertisements to members of the purported plaintiff class. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint or to stri
Rel: April 21, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM,
Matthew Fisher v. Jeanne Robertspublic domain
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. OPINION Plaintiff appeals the District Court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 or 60(b) and for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for further
Pitts Sales, Inc. v. King World Productions, Inc.public domain
383 F.Supp.2d 1354 (2005) PITTS SALES, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. KING WORLD PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Larry Posner, individually and Matthew T. Yule, individually, Defendants. No. 04-60664-CIV-COHN/SNOW. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 28, 2005. *1355 Cynthia J. Becker, Harrah, O
Matthew Green v. DOJpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 6, 2024 Decided August 2, 2024 No. 23-5159 MATTHEW D. GREEN, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:1
Nordyke v. Kingpublic domain
Opinion MORENO, J. We granted the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, for certification pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.5 to address the following question: Does state' law regulating the possession of firearms and gun shows preempt a municipal ordinance prohibiting gun possession on county property? We conclude that the municipal ordinance in question, insofar as
Matthew Howell v. Justin McCormickpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0236p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MATTHEW HOWELL; ALISHA BROWN, │ Plaintiffs-
Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryantpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7362 Doc: 78 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7362 MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NADINE J. BRYANT; P. M. MANNION; ARLENE
People v. Daniel A.public domain
People v Daniel A. (2020 NY Slip Op 03020) People v Daniel A. 2020 NY Slip Op 03020 Decided on May 27, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
KING DRUG CO. OF FLORENCE, INC. v. Cephalon, Inc.public domain
702 F.Supp.2d 514 (2010) KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CEPHALON, INC., et al., Defendants. Vista Healthplan, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., Defendants. Apotex, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., Defendants. Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Cephalon, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 2:06-cv-1797, 2:06-cv-1833, 2:06-cv-276
Diaz v. Cobbpublic domain
475 F.Supp.2d 1270 (2007) Emma Yaiza DIAZ; John A. Lanman; American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO; Florida Public Employees Council 79, AFSCME, AFL-CIO; and Service Employees International Union, Plaintiffs, v. Sue M. COBB, Secretary of State of Florida; Brenda Snipes, Broward County Supervisor of Elections; Jerry Holland, Duval County Supervisor
King v. Brookspublic domain
788 P.2d 707 (1990) Larry KING, Appellant, v. Glenn BROOKS, Appellee, University of Alaska, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. S-2871/S-2906. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 2, 1990. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing April 6, 1990. Bradley D. Owens, Jermain, Dunnagan & Owens, Anchorage, for appellant. William Walker, Anchorage, for G
Matthew Meinecke v. City of Seattlepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW MEINECKE, No. 23-35481 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv- v. 00352-BJR CITY OF SEATTLE; DANIEL NELSON, Lieutenant, Seattle Police OPINION Department; ROBERT BROWN, Lieutenant, Seattle Police Department; SEAN CULBERTSON, Police Officer, Seattle Police Department,
GORDON JAMES KING vs STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED GORDON JAMES KING, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D21-2401 LT Case No. 2019-CF-007061 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appel